Fix s25fl256s position in spi_flash_ids list
Spansion S25FS256S and S25FL256S flashes have equal JEDEC ID and ext ID. As far as S25FL256S occures in spi_flash_ids before S25FS256S, U-Boot incorrectly detects FS flash as FL. Thus its better to compare with S25FS256S first. Signed-off-by: Vsevolod Gribov <vgribov@larch-networks.com> [Added S-o-b] Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
545a438222
commit
db10809c17
@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_info spi_flash_ids[] = {
|
||||
{"s25fl128s_256k", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fl128s_64k", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fl256s_256k", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fl256s_64k", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fs256s_64k", INFO6(0x010219, 0x4d0181, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP | SECT_4K) },
|
||||
{"s25fl256s_64k", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fs512s", INFO6(0x010220, 0x4d0081, 128 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP | SECT_4K) },
|
||||
{"s25fl512s_256k", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
{"s25fl512s_64k", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user