This commit finishes implementing #21209 by removing the
`@setAlignStack` builtin in favour of `CallingConvention` payloads. The
x86_64 backend is updated to use the stack alignment given in the
calling convention (the LLVM backend was already updated in a previous
commit).
Resolves: #21209
The old `CallingConvention` type is replaced with the new
`NewCallingConvention`. References to `NewCallingConvention` in the
compiler are updated accordingly. In addition, a few parts of the
standard library are updated to use the new type correctly.
As well as being necessary for the `CallingConvention` changes, this
update includes the following notable changes:
* Fix unlabeled `break` targeting the wrong scope in the presence of
labeled continue, unblocking #21422
* Implement `@FieldType`
* Implement `@splat` on arrays
Signed-off-by: mlugg <mlugg@mlugg.co.uk>
This commit begins implementing accepted proposal #21209 by making
`std.builtin.CallingConvention` a tagged union.
The stage1 dance here is a little convoluted. This commit introduces the
new type as `NewCallingConvention`, keeping the old `CallingConvention`
around. The compiler uses `std.builtin.NewCallingConvention`
exclusively, but when fetching the type from `std` when running the
compiler (e.g. with `getBuiltinType`), the name `CallingConvention` is
used. This allows a prior build of Zig to be used to build this commit.
The next commit will update `zig1.wasm`, and then the compiler and
standard library can be updated to completely replace
`CallingConvention` with `NewCallingConvention`.
The second half of #21209 is to remove `@setAlignStack`, which will be
implemented in another commit after updating `zig1.wasm`.
* fix compilation errors for fs and fs.Dir
* mem.span instead of mem.sliceTo
* Updating symLinkAbsoluteW function parameters
* Update with expected rename semantics
These are really answering questions about the Zig compiler's capacity to
provide a libc/libc++ implementation. As such, std.zig.target seems like a more
fitting place for these.
The re-analysis here is a little coarse; it'd be nice in the future to
have a way for an AstGen failure to preserve *all* analysis which
depends on the last success, and just hide the compile errors which
depend on it somehow. But I'm not sure how we'd achieve that, so this
works fine for now.
Resolves: #21223
This not only simplifies the error bundling logic, but also improves
efficiency by allowing the result to be cached between, for instance,
multiple calls to `totalErrorCount`.
This isn't exactly the case provided in #11290, but is a slightly
simpler case which I know would have triggered the same bug in the old
implementation of incremental compilation.
Resolves: #11290
