This patch introduces default coherent DMA pool similar to default CMA
area concept. To keep other users safe code kept under CONFIG_ARM.
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
dma_declare_coherent_memory() and friends are designed to account
difference in CPU and device addresses. However, when it is used with
reserved memory regions there is assumption that CPU and device have
the same view on address space. This assumption gets invalid when
reserved memory for coherent DMA allocations is referenced by device
with non-empty "dma-range" property.
Simply feeding device address as rmem->base + dev->dma_pfn_offset
would not work due to reserved memory region can be shared, so this
patch turns device address to be expressed with help of CPU address
and device's dma_pfn_offset in case memory reservation has been done
via device tree; non device tree users continue to use the old scheme.
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Even though dma-noop-ops assumes 1:1 memory mapping DMA memory range
can be different to RAM. For example, ARM STM32F4 MCU offers the
possibility to remap SDRAM from 0xc000_0000 to 0x0 to get CPU
performance boost, but DMA continue to see SDRAM at 0xc000_0000. This
difference in mapping is handled via device-tree "dma-range" property
which leads to dev->dma_pfn_offset is set nonzero. To handle such
cases take dma_pfn_offset into account.
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
dmam_alloc_noncoherent is a trivial wrapper around dmam_alloc_attrs,
that hardcodes one particular flag. Make the devres code more
flexible by allowing the callers to pass arbitrary flags.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
After commit 9e442aa6a753 ("x86: remove DMA_ERROR_CODE"), the inlining
decisions in the qat driver changed slightly, introducing a new false-positive
warning:
drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c: In function 'qat_alg_sgl_to_bufl.isra.6':
include/linux/dma-mapping.h:228:2: error: 'sz_out' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_algs.c:676:9: note: 'sz_out' was declared here
The patch that introduced this is correct, so let's just avoid the
warning in this driver by rearranging the unwinding after an error
to make it more obvious to the compiler what is going on.
The problem here is the 'if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(dev, blp)))'
check, in which the 'unlikely' causes gcc to forget what it knew about
the state of the variables. Cleaning up the dma state in the reverse
order it was created means we can simplify the logic so it doesn't have
to know about that state, and also makes it easier to understand.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
au1100fb is using managed dma allocations, so it doesn't need to
explicitly free the dma memory in the error path (and if it did
it would have to use the managed version).
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
This code has been spread between getting in through arch trees, the iommu
tree, -mm and the drivers tree. There will be a lot of work in this area,
including consolidating various arch implementations into more common
code, so ensure we have a proper git tree that facilitates cooperation with
the architecture maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
By the time cell_pci_dma_dev_setup calls cell_dma_dev_setup no device can
have the fixed map_ops set yet as it's only set by the set_dma_mask
method. So move the setup for the fixed case to be only called in that
place instead of indirecting through cell_dma_dev_setup.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
And instead wire it up as method for all the dma_map_ops instances.
Note that this also means the arch specific check will be fully instead
of partially applied in the AMD iommu driver.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
And instead wire it up as method for all the dma_map_ops instances.
Note that the code seems a little fishy for dmabounce and iommu, but
for now I'd like to preserve the existing behavior 1:1.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This implementation is simply bogus - openrisc only has a simple
direct mapped DMA implementation and thus doesn't care about the
address.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This implementation is simply bogus - hexagon only has a simple
direct mapped DMA implementation and thus doesn't care about the
address.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Usually dma_supported decisions are done by the dma_map_ops instance.
Switch sparc to that model by providing a ->dma_supported instance for
sbus that always returns false, and implementations tailored to the sun4u
and sun4v cases for sparc64, and leave it unimplemented for PCI on
sparc32, which means always supported.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
DMA_ERROR_CODE is going to go away, so don't rely on it. Instead
define a ->mapping_error method for all IOMMU based dma operation
instances. The direct ops don't ever return an error and don't
need a ->mapping_error method.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
s390 can also use noop_dma_ops, and while that currently does not return
errors it will so in the future. Implementing the mapping_error method
is the proper way to have per-ops error conditions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
The dma alloc interface returns an error by return NULL, and the
mapping interfaces rely on the mapping_error method, which the dummy
ops already implement correctly.
Thus remove the DMA_ERROR_CODE define.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
DMA_ERROR_CODE is going to go away, so don't rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
ARM and x86 had duplicated versions of the dma_ops structure, the
only difference is that x86 hasn't wired up the set_dma_mask,
mmap, and get_sgtable ops yet. On x86 all of them are identical
to the generic version, so they aren't needed but harmless.
All the symbols used only for xen_swiotlb_dma_ops can now be marked
static as well.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
DMA_ERROR_CODE is not a public API and will go away soon. dma dma-iommu
driver already implements a proper ->mapping_error method, so it's only
using the value internally. Add a new local define using the value
that arm64 which is the only current user of dma-iommu.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
dev_addr isn't even a dma_addr_t, and DMA_ERROR_CODE has never been
a valid driver API. Add a bool mapped flag instead.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
DMA_ERROR_CODE already isn't a valid API to user for drivers and will
go away soon. exynos_drm_fb_dma_addr uses it a an error return when
the passed in index is invalid, but the callers never check for it
but instead pass the address straight to the hardware.
Add a WARN_ON instead and just return 0.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
DMA_ERROR_CODE is not a public API and will go away. Instead properly
unwind based on the loop counter.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
