The Hinge sensor is a common custom sensor on laptops. It calculates
the angle between the lid (screen) and the base (keyboard). In addition,
it also exposes screen and the keyboard angles with respect to the
ground. Applications can easily get laptop's status in space through
this sensor, in order to display appropriate user interface.
Signed-off-by: Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215054444.9324-3-xiang.ye@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Currently custom sensors properties are not decoded and it is up to
user space to interpret.
Some manufacturers already standardized the meaning of some custom sensors.
They can be presented as a proper IIO sensor. We can identify these sensors
based on manufacturer and serial number property in the report.
This change is identifying hinge sensor when the manufacturer is "INTEL".
This creates a platform device so that a sensor driver can be loaded to
process these sensors.
Signed-off-by: Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215054444.9324-2-xiang.ye@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() instead of open-coding it. This makes it more clear
what is going on for the casual reviewer.
Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@@
expression x, y;
@@
-((x) + ((y) / 2)) / (y)
+DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, y)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201222191618.3433-1-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This adds an IIO magnetometer driver for the Yamaha
YAS530 family of magnetometer/compass chips YAS530,
YAS532 and YAS533.
A quick survey of the source code released by different
vendors reveal that we have these variants in the family
with some deployments listed:
* YAS529 MS-3C (2005 Samsung Aries)
* YAS530 MS-3E (2011 Samsung Galaxy S Advance)
* YAS532 MS-3R (2011 Samsung Galaxy S4)
* YAS533 MS-3F (Vivo 1633, 1707, V3, Y21L)
* (YAS534 is a magnetic switch)
* YAS535 MS-6C
* YAS536 MS-3W
* YAS537 MS-3T (2015 Samsung Galaxy S6, Note 5)
* YAS539 MS-3S (2018 Samsung Galaxy A7 SM-A750FN)
The YAS529 is so significantly different from the
YAS53x variants that it will require its own driver.
The YAS537 and YAS539 have slightly different register
sets but have strong similarities so a common driver
patching this one will probably be reasonable.
The source code for Samsung Galaxy A7's YAS539 is not
that is significantly different from the YAS530 in the
Galaxy S Advance, so I believe we will only need this
one driver with quirks to handle all of them.
The YAS539 is actively announced on Yamaha's devices
site:
https://device.yamaha.com/en/lsi/products/e_compass/
This is a driver written from scratch using buffered
IIO and runtime PM handling regulators and reset.
Thanks to Andy Shevchenko for great help in finding all
the special kernel infrastructure functions and quirks
during review of this driver.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201224120820.1120099-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() instead of open-coding it. This documents intent
and makes it more clear what is going on for the casual reviewer.
Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@r1@
expression x;
constant C1;
constant C2;
@@
((x) + C1) / C2
@script:python@
C1 << r1.C1;
C2 << r1.C2;
@@
try:
if int(C1) * 2 != int(C2):
cocci.include_match(False)
except:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
expression r1.x;
constant r1.C1;
constant r1.C2;
@@
-(((x) + C1) / C2)
+DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, C2)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201227171126.28216-3-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() instead of open-coding it. This documents intent
and makes it more clear what is going on for the casual reviewer.
Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@r1@
expression x;
constant C1;
constant C2;
@@
((x) + C1) / C2
@script:python@
C1 << r1.C1;
C2 << r1.C2;
@@
try:
if int(C1) * 2 != int(C2):
cocci.include_match(False)
except:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
expression r1.x;
constant r1.C1;
constant r1.C2;
@@
-(((x) + C1) / C2)
+DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, C2)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201227171126.28216-2-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() instead of open-coding it. This documents intent
and makes it more clear what is going on for the casual reviewer.
Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch.
// <smpl>
@r1@
expression x;
constant C1;
constant C2;
@@
((x) + C1) / C2
@script:python@
C1 << r1.C1;
C2 << r1.C2;
@@
try:
if int(C1) * 2 != int(C2):
cocci.include_match(False)
except:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
expression r1.x;
constant r1.C1;
constant r1.C2;
@@
-(((x) + C1) / C2)
+DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, C2)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201227171126.28216-1-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The iio-core extends the attr_group provided by the driver with its
own attributes. To be able to do this it:
1. Has its own (non const) io_dev_opaque.chan_attr_group attr_group struct
2. It allocates a new attrs array with room for both the drivers and its
own attributes
3. It copies over the driver provided attributes into the newly allocated
attrs array.
But the drivers attr_group may contain more then just the attrs array, it
may also contain an is_visible callback and at least the adi-axi-adc.c
is currently defining such a callback.
Change the attr_group copying code to also copy over the is_visible
callback, so that drivers can define one and have it workins as is
normal for attr_group-s all over the kernel.
Note that the is_visible callback takes an index into the array as
argument, so that indices of the driver's attributes must not change,
this is not a problem as the driver's own attributes are added first
to the newly allocated attrs array and the attributes handled by the
core are appended after the driver's attributes.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201125084606.11404-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The xilinx-xadc IIO driver currently has support for the XADC in the Xilinx
7 series FPGAs. The system-monitor is the equivalent to the XADC in the
Xilinx UltraScale and UltraScale+ FPGAs.
The IP designers did a good job at maintaining backwards compatibility and
only minor changes are required to add basic support for the system-monitor
core.
The non backwards compatible changes are:
* Register map offset was moved from 0x200 to 0x400
* Only one ADC compared to two in the XADC
* 10 bit ADC instead of 12 bit ADC
* Two of the channels monitor different supplies
Add the necessary logic to accommodate these changes to support the
system-monitor in the XADC driver.
Note that this patch does not include support for some new features found
in the system-monitor like additional alarms, user supply monitoring and
secondary system-monitor access. This might be added at a later time.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Tested-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922134624.13191-2-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add binding documentation for the Xilinx System Management Wizard. The
Xilinx System Management Wizard is a AXI frontend for the Xilinx System
Monitor found in the UltraScale and UltraScale+ FPGAs.
The System Monitor is the equivalent to the Xilinx XADC found in their
previous generation of FPGAs and their external and internal interfaces are
very similar. For this reason the share the same binding documentation. But
since they are not 100% compatible and software will have to know about the
differences they use a different compatible string.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922134624.13191-1-lars@metafoo.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Smatch found a local variable that can get copied to another
local variable without an initializion in the error case:
drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:1056 vchiq_get_user_ptr() error: uninitialized symbol 'ptr'.
This seems harmless, as the function should normally get inlined, with
the output directly written or not. In any case, the uninitialized data
is never used after get_user() fails.
As Dan mentions, it could still trigger an UBSAN runtime error, and it
is of course a bad idea to copy uninitialized variables, so just
bail out early.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105135256.1810337-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The addition of the local 'userdata' pointer to
vchiq_irq_queue_bulk_tx_rx omitted the case where neither BLOCKING nor
WAITING modes are used, in which case the value provided by the
caller is not returned to them as expected, but instead it is replaced
with a NULL. This lack of a suitable context may cause the application
to crash or otherwise malfunction.
Fixes: 4184da4f31 ("staging: vchiq: fix __user annotations")
Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105162030.1415213-2-phil@raspberrypi.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There are certain conditional expressions in rtl8192e, where a boolean
variable is compared with true/false, in forms such as (foo == true) or
(false != bar), which does not comply with checkpatch.pl (CHECK:
BOOL_COMPARISON), according to which boolean variables should be
themselves used in the condition, rather than comparing with true/false
E.g. in drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c,
"if (Type == true)" can be replaced with: "if (Type)"
Replace all such expressions with the bool variables appropriately
Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201220194224.12835-1-yashsri421@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
