gm20b's FB has the same capabilities as gm200, minus the ability to
allocate RAM. Create a device that reflects this instead of re-using the
gk20a device which may be incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gk20a's FB is not special compared to other Kepler chips, besides the
fact it does not have VRAM. Use the regular gf100 hooks instead of the
incomplete versions we rewrote.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The gf100 constructor should be called, otherwise we will allocate a
smaller object than expected. This was without effect so far because
gk20a did not allocate a page, but with gf100's page allocation moved
to the oneinit() hook this problem has become apparent.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:56:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:99:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:271:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....
In fact, both functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_sddr3_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr2.c:60:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_sddr2_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....
In fact, these functions are declared in
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/firmware.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ram.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/volt/priv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/nv50.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.h.
So this patch adds missing header dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The 100c08 scratch page is mapped using dma_map_page() before the TTM
layer has had a chance to set the DMA mask. This means we are still
running with the default of 32 when this code executes, and this causes
problems for platforms with no memory below 4 GB (such as AMD Seattle)
So move the dma_map_page() to the .oneinit hook, which executes after the
DMA mask has been set.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The 100c10 scratch page is mapped using dma_map_page() before the TTM
layer has had a chance to set the DMA mask. This means we are still
running with the default of 32 when this code executes, and this causes
problems for platforms with no memory below 4 GB (such as AMD Seattle)
So move the dma_map_page() to the .oneinit hook, which executes after the
DMA mask has been set.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This enables memory reclocking on Maxwell. Sadly without a PMU firmware it
is useless for gm20x gpus.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GFxxx/GM1xx support the selection of 64/128KiB big pages globally.
GM2xx supports the same, as well as another mode where the page size
can be selected per-instance.
We default to 128KiB pages (With per-instance for GM200, but the current
code selects 128KiB there already) as the MMU code isn't currently able
to handle otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This patch uses an approach closer to the nvidia driver to configure
both PLLs for high gddr5 memory clocks (usually above 2400MHz)
Previously nouveau used the one PLL as it was used for the lower clocks
and just adjusted the second PLL to get as close as possible to the
requested clock. This means for my card, that I got a 4050 MHz clock
although 4008 MHz was requested.
Now the driver iterates over a list of PLL configuration also used by
the nvidia driver and then adjust the second PLL to get near the
requested clock. Also it hold to some restriction I found while
analyzing the PLL configurations
This won't fix all gddr5 high clock issues itself, but it should be
fine on hybrid gpu systems as found on many laptops these days. Also
switching while normal desktop usage should be a lot more stable than
before.
v2: move the pll code into ramgk104
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Avoids waiting for VBLANKS that never arrive on headless or otherwise
unconventional set-ups. Strategy taken from MEMX.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Tested-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
10053c is not even read on some cards, and I have no idea exactly what the
criteria are. Likely NVIDIA pre-scans the VBIOS and in their driver disables
all features that are never used. The practical effect should be the same
as this implementation though.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Tested-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Like Pierre's G94. We might want to structure Kepler similarly in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Tested-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Does not seem to be necessary for NVA0, hence untested by me.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Tested-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Seems to be mostly equal to DDR3 on < GT218, should improve stability for
DDR2 reclocks.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In preparation of changing FBVDDQ, as observed on at least one GDDR3 card.
While at it, adhere to func.log[1] properly for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.
The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist. This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
