zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()
Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack pointer is setup after function call in _main(). Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call as the first function in board_init_f() which already have correct stack pointer. Reported-by: Sven Schwermer <sven.schwermer@tuhh.de> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
183acb7003
commit
262f08d6ea
@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
|
||||
|
||||
void lowlevel_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int arch_cpu_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
zynq_slcr_unlock();
|
||||
/* remap DDR to zero, FILTERSTART */
|
||||
@ -31,6 +35,8 @@ void lowlevel_init(void)
|
||||
writel(0xC, &slcr_base->ddr_urgent);
|
||||
|
||||
zynq_slcr_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void reset_cpu(ulong addr)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user