For tgl+, the per-context setting of MI_MODE[12] determines whether
the bits of a nested MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START instruction should be
interpreted in the traditional manner or whether they should
instead use a new tgl+ meaning that breaks backward compatibility, but
allows nesting into 3rd-level batchbuffers. For previous platforms,
the hardware default for this register bit is to maintain
backward-compatible behavior unless a context intentionally opts into
the new behavior; however Xe_HPG flips the hardware default behavior.
From a SW perspective, we want to maintain the backward-compatible
behavior for userspace, so we'll apply a fake workaround to set it back
to the legacy behavior on platforms where the hardware default is to
break compatibility. At the moment there is no Linux userspace that
utilizes third-level batchbuffers, so this will avoid userspace from
needing to make any changes. using the legacy meaning is the correct
thing to do. If/when we have userspace consumers that want to utilize
third-level batch nesting, we can provide a context parameter to allow
them to opt-in.
Bspec: 45974, 45718
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210805163647.801064-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Starting in XeHP, the concept of slice has been removed in favor of
DSS (Dual-Subslice) masks for various workload types. These workloads have
been divided into those enabled for geometry and those enabled for compute.
i915 currently maintains a single set of S/SS/EU masks for the device.
The goal of this patch set is to minimize the amount of impact to prior
generations while still giving the user maximum flexibility.
v2:
- Generalize a comment about uapi access to geometry/compute masks; the
proposed uapi has changed since the comment was first written, and
will show up in a future series once the userspace code is published.
(Lucas)
v3:
- Eliminate unnecessary has_compute_dss flag. (Lucas)
- Drop unwanted comment change in uapi header. (Lucas)
Bspec: 33117, 33118, 20376
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210806172901.1049133-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We no longer have traditional slices on Xe_HP platforms, but the
INSTDONE registers are replicated according to gslice representation
which is similar. We can mostly re-use the existing instdone code with
just a few modifications:
* Create an alternate instdone loop macro that will iterate over the
flat DSS space, but still provide the gslice/dss steering values for
compatibility with the legacy code.
* We should allocate INSTDONE storage space according to the maximum
number of gslices rather than the maximum number of legacy slices to
ensure we have enough storage space to hold all of the values. XeHP
design has 8 gslices, whereas older platforms never had more than 3
slices.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210805163647.801064-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The bspec lists many shadowed registers (i.e., registers for which we
don't need to grab forcewake when writing) that we weren't tracking in
the driver. Although we may not actually use all of these registers
right now, it's best to just match the bspec list exactly.
Note that the bspec also lists registers that are shadowed for various
HW-internal accesses; we can ignore those and just list the ones that
are shadowed for accesses from the IA/CPU.
Bspec: 52077
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729054118.2458523-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The bspec lists many shadowed registers (i.e., registers for which we
don't need to grab forcewake when writing) that we weren't tracking in
the driver. Although we may not actually use all of these registers
right now, it's best to just match the bspec list exactly.
Note that the bspec also lists registers that are shadowed for various
HW-internal accesses; we can ignore those and just list the ones that
are shadowed for accesses from the IA/CPU.
Bspec: 18333
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729054118.2458523-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Rather than defining our shadow tables as a list of individual
registers, provide them as a list of register ranges; we'll have some
ranges of multiple registers being added soon (and we already have a
couple adjacent registers that we can squash into a single range now).
This change also defines the table with hex literal values rather than
symbolic register names; since that's how the tables are defined in the
bspec, this change will make it easier to review the tables overall.
v2:
- Force signed comparison on range overlap sanity check
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729152158.2646246-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The forcewake read logic is identical between gen11 and gen12, only the
forcewake table data (which is tracked separately) differs; there's no
need to generate a separate set of gen12 read functions when the gen11
functions will work just as well.
We'll keep the separate write functions for now since the generated code
directly references different shadow tables between the two platforms.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729054118.2458523-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
For historical reasons, the GT forcewake domain used to be referred to
as the "blitter" domain; that name is no longer accurate since the GT
domain contains a lot of additional registers and functionality besides
just the blitter. Although we renamed the domain in the driver in
commit 55e3c17095 ("drm/i915: Rename FORCEWAKE_BLITTER to
FORCEWAKE_GT"), we neglected to update the string that gets printed in
driver error messages; let's do that now to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729054118.2458523-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Although DG2_G10 platforms will always have all SQIDI's present and
don't need steering for registers in a SQIDI MMIO range, this isn't true
for DG2_G11 platforms; only SQIDI's 2 and 3 can be used on those.
We handle SQIDI ranges a bit differently from other types of explicit
steering. The SQIDI ranges belong to either the MCFG unit or the SF
unit, both of which have their own dedicated steering registers and do
not use the typical 0xFDC steering control that all other types of
ranges use. Thus we only need to worry about picking a valid initial
value for the MCFG and SF steering registers (0xFD0 and 0xFD8
respectively) at driver init; they won't change after we set them up so
we don't need to worry about re-steering them explicitly at runtime.
Given that any SQIDI value should work fine for DG2-G10 and XeHP SDV,
while only values of 2 and 3 are valid for DG2-G11, we'll just
initialize the MCFG and SF steering registers to a constant value of "2"
for all XeHP-based platforms for simplicity --- that will work in all
cases.
Bspec: 66534
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Xe_HP is more modular than its predecessors and as a consequence it has
more types of replicated registers. As with l3bank regions on previous
platforms, we may need to explicitly re-steer accesses to these new
types of ranges at runtime if we can't find a single default steering
value that satisfies the fusing of all types.
v2:
- Add a local 'i915' variable to reduce gt->i915 usage. (Caz)
- Drop unused 'intel_gt_read_register' prototype. (Caz)
v3:
- Drop unnecessary comment text. (Lucas)
- Drop unused register bit definition. (Lucas)
Bspec: 66534
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Jason Ekstrand requested a more efficient method than userptr+set-domain
to determine if the userptr object was backed by a complete set of pages
upon creation. To be more efficient than simply populating the userptr
using get_user_pages() (as done by the call to set-domain or execbuf),
we can walk the tree of vm_area_struct and check for gaps or vma not
backed by struct page (VM_PFNMAP). The question is how to handle
VM_MIXEDMAP which may be either struct page or pfn backed...
With discrete we are going to drop support for set_domain(), so offering
a way to probe the pages, without having to resort to dummy batches has
been requested.
v2:
- add new query param for the PROBE flag, so userspace can easily
check if the kernel supports it(Jason).
- use mmap_read_{lock, unlock}.
- add some kernel-doc.
v3:
- In the docs also mention that PROBE doesn't guarantee that the pages
will remain valid by the time they are actually used(Tvrtko).
- Add a small comment for the hole finding logic(Jason).
- Move the param next to all the other params which just return true.
Testcase: igt/gem_userptr_blits/probe
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723113405.427004-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
The DG2 forcewake table is very similar to the one used by XeHP SDV (and
both platforms are even presented as a single table in the bspec). For
the most part DG2 starts using a few additional ranges that were
'reserved' on XeHP SDV and stops using some others. However there is a
single range (0xd800-0xd87f) that needs to be handled differently
between the two platforms (it needs GT wake on XeHP SDV, but render wake
on DG2) so unless we want to wake both domains (which could waste power)
or define new types of forcewake domains for this special case we need
to have separate tables for the two platforms. Let's define the ranges
for both platforms with a parameterized macro so that we don't actually
need to duplicate everything in the code.
It should be fine for DG2 to re-use the Xe_HP shadow register list so we
can continue to use the 'xehpsdv' MMIO write functions and don't need to
spin up a separate DG2 instance.
Bspec: 66534
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
This feature hands over the control of HW RC6 to the GuC.
GuC decides when to put HW into RC6 based on it's internal
busyness algorithms.
GuCRC needs GuC submission to be enabled, and only
supported on Gen12+ for now.
When GuCRC is enabled, do not set HW RC6. Use a H2G message
to tell GuC to enable GuCRC. When disabling RC6, tell GuC to
revert RC6 control back to KMD. KMD is still responsible for
enabling everything related to Coarse Power Gating though.
v2: Address comments (Michal W)
v3: Don't set hysterisis values when GuCRC is used (Matt Roper)
v4: checkpatch()
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730202119.23810-15-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
Tests that exercise the SLPC get/set frequency interfaces.
Clamp_max will set max frequency to multiple levels and check
that SLPC requests frequency lower than or equal to it.
Clamp_min will set min frequency to different levels and check
if SLPC requests are higher or equal to those levels.
v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
v3: Checkpatch() corrections
v4: Remove unnecessary header file (Matthew Brost)
v5: checkpatch() and define const for 50/3 (Matthew Brost)
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730202119.23810-14-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure
for range checking while setting min/max frequencies.
Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes
made from userland. These are initially set to platform min
and max.
v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
v3: Formatting (Michal W)
v4: Add separate function to parse rp values (Michal W)
v5: Perform range checking for set min/max (Michal W)
v6: checkpatch() and rename static functions (Michal W)
v7: check ret code while setting SLPC limits (Michal W)
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730202119.23810-12-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
Add methods for interacting with GuC for enabling SLPC. Enable
SLPC after GuC submission has been established. GuC load will
fail if SLPC cannot be successfully initialized. Add various
helper methods to set/unset the parameters for SLPC. They can
be set using H2G calls or directly setting bits in the shared
data structure.
v2: Address several review comments, add new helpers for
decoding the SLPC min/max frequencies. Use masks instead of hardcoded
constants. (Michal W)
v3: Split global_state_to_string function, and check for positive
non-zero return value from intel_guc_send() (Michal W)
v4: Optimize the stringify function and other comments (Michal W)
v5: Enable slpc as well before declaring GuC submission status (Michal W)
v6: Checkpatch()
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210730202119.23810-6-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
