Let's continue introducing the generic ECC engine abstraction in the
NAND subsystem by instantiating a first ECC engine: the software
BCH one.
While at it, make a very tidy ecc_sw_bch_init() function and move all
the sanity checks and user input management in
nand_ecc_sw_bch_init_ctx(). This second helper will be called from the
raw RAND core.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Traditionally, Linux unlocks the whole flash because there are legacy
devices which has the write protection bits set by default at startup.
If you actually want to use the flash protection bits, eg. because there
is a read-only part for a bootloader, this automatic unlocking is
harmful. If there is no hardware write protection in place (usually
called WP#), a startup of the kernel just discards this protection.
I've gone through the datasheets of all the flashes (except the Intel
ones where I could not find any datasheet nor reference) which supports
the unlocking feature and looked how the sector protection was
implemented. The currently supported flashes can be divided into the
following two categories:
(1) block protection bits are non-volatile. Thus they keep their values
at reset and power-cycle
(2) flashes where these bits are volatile. After reset or power-cycle,
the whole memory array is protected.
(a) some devices needs a special "Global Unprotect" command, eg.
the Atmel AT25DF041A.
(b) some devices require to clear the BPn bits in the status
register.
Due to the reasons above, we do not want to clear the bits for flashes
which belong to category (1). Fortunately for us, only Atmel flashes
fall into category (2a). Implement the "Global Protect" and "Global
Unprotect" commands for these. For (2b) we can use normal block
protection locking scheme.
This patch adds a new flag to indicate the case (2). Only if we have
such a flash we unlock the whole flash array. To be backwards compatible
it also introduces a kernel configuration option which restores the
complete legacy behavior ("Disable write protection on any flashes").
Hopefully, this will clean up "unlock the entire flash for legacy
devices" once and for all.
For reference here are the actually commits which introduced the legacy
behavior (and extended the behavior to other chip manufacturers):
commit f80e521c91 ("mtd: m25p80: add support for the Intel/Numonyx {16,32,64}0S33B SPI flash chips")
commit ea60658a08 ("mtd: m25p80: disable SST software protection bits by default")
commit 7228982442 ("[MTD] m25p80: fix bug - ATmel spi flash fails to be copied to")
Actually, this might also fix handling of the Atmel AT25DF flashes,
because the original commit 7228982442 ("[MTD] m25p80: fix bug -
ATmel spi flash fails to be copied to") was writing a 0 to the status
register, which is a "Global Unprotect". This might not be the case in
the current code which only handles the block protection bits BP2, BP1
and BP0. Thus, it depends on the current contents of the status register
if this unlock actually corresponds to a "Global Unprotect" command. In
the worst case, the current code might leave the AT25DF flashes in a
write protected state.
The commit 191f5c2ed4 ("mtd: spi-nor: use 16-bit WRR command when QE
is set on spansion flashes") changed that behavior by just clearing BP2
to BP0 instead of writing a 0 to the status register.
Further, the commit 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling
of block write protection") expanded the unlock_all() feature to ANY
flash which supports locking.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-8-michael@walle.cc
For the Atmel and SST parts this flag was already moved to individual
flash parts because it is considered bad esp. because newer flash chips
will automatically inherit the "has locking" support. While this won't
likely be the case for the Intel parts, we do it for consistency
reasons.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-6-michael@walle.cc
This is considered bad for the following reasons:
(1) We only support the block protection with BPn bits for write
protection. Not all SST parts support this.
(2) Newly added flash chip will automatically inherit the "has
locking" support and thus needs to explicitly tested. Better
be opt-in instead of opt-out.
(3) There are already supported flashes which doesn't support
the locking scheme. So I assume this wasn't properly tested
before adding that chip; which enforces my previous argument
that locking support should be an opt-in.
Remove the global flag and add individual flags to all flashes
which supports BP locking. In particular the following flashes
don't support the BP scheme:
- SST26VF016B
- SST26WF016B
- SST26VF064B
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-5-michael@walle.cc
This is considered bad for the following reasons:
(1) We only support the block protection with BPn bits for write
protection. Not all Atmel parts support this.
(2) Newly added flash chip will automatically inherit the "has
locking" support and thus needs to explicitly tested. Better
be opt-in instead of opt-out.
(3) There are already supported flashes which doesn't support
the locking scheme. So I assume this wasn't properly tested
before adding that chip; which enforces my previous argument
that locking support should be an opt-in.
Remove the global flag and add individual flags to all flashes which
supports BP locking. In particular the following flashes don't support
the BP scheme:
- AT26F004
- AT25SL321
- AT45DB081D
Please note, that some flashes which are marked as SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK just
support Global Protection, i.e. not our supported block protection
locking scheme. This is to keep backwards compatibility with the
current "unlock all at boot" mechanism. In particular the following
flashes doesn't have BP bits:
- AT25DF041A
- AT25DF321
- AT25DF321A
- AT25DF641
- AT26DF081A
- AT26DF161A
- AT26DF321
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-4-michael@walle.cc
Just try to unlock the whole SPI-NOR flash array. Don't abort the
probing in case of an error. Justifications:
(1) For some boards, this just works because
spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() is broken and just checks the
second half of the 16bit. Once that will be fixed, SPI probe will
fail for boards which has hardware-write protected SPI-NOR flashes.
(2) Until now, hardware write-protection was the only viable solution
to use the block protection bits. This is because this very
function spi_nor_unlock_all() will be called unconditionally on
every linux boot. Therefore, this bits only makes sense in
combination with the hardware write-protection. If we would fail
the SPI probe on an error in spi_nor_unlock_all() we'd break
virtually all users of the block protection bits.
(3) We should try hard to keep the MTD working even if the flash might
not be writable/erasable.
Fixes: 3e0930f109 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-3-michael@walle.cc
Some flashes like the Cypress S28 family use ECC. Under this ECC scheme,
multi-pass writes to an ECC block is not allowed. In other words, once
data is programmed to an ECC block, it can't be programmed again without
erasing it first.
Upper layers like file systems need to be given this information so they
do not cause error conditions on the flash by attempting multi-pass
programming. This can be done by setting 'writesize' in 'struct
mtd_info'.
Set the default to 1 but allow flashes to modify it in fixup hooks. If
more flashes show up with this constraint in the future it might be
worth it to add it to 'struct flash_info', but for now increasing its
size is not worth it.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201102711.8727-3-p.yadav@ti.com
sparse is unhappy with us casting the __iomem address space pointer to
a type with no address space attribute specified:
"sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)"
>> drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c:78:18: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
Indeed we perform the __iomem-less type casting but to an integer
variable. The integer variable isn't dereferenced then, so the casting is
safe and won't cause any problem. But in order to make sparse happy and
keep the code coherent let's fix the warning by converting the local
"shift" and "chunk" variables to the "unsigned int" type (since their
value won't ever exceed three) and cast the __iomem-pointers to uintptr_t.
Add the same fix to the bt1_rom_map_read() method for unification.
Fixes: b3e79e7682 ("mtd: physmap: Add Baikal-T1 physically mapped ROM support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202011021254.XC70BaQT-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201125072640.23516-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Some devices (especially QCA ones) are already using hardcoded partition
names with colons in it. The OpenMesh A62 for example provides following
mtd relevant information via cmdline:
root=31:11 mtdparts=spi0.0:256k(0:SBL1),128k(0:MIBIB),384k(0:QSEE),64k(0:CDT),64k(0:DDRPARAMS),64k(0:APPSBLENV),512k(0:APPSBL),64k(0:ART),64k(custom),64k(0:KEYS),0x002b0000(kernel),0x00c80000(rootfs),15552k(inactive) rootfsname=rootfs rootwait
The change to split only on the last colon between mtd-id and partitions
will cause newpart to see following string for the first partition:
KEYS),0x002b0000(kernel),0x00c80000(rootfs),15552k(inactive)
Such a partition list cannot be parsed and thus the device fails to boot.
Avoid this behavior by making sure that the start of the first part-name
("(") will also be the last byte the mtd-id split algorithm is using for
its colon search.
Fixes: eb13fa0227 ("mtd: parser: cmdline: Support MTD names containing one or more colons")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201124062506.185392-1-sven@narfation.org
Switch the block device lookup interfaces to directly work with a dev_t
so that struct block_device references are only acquired by the
blkdev_get variants (and the blk-cgroup special case). This means that
we now don't need an extra reference in the inode and can generally
simplify handling of struct block_device to keep the lookups contained
in the core block layer code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
These functions must be usable by the main NAND core, so their names
must be technology-agnostic as well as the parameters. Hence, we pass
a generic nand_device instead of a raw nand_chip structure.
As it seems that changing the raw NAND functions to always pass a
generic NAND device is a lost of time, we prefer to create dedicated
raw NAND wrappers that will be useful in the near future to do the
translation.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Currently, BCH and Hamming engine are sharing the same
tweaking/restoring I/O mechanism: they need the I/O request to fully
cover the main/OOB area. Let's make this code generic as sharing the
code between two drivers is already a win. Maybe other ECC engine
drivers will need it too.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'section' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:140: warning: Function parameter or member 'oobregion' not described in 'onenand_ooblayout_32_64_ecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1436: warning: bad line:
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Function parameter or member 'ops' not described in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'len' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'retlen' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:1971: warning: Excess function parameter 'mode' description in 'onenand_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2156: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_size' not described in 'onenand_multiblock_erase'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2156: warning: Excess function parameter 'region' description in 'onenand_multiblock_erase'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Function parameter or member 'ops' not described in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'len' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'retlen' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:2771: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'onenand_otp_write_oob_nolock'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3387: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'flexonenand_get_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3387: warning: Excess function parameter 'onenand_info' description in 'flexonenand_get_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3509: warning: Function parameter or member 'mtd' not described in 'flexonenand_check_blocks_erased'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3509: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd_info' description in 'flexonenand_check_blocks_erased'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'die' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'boundary' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3557: warning: Function parameter or member 'lock' not described in 'flexonenand_set_boundary'
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-23-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:191: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'omap_prefetch_enable'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:221: warning: Function parameter or member 'cs' not described in 'omap_prefetch_reset'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:221: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'omap_prefetch_reset'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:946: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_enable_hwecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:946: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_enable_hwecc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1017: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_dev_ready'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1017: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_dev_ready'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1036: warning: Function parameter or member 'chip' not described in 'omap_enable_hwecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1036: warning: Excess function parameter 'mtd' description in 'omap_enable_hwecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1142: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in '_omap_calculate_ecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1142: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in '_omap_calculate_ecc_bch'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1270: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_sw'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1270: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_sw'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1284: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_calc' not described in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_multi'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1284: warning: Excess function parameter 'ecc_code' description in 'omap_calculate_ecc_bch_multi'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'is_elm_present'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Function parameter or member 'elm_node' not described in 'is_elm_present'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c:1681: warning: Excess function parameter 'omap_nand_info' description in 'is_elm_present'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Jian Zhang <jzhang@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-20-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_steps' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_step_size' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:102: warning: Function parameter or member 'ecc_syndrome_size' not described in 'elm_config'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:440: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'elm_context_save'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:488: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'elm_context_restore'
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-19-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1854: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmd' not described in 'brcmnand_edu_trans'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'desc' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'dma_cmd' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'begin' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'end' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1951: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_desc' not described in 'brcmnand_fill_dma_desc'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1977: warning: Function parameter or member 'host' not described in 'brcmnand_dma_run'
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c:1977: warning: Function parameter or member 'desc' not described in 'brcmnand_dma_run'
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201109182206.3037326-14-lee.jones@linaro.org
