The block comment for cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs() has a wonderful
diagram, but although it is marked up as kerneldoc does not use the
markup for providing the function definition.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'pipe' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'id' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6341: warning: Function parameter or member 'set' not described in 'cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021185649.17759-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
There is no GEN6_RPSTAT1 on ILK. Instead of reading that let's
try to get the same information from MEMSTAT_ILK. At least it
seems to track MEMSWCTL frequency request perfectly on my ILK.
It needs the same invert trick as the request value.
We don't want to put the invert thing into intel_gpu_freq()
and intel_freq_opcode() because that would incorrectly invert
the min/max/etc frequencies also.
One day someone might want to reverse engineer the formula for
converting these numbers to Hz, but for now we'll just report
them raw.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021131443.25616-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Running "make htmldocs: produce lots of warnings on those files:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:211: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:211: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:211: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:177: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c:211: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:90: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:90: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:134: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:90: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:90: warning: Excess function parameter 'p_size' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c:134: warning: Excess function parameter 'man' description in 'amdgpu_gtt_mgr_fini'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:675: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'amdgpu_device_asic_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:675: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'amdgpu_device_asic_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:675: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'amdgpu_device_asic_init'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:675: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'amdgpu_device_asic_init'
They're related to the repacement of some parameters by adev,
and due to a few renamed parameters.
While here, uniform the name of the parameter for it to be
the same on all functions using a pointer to struct amdgpu_device.
Update the kernel-doc documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Return statements for functions returning bool should use truth
and false instead of 1 and 0 respectively.
Modify cik_event_interrupt.c to return false instead of 0.
Issue found with Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
fix the wrong fan speed in fan1_input when the fan control mode is manual.
the fan speed value is not correct when we set manual mode to fan1_enalbe - 1.
since the fan speed in the metrics table always reflects the real fan speed,we
can fetch the fan speed for both auto and manual mode.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As far a I can tell uses a variant of DCN3xx which uses num_pkrs.
If we do not initialize the variable we will set the register field
to ilog2(0) = -1, though the mask will reduce that to 7. Pretty sure
7 is not the value we want here.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
0 causes instruction fetch stall at cache line boundary under some
conditions on Navi10. A non-zero prefetch is the preferred default
in any case.
Fixes soft hang in Luxmark.
Signed-off-by: Jay Cornwall <jay.cornwall@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. when smc feature bit isn't mapped,
the feature state isn't showed on sysfs node of pp_features.
2. add pp_features table title
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Restore RPS for ILK-M. We lost it when an extra HAS_RPS()
check appeared in intel_rps_enable().
Unfortunaltey this just makes the performance worse on my
ILK because intel_ips insists on limiting the GPU freq to
the minimum. If we don't do the RPS init then intel_ips will
not limit the frequency for whatever reason. Either it can't
get at some required information and thus makes wrong decisions,
or we mess up some weights/etc. and cause it to make the wrong
decisions when RPS init has been done, or the entire thing is
just wrong. Would require a bunch of reverse engineering to
figure out what's going on.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: 9c878557b1 ("drm/i915/gt: Use the RPM config register to determine clk frequencies")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021131443.25616-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm
max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit
in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or
allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should
already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check.
v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which
is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the
largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris)
Fixes: b908be543e ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
In order to test how fast the heartbeat can respond, we measure with the
interval set to its minimum. Before we measure though, we want to be
sure we start with a fresh pulse, and so wait until any old one is
complete. During that wait though, we were continually flushing the
work, and so continually re-evaluating to see if the pulse was complete,
and each attempt would count as an unresponsive system. If the engine
did not complete the request in the couple of busy-spins, it would flag
an error. This is unfortunate, so let's not busy-spin waiting for the
old heartbeat, but terminate it and start afresh.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201019142841.32273-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
GEN >= 10 hardware supports the programmable scaler filter.
Attach scaling filter property for CRTC and plane for GEN >= 10
hardwares and program scaler filter based on the selected filter
type.
changes since v3:
* None
changes since v2:
* Use updated functions
* Add ps_ctrl var to contain the full PS_CTRL register value (Ville)
* Duplicate the scaling filter in crtc and plane hw state (Ville)
changes since v1:
* None
Changes since RFC:
* Enable properties for GEN >= 10 platforms (Ville)
* Do not round off the crtc co-ordinate (Danial Stone, Ville)
* Add new functions to handle scaling filter setup (Ville)
* Remove coefficient set 0 hardcoding.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201020161427.6941-5-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Integer scaling (IS) is a nearest-neighbor upscaling technique that
simply scales up the existing pixels by an integer
(i.e., whole number) multiplier.Nearest-neighbor (NN) interpolation
works by filling in the missing color values in the upscaled image
with that of the coordinate-mapped nearest source pixel value.
Both IS and NN preserve the clarity of the original image. Integer
scaling is particularly useful for pixel art games that rely on
sharp, blocky images to deliver their distinctive look.
Introduce functions to configure the scaler filter coefficients to
enable nearest-neighbor filtering.
Bspec: 49247
changes since v6:
* Trust compiler, remove pointless inline keyword from cnl_coef_tap()
& cnl_nearest_filter_coef() functions (Ville)
changes since v4:
* Make cnl_coef_tap(), cnl_nearest_filter_coef() inline (Uma)
changes since v3:
* None
changes since v2:
* Move APIs from 5/5 into this patch.
* Change filter programming related function names to cnl_*, move
filter select bits related code into inline function (Ville)
changes since v1:
* Rearrange skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() to iterate the
registers directly instead of the phases and taps (Ville)
changes since RFC:
* Refine the skl_scaler_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter() logic (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201020161427.6941-4-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Introduce per-plane and per-CRTC scaling filter properties to allow
userspace to select the driver's default scaling filter or
Nearest-neighbor(NN) filter for upscaling operations on CRTC and
plane.
Drivers can set up this property for a plane by calling
drm_plane_create_scaling_filter() and for a CRTC by calling
drm_crtc_create_scaling_filter().
NN filter works by filling in the missing color values in the upscaled
image with that of the coordinate-mapped nearest source pixel value.
NN filter for integer multiple scaling can be particularly useful for
for pixel art games that rely on sharp, blocky images to deliver their
distinctive look.
changes since: v6:
* Move property doc to existing "Standard CRTC Properties" and
"Plane Composition Properties" doc comments (Simon)
changes since v3:
* Refactor code, add new function for common code (Ville)
changes since v2:
* Create per-plane and per-CRTC scaling filter property (Ville)
changes since v1:
* None
changes since RFC:
* Add separate properties for plane and CRTC (Ville)
Link: https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/18194
Link: https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/18567
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201020161427.6941-2-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
