The intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern() function gets invoked through the
compliance test handler on a HPD short pulse if the test type is
set to DP_TEST_VIDEO_PATTERN. This performs the DPCD registers
reads to read the requested test pattern, video pattern resolution,
frame rate and bits per color value. The results of this analysis
are handed off to userspace so that the userspace app can set the
video pattern mode appropriately for the test result/response.
When the test is requested with specific BPC value, we read the BPC
value from the DPCD register. If this BPC value in intel_dp structure
has a non-zero value and we're on a display port connector, then we use
the value to calculate the bpp for the pipe. Also in this case if its
a 18bpp video pattern request, then we force the dithering on pipe to be
disabled since it causes CRC mismatches.
The compliance_test_active flag is set at the end of the individual
test handling functions. This is so that the kernel-side operations
can be completed without the risk of interruption from the userspace
app that is polling on that flag.
v5:
* Remove test_result variable
* Populate the compliance test data at the end of the function (Jani Nikula)
v4:
*Return TEST_NAK on read failures and invalid values (Jani Nikula)
* Address CRC mismatch errors
v3:
* Use the updated properly shifted bit definitions (Jani Nikula)
* Force dithering to be disabled on 18bpp compliance
test request (Manasi Navare)
v2:
* Updated the DPCD Register reads based on proper defines in header (Jani Nikula)
* Squahsed the patch that forced the pipe bpp to compliance test bpp (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1485274909-17470-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
This patch adds support to handle automated DP compliance
link training test requests. This patch has been tested with
Unigraf DPR-120 DP Compliance device for testing Link
Training Compliance.
After we get a short pulse Compliance test request, test
request values are read and hotplug uevent is sent in order
to trigger another modeset during which the pipe is configured
and link is retrained and enabled for link parameters requested
by the test.
v5:
* Only modify the compliance structure after all validation
is done (Jani Nikula)
* Remove the variable test_result (Jani Nikula)
v4:
* Return TEST_NAK for read failures and invalid
values (Jani Nikula)
* Conver the test link BW to link rate before storing (Jani Nikula)
v3:
* Validate the test link rate and lane count as soon as
the request comes (Jani Nikula)
v2:
* Validate the test lane count before using it in
intel_dp_compute_config (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1485274594-17361-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Along with GLK it was introduced the .is_lp and IS_GEN9_LP.
So, following the same simplification standard we can
put Skylake and Kabylake under the same bucket for most
of the things.
So let's add the IS_GEN9_BC for "Big Core" (non Atom based
platforms).
The i915_drv.c was let out of this patch on purpose
because that is really a decision per platform, just like
other cases where IS_KABYLAKE is different from IS_SKYLAKE.
v2: fix conflict with IS_LP and 3 new cases for this
big core bucket:
- intel_ddi.c: intel_ddi_get_link_dpll
- intel_fbc.c: find_compression_threshold
- i915_gem_gtt.c: gtt_write_workarounds
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1485196357-30599-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Apparently some VLV BIOSen like to leave the VDD force bit enabled
even for power seqeuncers that aren't properly hooked up to any
port. That will result in a imbalance in the AUX power domain
refcount when we stat to use said power sequencer as edp_panel_vdd_on()
will not grab the power domain reference if it sees that the VDD is
already on.
To fix this let's make sure we turn off the VDD force bit when we
initialize the power sequencer registers. That is, unless it's
being done from the init path since there we are actually
initializing the registers for the current power sequencer and
we don't want to turn VDD off needlessly as that would require
waiting for the power cycle delay before we turn it back on.
This fixes the following kind of warnings:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 123 at ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c:1455 intel_display_power_put+0x13a/0x170 [i915]()
WARN_ON(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain])
...
v2: Fix typos in comment (David)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98695
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161220165117.24801-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
VLV apparently gets upset if the PPS for a pipe currently driving an
external DP port gets used for VDD stuff on another eDP port. The DP
port falls over and fails to retrain when this happens, leaving the
user staring at a black screen.
Let's fix it by also tracking which pipe is driving which DP/eDP port.
We'll track this under intel_dp so that we'll share the protection
of the pps_mutex alongside the pps_pipe tracking, since the two
things are intimately related.
I had plans to reduce the protection of pps_mutex to cover only eDP
ports, but with this we can't do that. Well, for for VLV/CHV at least.
For other platforms it should still be possible, which would allow
AUX communication to occur in parallel for multiple DP ports.
v2: Drop stray crap from a comment (Imre)
Grab pps_mutex when clearing active_pipe
Fix a typo in the commit message
v3: Make vlv_active_pipe() static
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1481738423-29738-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
If link training fails, then we need to fallback to lower
link rate first and if link training fails at RBR, then
fallback to lower lane count.
This function finds the next lower link rate/lane count
value after link training failure and limits the max
link_rate and lane_count values to these fallback values.
v7:
* Remove unnecessary intializations and remove redundant
call to intel_dp_common_rates (Jani Nikula)
v6:
* Cap the max link rate and lane count to the max
values obtained during fallback link training (Daniel Vetter)
v5:
* Start the fallback at the lane count value passed not
the max lane count (Jani Nikula)
v4:
* Remove the redundant variable link_train_failed
v3:
* Remove fallback_link_rate_index variable, just obtain
that using the helper intel_dp_link_rate_index (Jani Nikula)
v2:
Squash the patch that returns the link rate index (Jani Nikula)
Acked-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1481252712-12925-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Not validating the mode rate against max. link rate results in not pruning
invalid modes. For e.g, a HBR2 5.4 Gbps 2-lane configuration does not
support 4k@60Hz. But, we do not reject this mode.
So, make use of the helpers in intel_dp to validate mode data rate against
max. link data rate of a configuration.
v3: Renamed local variables again for consistency (Manasi)
v2: Renamed mode data rate local variable to be more explanatory.
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479243546-17189-1-git-send-email-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
We store DP link rates as link clock frequencies in kHz, just like all
other clock values. But, DP link rates in the DP Spec. are expressed in
Gbps/lane, which seems to have led to some confusion.
E.g., for HBR2
Max. data rate = 5.4 Gbps/lane x 4 lane x 8/10 x 1/8 = 2160000 kBps
where, 8/10 is for channel encoding and 1/8 is for bit to Byte conversion
Using link clock frequency, like we do
Max. data rate = 540000 kHz * 4 lanes = 2160000 kSymbols/s
Because, each symbol has 8 bit of data, this is 2160000 kBps
and there is no need to account for channel encoding here.
But, currently we do 540000 kHz * 4 lanes * (8/10) = 1728000 kBps
Similarly, while computing the required link bandwidth for a mode,
there is a mysterious 1/10 term.
This should simply be pixel_clock kHz * (bpp/8) to give the final result in
kBps
v2: Changed to DIV_ROUND_UP() and comment changes (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479160220-17794-1-git-send-email-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Geminilake is mostly backwards compatible with broxton, so change most
of the IS_BROXTON() checks to IS_GEN9_LP(). Differences between the
platforms will be implemented in follow-up patches.
v2: Don't reuse broxton's path in intel_update_max_cdclk().
Don't set plane count as in broxton.
v3: Rebase
v4: Include the check intel_bios_is_port_hpd_inverted().
Commit message.
v5: Leave i915_dmc_info() out; glk's csr version != bxt's. (Rodrigo)
v6: Rebase.
v7: Convert a few mode IS_BROXTON() occurances in pps, ddi, dsi and pll
code. (Rodrigo)
v8: Squash a couple of DDI patches with more conversions. (Rodrigo)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480667037-11215-2-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
Some LSPCON adaptors may return an incorrect LSPCON mode right after
waking from DP Sleep state. This is the case at least for the ParadTech
PS175 adaptor, both when waking because of exiting the DP Sleep to
active state, or due to any other AUX CH transfer. We can determine the
current expected mode based on whether the DPCD area is accessible,
since according to the LSPCON spec this area is only accesible
in PCON mode.
This wait will avoid us trying to change the mode, while the current
expected mode hasn't settled yet and start link training before the
adaptor thinks it's in PCON mode after waking from DP Sleep state.
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479755707-29596-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
A small selection of macros which can only accept dev_priv from
now on and a resulting trickle of fixups.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
On my APL the LSPCON firmware resumes in PCON mode as opposed to the
expected LS mode. It also appears to be in a state where AUX DPCD reads
will succeed but return garbage recovering only after a few hundreds of
milliseconds. After the recovery time DPCD reads will result in the
correct values and things will continue to work. If I2C over AUX is
attempted during this recovery time (implying an AUX write transaction)
the firmware won't recover and will stay in this broken state.
As a workaround check if the firmware is in PCON state after resume and
if so wait until the correct DPCD values are returned. For this we
compare the branch descriptor with the one we cached during init time.
If the firmware was in the LS state, we skip the w/a and continue as
before.
v2:
- Use the DP descriptor value cached in intel_dp. (Jani)
- Get to intel_dp using container_of(), instead of a cached ptr.
(Shashank)
- Use usleep_range() instead of msleep().
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98353
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477326811-30431-9-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
Currently it's entirely possible to go through the link training step
without first determining the lane_count, which is silly since we end up
doing a bunch of aux transfers of size = 0, as highlighted by
WARN_ON(!msg->buffer != !msg->size), and can only ever result in a
'failed to update link training' message. This can be observed during
intel_dp_long_pulse where we can do the link training step, but before
we have had a chance to set the link params. To avoid this we add an
extra check for the lane_count in intel_dp_check_link_status, which
should prevent us from doing the link training step prematurely.
v2: add WARN_ON_ONCE and FIXME comment (Ville)
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97344
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476912593-10019-1-git-send-email-matthew.auld@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
The VBT provides the platform a way to mix and match the DDI ports vs.
AUX channels. Currently we only trust the VBT for DDI E, which has no
corresponding AUX channel of its own. However it is possible that some
board might use some non-standard DDI vs. AUX port routing even for
the other ports. Perhaps for signal routing reasons or something,
So let's generalize this and trust the VBT for all ports.
For now we'll limit this to DDI platforms, as we trust the VBT a bit
more there anyway when it comes to the DDI ports. I've structured
the code in a way that would allow us to easily expand this to
other platforms as well, by simply filling in the ddi_port_info.
v2: Drop whitespace changes, keep MISSING_CASE() for unknown
aux ch assignment, include a commit message, include debug
message during init
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476208368-5710-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
