sf: Fix entries for S25FL256S_256K and S25FL512S_256K
Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix, compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also, they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Tested-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaganna@xilinx.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
194ba5d4ec
commit
c1f9325965
@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
|
||||
{"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL064P", 0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL128S_64K", 0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL256S_64K", 0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
{"S25FL512S_64K", 0x010220, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO /* STMICRO */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user