SOR_PWR has no effect to power-off DP links, unlike other SOR protocols.
Instead, on the source side, we cut power to the lanes after having put
the sink into D3. Link training takes care of everything required to
bring it back again.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This previously worked for the most part due to userspace doing a
modeset in response to HPD interrupts. This will allow us to
properly handle cases where sync is lost for other reasons, or if
userspace isn't caring.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will, at some point, be used to replace various bits and pieces of
code doing direct bios parsing. For now, it'll just be used for some
DP improvements.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's also provisions to allow a pad to be locked with a specific
routing, for an indefinite period of time. This will be used in
future patches.
The G94+ pad driver will now also power-down pads when not required.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This was a half-finished hack before, just enough to handle the shared
aux/i2c pad thing on G94 and up.
We got lucky with locking etc up until now, as this was (generally) all
protected by the DRM mode_config lock. It's about to become a lot more
likely to hit the races.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Re-uses the implementation's accessor functions rather than requiring
and init/fini implementation for each chipset.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This fixes hangs on GK208 which happen instantaneously on trying to use a
geometry shader.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.14+
Cards with nv04 display engine can't reliably use vblank
counts and timestamps computed via drm_handle_vblank(), as
the function gets invoked after sending the pageflip events.
Fix this by defaulting to the old crtcid = -1 fallback path
on <= NV-50 cards, and only using the precise path on NV-50
and later.
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+
Whenever a single nouveau_mc_intr() main gpu irq-handler invocation was
responsible for calling both, the vblank-irq handler (display engine irq)
and kms-pageflip completion handler (from fifo irq), the order of
invocation was wrong. nouveau_finish_flip() was called before
drm_handle_vblank() for the vblank of pageflip completion, so the
emitted pageflip event contained stale vblank count and timestamp
from previous vblank. This caused failure in userspace to timestamp
properly.
Reorder order of invocation of engine irq handlers: Put
NVDEV_ENGINE_DISP always on top, and thereby before NVDEV_ENGINE_FIFO,
so that drm_handle_vblank() gets called to update vblank timestamps
and count before potential pageflip events make use of that
information.
This works on nv-50 and later, where kms-pageflip completion triggers
an irq either after a separate vblank irq, or both pageflip and vblank
trigger one common irq invocation, but never before vblank irqs.
v2 (Ben):
- removed mods for nv04-nv40, it doesn't help there anyway
- this is considered a hack, and a better solution should be found
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+
nv04_disp_scanoutpos() must abort to trigger simple timestamping
fallback if vtotal/htotal regs return zero. This happens if the
output isn't a digital output, but a vga analog output, as the
regs don't get initialized in that case.
Fixes timestamping failure on nv-40 and earlier with vga output.
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some adt7473 can't manage the 20µs delay we use for the bitbanging, bumping
it to 40µs seem to do the trick.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Tested-by: Marcel Dopita <mdop@seznam.cz>
I spent some time this weekend trying to find in the vbios the number of
pulses per revolutions in the vbios but couldn't find it. It would seem
all my cards have 2 pulses per revolution so let's stick to that until
further notice.
Thermal table's id 0x48 may indicate this information but it would seem
that changing the value results in the blob power or clock gating the
RPM counter... We should ask NVIDIA about that, should be trivial-enough
for them to answer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
