boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Just pass struct file *. Methods are happier that way...
There's no need to return struct file * from finish_open() now,
so let it return int. Next: saner prototypes for parts in
namei.c
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Change of calling conventions:
old new
NULL 1
file 0
ERR_PTR(-ve) -ve
Caller *knows* that struct file *; no need to return it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and let finish_open() report having opened the file via that sucker.
Next step: don't modify od->filp at all.
[AV: FILE_CREATE was already used by cifs; Miklos' fix folded]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Perform open_check_o_direct() in a common place in do_last after opening the
file.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Move the lookup retry logic to the bottom of the function to make the normal
case simpler to read.
Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Consistently use bool for boolean values in do_last().
Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
All users of open intents have been converted to use ->atomic_{open,create}.
This patch gets rid of nd->intent.open and related infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic open+create
operation implemented via ->create. No functionality is changed.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic lookup+open+create
operation implemented via ->lookup and ->create operations.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
What was the purpose of this?
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic lookup+open+create
operation implemented via ->lookup and ->create operations.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add an ->atomic_open implementation which replaces the atomic open+create
operation implemented via ->create. No functionality is changed.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
is_atomic_open() is now only used by nfs4_lookup_revalidate() to check whether
it's okay to skip normal revalidation.
It does a racy check for mount read-onlyness and falls back to normal
revalidation if the open would fail. This makes little sense now that this
function isn't used for determining whether to actually open the file or not.
The d_mountpoint() check still makes sense since it is an indication that we
might be following a mount and so open may not revalidate the dentry.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Instead check LOOKUP_EXCL in nd->flags, which is basically what the open intent
flags were used for.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't pass nfs_open_context() to ->create(). Only the NFS4 implementation
needed that and only because it wanted to return an open file using open
intents. That task has been replaced by ->atomic_open so it is not necessary
anymore to pass the context to the create rpc operation.
Despite nfs4_proc_create apparently being okay with a NULL context it Oopses
somewhere down the call chain. So allocate a context here.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Replace NFS4 specific ->lookup implementation with ->atomic_open impelementation
and use the generic nfs_lookup for other lookups.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Add a new inode operation which is called on the last component of an open.
Using this the filesystem can look up, possibly create and open the file in one
atomic operation. If it cannot perform this (e.g. the file type turned out to
be wrong) it may signal this by returning NULL instead of an open struct file
pointer.
i_op->atomic_open() is only called if the last component is negative or needs
lookup. Handling cached positive dentries here doesn't add much value: these
can be opened using f_op->open(). If the cached file turns out to be invalid,
the open can be retried, this time using ->atomic_open() with a fresh dentry.
For now leave the old way of using open intents in lookup and revalidate in
place. This will be removed once all the users are converted.
David Howells noticed that if ->atomic_open() opens the file but does not create
it, handle_truncate() will be called on it even if it is not a regular file.
Fix this by checking the file type in this case too.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Copy __lookup_hash() into lookup_open(). The next patch will insert the atomic
open call just before the real lookup.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Split out lookup + maybe create from do_last(). This is the part under i_mutex
protection.
The function is called lookup_open() and returns a filp even though the open
part is not used yet.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Make the slow lookup part of O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT opens common.
This allows atomic_open to be hooked into the slow lookup part.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Check O_CREAT on the slow lookup paths where necessary. This allows the rest to
be shared with plain open.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
no need for kludgy "set cookie to ERR_PTR(...) because we failed
before we did actual ->follow_link() and want to suppress put_link()",
no pointless check in put_link() itself.
Callers checked if follow_link() has failed anyway; might as well
break out of their loops if that happened, without bothering
to call put_link() first.
[AV: folded fixes from hch]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
we used to need to clean it in RCU callback freeing an inode;
in 3.2 that requirement went away. Unfortunately, it hadn't
been reflected in Documentation/filesystems/porting.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
