NB: do we want btrfs_wait_ordered_range() on eviction of
inodes with positive i_nlink on subvolume with zero root_refs?
If not, btrfs_evict_inode() can be simplified by unconditionally
bailing out in case of i_nlink > 0 in the very beginning...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
In case of mode mismatch, do *not* blindly close the descriptor
another openers might be using right now. Open the underlying
file with currently sufficient mode, then
* if current mode has grown so that it's sufficient for
us now, just close our new fd
* if current mode has grown and our fd is *not* enough
to cover it, close and repeat.
* otherwise, install our fd if the file hadn't been
opened at all or dup2() our fd over the current one (and close
our fd).
Critical section is protected by mutex; yes, system-wide. All
we do under it is a bunch of comparison and maybe an overwriting
dup2() on host.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
calculating size, then doing allocation, then filling the
path is a Bad Idea(tm), since the ancestors can be renamed,
leading to buffer overrun.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
builds path relative to fs root, called under dcache_lock,
doesn't append any nonsense to unlinked ones.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We will calculate it in all callers anyway, so there's no
need to duplicate that inside. Moreover, that way we lose
all failure exits in init_inode(), so it doesn't need to
return anything.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There are only two call sites; in one (hostfs_iget()) it's actually
a no-op and in another (fill_super()) it's easier to expand the
damn thing and use what we know about its arguments to simplify
it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We need to wait for completion of possible writeback in progress
before we clear on-disk inode during deletion.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
simply don't hash the inodes that don't have real inumber instead of
skipping them during iget5_locked(); as the result, simple iget_locked()
would do and we can get rid of cramfs ->drop_inode() as well.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Essentially, the minimal variant of ->evict_inode(). It's
a trimmed-down clear_inode(), sans any fs callbacks. Once
it returns we know that no async writeback will be happening;
every ->evict_inode() instance should do that once and do that
before doing anything ->write_inode() could interfere with
(e.g. freeing the on-disk inode).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
All call chains to clear_inode() pass through evict_inode() and
clear_inode() should be called by evict_inode() exactly once.
So we can pull i_bdev/i_cdev detaching up to evict_inode() itself.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Hybrid of ->clear_inode() and ->delete_inode(); if present, does
all fs work to be done when in-core inode is about to be gone,
for whatever reason.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
