Check if the device has ACPI power resources so we can
enable runtime pm if so.
Acked-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In preparation for systems that support d3cold on dGPUs
independent of PX/HG. No functional change intended.
Acked-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5349:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_set_property'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5349:5:
warning: no previous prototype for function
'amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_set_property' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5373:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_get_property'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5373:5:
warning: no previous prototype for function
'amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_get_property' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
As these functions are only used inside amdgpu_dm.c, these can be
made static.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- Add new aux_channel_type
- Changed port_index to instance in dmub_cmd_dp_aux_control_data
- Change aux_return_code_type to sync up with driver
- param for ramping abm based on backlight level
Signed-off-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
The OGAM LUT precision was accumulating too much error
in the higher end.
[How]
Instead of calculating all points of the LUT in relation
to the previous ones, perform a full calculation in one
of the intermediate segments to stop error propagation.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Clark <Felipe.Clark@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Krunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
FP2 is not double buffered and must wait for VACTIVE
before programming.
[How]
Only update when there is a full update we should
change FP2 to avoid delay every flip.
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
race condition of programming FP2 wrt pipe locking
and vactive state can cause underflow/black screen
[How]
Enforce the FP2 is only programmed during vactive,
and unlock pipe soon afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <martin.leung@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
We are missing the DP info frame update on dcn30, and this will
lead to DP SDPs not being sent;
[How]
Add the DP info frame update for dcn30;
Signed-off-by: Leo (Hanghong) Ma <hanghong.ma@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Find out when we try to disable CRC calculation,
crc generation is still enabled. Main reason is
that dc_stream_configure_crc() will never get
called when the source is AMDGPU_DM_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_NONE.
[How]
Add checking condition that when source is
AMDGPU_DM_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_NONE, we should also call
dc_stream_configure_crc() to disable crc calculation.
Also, clean up crc window when disable crc calculation.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
There is a warning that triggers when pstate takes too long.
Pstate can take up to ~200us on Linux without hanging but
it is currently set to 40us.
[How]
Change the timeout for the warning to be 180us on Linux.
Signed-off-by: Victor Lu <victorchengchi.lu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
skip load smu and sdma fw on sriov due to sos,
ta and asd fw have been skipped for SIENNA_CICHLID.
V2:
move asic check into smu11
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
S0ix only makes sense on APUs since they are part of the platform, so
only when the ASIC is APU should set amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_supported flag
to deal with the related situation.
Signed-off-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Without doing the soft reset, register mmSDMA0_GFX_RB_WPTR's value could not be
reset to 0 when sdma block resumes. That would cause the ring buffer's read and
write pointers not equal and ring test fail. So add the soft reset step.
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Hou <Xiaomeng.Hou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The memblock code ignores any memory that doesn't fit in the
linear mapping. In order to preserve the distance between two physical
memory locations and their mappings in the linear map, any hole between
two memory regions occupies the same space in the linear map.
On most systems, this is hardly a problem (the memory banks are close
together, and VA_BITS represents a large space compared to the available
memory *and* the potential gaps).
On NUMA systems, things are quite different: the gaps between the
memory nodes can be pretty large compared to the memory size itself,
and the range from memblock_start_of_DRAM() to memblock_end_of_DRAM()
can exceed the space described by VA_BITS.
Unfortunately, we're not very good at making this obvious to the user,
and on a D05 system (two sockets and 4 nodes with 64GB each)
accidentally configured with 39bit VA, we display something like this:
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x1ffbffe100-0x1ffbffffff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x2febfc1100-0x2febfc2fff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 2 [<memory-less node>]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x2febfbf200-0x2febfc10ff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA(2) on node 1
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 3 [<memory-less node>]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x2febfbd300-0x2febfbf1ff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA(3) on node 1
which isn't very explicit, and doesn't tell the user why 128GB
have suddently disappeared.
Let's add a warning message telling the user that memory has been
truncated, and offer a potential solution (bumping VA_BITS up).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215152918.1511108-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity() already picks a
single target CPU out of the affinity mask and the actual target is stored
in the effective CPU mask, so destroying the user chosen affinity mask
which might contain more than one CPU is wrong.
Change the implementation so that the channel is bound to CPU0 at the XEN
level and leave the affinity mask alone. At startup of the interrupt
affinity will be assigned out of the affinity mask and the XEN binding will
be updated. Only keep the enforcement for real percpu interrupts.
On resume the overwrite is not required either because info->cpu and the
affinity mask are still the same as at the time of suspend. Same for
rebind_evtchn_irq().
This also prepares for proper interrupt spreading.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194045.250321315@linutronix.de
There is absolutely no reason to mimic the x86 deferred affinity
setting. This mechanism is required to handle the hardware induced issues
of IO/APIC and MSI and is not in use when the interrupts are remapped.
XEN does not need this and can simply change the affinity from the calling
context. The core code invokes this with the interrupt descriptor lock held
so it is fully serialized against any other operation.
Mark the interrupts with IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT to disable the deferred affinity
setting. The conditional mask/unmask operation is already handled in
xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu().
This makes XEN on x86 use the same mechanics as on e.g. ARM64 where
deferred affinity setting is not required and not implemented and the code
path in the ack functions is compiled out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194045.157601122@linutronix.de
This function can only ever work when the event channels:
- are already established
- interrupts assigned to them
- the affinity has been set by user space already
because any newly set up event channel is forced to be bound to CPU0 and
the affinity mask of the interrupt is forced to contain cpumask_of(0).
As the CPU0 enforcement was in place _before_ this was implemented it's
entirely unclear how that can ever have worked at all.
Remove it as preparation for doing it proper.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194045.065115500@linutronix.de
Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.
The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space,
but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set,
which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell
about the actual target CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.876342330@linutronix.de
No driver has any business with the internals of an interrupt
descriptor. Storing a pointer to it just to use yet another helper at the
actual usage site to retrieve the affinity mask is creative at best. Just
because C does not allow encapsulation does not mean that the kernel has no
limits.
Retrieve a pointer to the affinity mask itself and use that. It's still
using an interface which is usually not for random drivers, but definitely
less hideous than the previous hack.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.769458162@linutronix.de
Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.
The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space,
but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set,
which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell
about the actual target CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.672935978@linutronix.de
No driver has any business with the internals of an interrupt
descriptor. Storing a pointer to it just to use yet another helper at the
actual usage site to retrieve the affinity mask is creative at best. Just
because C does not allow encapsulation does not mean that the kernel has no
limits.
Retrieve a pointer to the affinity mask itself and use that. It's still
using an interface which is usually not for random drivers, but definitely
less hideous than the previous hack.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.580936243@linutronix.de
Going through a full irq descriptor lookup instead of just using the proper
helper function which provides direct access is suboptimal.
In fact it _is_ wrong because the chip callback needs to get the chip data
which is relevant for the chip while using the irq descriptor variant
returns the irq chip data of the top level chip of a hierarchy. It does not
matter in this case because the chip is the top level chip, but that
doesn't make it more correct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.473308721@linutronix.de
Going through a full irq descriptor lookup instead of just using the proper
helper function which provides direct access is suboptimal.
In fact it _is_ wrong because the chip callback needs to get the chip data
which is relevant for the chip while using the irq descriptor variant
returns the irq chip data of the top level chip of a hierarchy. It does not
matter in this case because the chip is the top level chip, but that
doesn't make it more correct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.364211860@linutronix.de
First of all drivers have absolutely no business to dig into the internals
of an irq descriptor. That's core code and subject to change. All of this
information is readily available to /proc/interrupts in a safe and race
free way.
Remove the inspection code which is a blatant violation of subsystem
boundaries and racy against concurrent modifications of the interrupt
descriptor.
Print the irq line instead so the information can be looked up in a sane
way in /proc/interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210194044.157283633@linutronix.de
