Load firmware and bundles in GM200's constructor. The previously called
GF100 function did not care about the bundles.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There functions are going to be used by other chips that rely on
NVIDIA-provided firmware. Export them.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Make these functions easier to use by handling memory management from
within.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The firmwares required by GR may vary from chip to chip, especially with
the introduction of secure boot and NVIDIA-provided firmwares. Move the
firmware loading outside of gf100_gr_ctor so other chips may still call
it while managing their firmwares themselves.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some members of gf100_gr were freed by the gk20a driver. That's not
where it should be done - free them in gf100 so other chips that use
NVIDIA-provided firmware free these structures properly.
This also removes the need for a GK20A-specific destructor.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add support for GM20B's graphics engine, based on GK20A. Note that this
code alone will not allow the engine to initialize on released devices
which require PMU-assisted secure boot.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GK20A's initialization was based on GK104, but differences exist in the
way the initial context is built and the initialization process itself.
This patch follows the same initialization sequence as nvgpu performs
to avoid bad surprises. Since the register bundles initialization also
differ considerably from GK104, the register packs are now loaded from
firmware files, again similarly to what is done with nvgpu.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Shorter device name, match Tegra and our existing enums.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
