Fix power well control state by reading real register offset.
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Comment says for eaglelake/cantiga, but it's listed in the ilk table,
too. So apply it to both.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQgvdwAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiG+3AH/i2XsqqN3VctL0nnbWfvds+Q
aKulfIdJTjKiVAsawPUtRqReZ8ijiebrgA/53lZLlrFOoPPQ5+LHmnSyQF6gErOY
NuAE1lijXDRM1pwBlhvOBbAj26wUobGjqONFJ9OkKr758Ue8ds/Q7UdxyEgmYgmg
tvVMzfRcICzryUV3PcqL+3cNPpCUdT6wGGRJ9DCv/jvGiWKExWhOle5oltrmxk+D
NsqRcws5pEubfHE4J8BvNWr8lE1kHfYVhrJETiLJUiN2XAJcbI4Jy7rU/3EGteNS
0HMZdaPPjV874lohdM70X2225SbYrCVkAYB5hnZCTeC3tYyCawBBPMQoyAiOcmU=
=+861
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued
Linux 3.7-rc2
Backmerge to solve two ugly conflicts:
- uapi. We've already added new ioctl definitions for -next. Do I need to say more?
- wc support gtt ptes. We've had to revert this for snb+ for 3.7 and
also fix a few other things in the code. Now we know how to make it
work on snb+, but to avoid losing the other fixes do the backmerge
first before re-enabling wc gtt ptes on snb+.
And a few other minor things, among them git getting confused in
intel_dp.c and seemingly causing a conflict out of nothing ...
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c
include/drm/i915_drm.h
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We were programming register 0x42020 twice on those platforms. Once
should be enough.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With the consolidated registers, it appears that we're setting the same
bis several times. Let's just collect the bits we want to set and program
it once.
v2: More cleanup. Also program 0x42004 and 0x45000 for FBC on non
mobile platforms (Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Undo the functional change as discussed on irc.]
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Register 0x42020 was defined twice under the names PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D and
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE. This patch consolidate the 2 sets of defines in one.
The transforms done are:
PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D
DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPARB_CLK_GATE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFD_CLK_GATE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_CLK_FBC -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS1 -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS2 -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
We have a VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE define for the pre-ILK DSPCLK_GATE_D.
Even if the same bit is used in ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D, other bits in the
register change, so I went with re-defining it, well more precisely rename
IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE, which is not specific to IVB+. So:
IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE (ILK+ code)
This commit is only a renaming commit, further commits will clean up the
logic.
v2: Rename bit 5 and 7 to _ENABLE as setting them to 1 enables clock
gating on their respective units, contrary to all of the other bits
(Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Single-threaded forcewake was only used on some early pre-production
ivybridge machines, all the latest ones should use mt forcewake. And
we already assume this in other places of the code (e.g. DERRMR
support in the ddx, or the latest intel_gt_reset patch to reset any
lingering forcewake references left behind by the bios), so don't
bother here, too.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Some BIOSes may forcibly suspend RC6 during their operation which
trigger a warning as we find the hardware in a perplexing state upon
first use. So far that appears to be the worst symptom as fortuituously
we use the same values as the BIOS for programming the FORCEWAKE register.
Reported-by: Oleksij Rempel <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
No functional change, but reserves 0x2 for use by userspace.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
BIOS should be setting the minimum voltage for rc6 to be 450mV. Old or
buggy BIOSen may not be doing this, so we correct it for them. Ideally
customers should update the BIOS as only it would know the optimal
values for the platform, so we leave that fact as a DRM_ERROR for the
user to see.
Unfortunately this isn't fixing any of the issues it was targeted to
fix, but it is documented that we must do it.
CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
CC: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: bikeshedded loglevel of the "your bios is broken message" to
debug.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There is a special mechanism for communicating with the PCU already
being used for the ring frequency stuff. As we'll be needing this for
other commands, extract it now to make future code less error prone and
the current code more reusable.
I'm not entirely sure if this code matches 1:1 with the previous code
behaviorally. Functionally however, it should be the same.
CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: Fixup compile fail reported by Wu Fengguang.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
A previous patch, namely:
commit bf97b276ca
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Apr 11 20:42:41 2012 +0200
drm/i915: implement w/a for incorrect guarband clipping
accidentally set bit 5 in 3D_CHICKEN, which has nothing to do with
clipping. This patch changes it to be set in 3D_CHICKEN3, where it
belongs.
The game "Dante" demonstrates random clipping issues when guardband
clipping is enabled and bit 5 of 3D_CHICKEN3 isn't set. So the
workaround is actually necessary.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Oliver McFadden <oliver.mcfadden@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Introduced in commit 87f8020ec9:
drm/i915: implement WaDisableEarlyCull for VLV and IVB
Notice that the original patch sent to the mailing list did not
include the Haswell chunk, it was added later.
The bit set by the commit does not exist on Haswell machines (at least
that's what the documentation says). Also, the commit gives me a GPU
hang every time we're loading the driver. So let's revert the Haswell
chunk, making the patch do only what its title actually says.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This workaround is only valid for IVB and VLV and the write triggers an
error on HSW.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanonI@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
For the next person that checks these kind of things, without having to
dig up the register definition.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There's is another register (a read only, so no harm done) at 0x42020 on
Haswell GPUs. Let's just remove the write from the copy&paste that
introduced haswell_init_clock_gating().
A note for the interested reader, it does seem we have a duplication of
the 0x42020 register definition, hence the removal of 2 writes. That
duplication could be the object of a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Workaround for a culling optimization.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Also apply to haswell, spotted by Damien.]
Reviewed-by: "Lespiau, Damien" <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I can't even find how I figured this might be needed anymore. But sure
enough, the value I'm reading back on platforms doesn't match what the
docs recommends.
It seemed to fix Chris' GT1 in limited testing as well.
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Finishes commit 02d719562e
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Thu Aug 9 16:44:54 2012 +0200
drm/i915: properly guard ilk ips state
The core functions were annotated with their locking requirements, but
we overlooked that they were exported, without any control over the
locking, to debugfs. So in order to enable debugfs to read the registers
without triggering sanity checks, we change the exported entry points to
properly take the required locks before calling the core routines.
Reported-by: yangguang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQX7MuAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiG0h0IAJURkrMCAQUxA+Ik66ReH89s
LQcVd0U9uL4UUOi7f5WR64Vf9Cfu6VVGX9ZKSvjpNskvlQaUQPMIt4pMe6g4X4dI
u0bApEy4XZz3nGabUAghIU8jJ8cDmhCG6kPpSiS7pi7KHc0yIa4WFtJRrIpGaIWT
xuK38YOiOHcSDRlLyWZzainMncQp/ixJdxnqVMTonkVLk0q0b84XzOr4/qlLE5lU
i+TsK3PRKdQXgvZ4CebL+srPBwWX1dmgP3VkeBloQbSSenSeELICbFWavn2ml+sF
GXi4dO93oNquL/Oy5SwI666T4uNcrRPaS+5X+xSZgBW/y2aQVJVJuNZg6ZP/uWk=
=0v2l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.6-rc7' into drm-intel-next-queued
Manual backmerge of -rc7 to resolve a silent conflict leading to
compile failure in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c.
This is due to the bugfix in -rc7:
commit b98b601672
Author: Wang Xingchao <xingchao.wang@intel.com>
Date: Thu Sep 13 07:43:22 2012 +0800
drm/i915: HDMI - Clear Audio Enable bit for Hot Plug
Since this code moved around a lot in -next git put that snippet at
the wrong spot. I've tried to fix this by making the conflict explicit
by merging a version for next with:
commit 3cce574f01
Author: Wang Xingchao <xingchao.wang@intel.com>
Date: Thu Sep 13 11:19:00 2012 +0800
drm/i915: HDMI - Clear Audio Enable bit for Hot Plug unconditionally
But that failed to solve the entire problem. To avoid pushing out
further -nightly branch to our QA where this is broken, do the
backmerge and manually add the stuff git adds to -next from the patch
in -fixes.
Note that this doesn't show up in git's merge diff (and hence is also
not handled by git rerere), which adds to the reasons why I'd like to
fix this with a verbose backmerge. The git merge diff only shows a
bunch of trivial conflicts of the "code changed in lines next to each
another" kind.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With the new "standardized" sysfs interfaces we need to be a bit more
careful about setting the RPS values.
Because the sysfs code and the rps workqueue can run at the same time,
if the sysfs setter wins the race to the mutex, the workqueue can come
in and set a value which is out of range (ie. we're no longer protecting
by RPINTLIM).
I was not able to actually make this error occur in testing.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In order to keep our cached values in sync with the hardware, we need a
posting read here.
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Currently we've only frobbed this bit at irq_init time, but did
not restore it at resume time. Move it to the gen3 clock gating
function to fix this.
Notice while reading through code.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (for 3.5 only)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The same designer from the previous patch has told us to never read
FORCEWAKE. We only do this for the POSTING_READ(), so simply change that
to something within the same cacheline (for no reason in particular
other than it sounds nice). In the _mt case we can leverage
the gtfifodbg check for the POSTING_READ.
This partially reverts
commit 6af2d180f8
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Thu Jul 26 16:24:50 2012 +0200
drm/i915: fix forcewake related hangs on snb
v2: commit message, comments about posting read from (Daniel)
Note: vlv forcewake doesn't need any changes for this special
treatment since FORCEWAKE_VLV is in a totally different register
range, and the readback FORCEWAKE_ACK_VLV readback that follows is in
the same range.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Added note.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
A designer familiar with the hardware has stated that the forcewake
timeout can theoretically be as high as a little over 1ms. Therefore we
modify our code to use 2ms (appropriate fudge and because we don't want
to round down).
Hopefully this can't prevent spurious timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
[danvet: again fix conflict with vlv patch.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It's used all over the place, and we want to be able to play around with
the value, apparently. Note that it doesn't touch other timeouts of the
same value (like gtfifo, and thread C0 wait).
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
[danvet: fixup conflict with vlv forcewake patches.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
<ickle> danvet: in the force wake, both DRM_ERRORs have the same string.
<ickle> useful for .txt shrinkage, horrible for debugging
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
For some odd reasons, the vlv forcewake code is rather different from
all other platforms, with no clear justification. Adjust things:
- Don't check whether the gt is awake already (and bail out early), we
need to grab a forcewake anyway. Otherwise the chip might go to
sleep too early. And this would also screw up our forcewake
accounting.
- Like all other platforms, check whether the gt has cleared the
forcewake bit in the _ACK register before setting it again.
- Use _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE/DISABLE macros
- Only use bit0 of the forcewake reg, not all 16 bits.
- check the gtfifodb reg like on all other platforms in _put.
- Drop the POSTING_READs for consistency.
v2: Failure to git add ... again.
v3: Fixup the spelling fail a bit.
Tested-by: "Purushothaman, Vijay A" <vijay.a.purushothaman@intel.com>
Tested-by: "Widawsky, Benjamin" <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We've had and still have too many issues where the gpu turbo doesn't
quite to what it's supposed to do (or what we want it to do).
Adding a tracepoint to track when the desired gpu frequency changes
should help a lot in characterizing and understanding problematic
workloads.
Also, this should be fairly interesting for power tuning (and
especially noticing when the gpu is stuck in high frequencies, as has
happened in the past) and hence for integration into powertop and
similar tools.
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Like with the equivalent change for gen6+ rps state, this helps in
clarifying the code (and in fixing a few places that have fallen through
the cracks in the locking review).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel writes:
"New stuff for -next. Highlights:
- prep patches for the modeset rework. Note that one of those patches
touches the fb helper in the common drm code.
- hasw hdmi audio support (Wang Xingchao)
- improved instdone dumping for gen7 (Ben)
- unbound tracking and a few follow-up patches from Chris
- dma_buf->begin/end_cpu_access plus fix for drm/udl (Dave)
- improve mmio error reporting for hsw
- prep patch for WQ_NON_REENTRANT removal (Tejun Heo)
"
* 'for-airlied' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel: (41 commits)
drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD
drm/i915: disable rc6 on ilk when vt-d is enabled
drm/i915: Avoid unbinding due to an interrupted pin_and_fence during execbuffer
drm/i915: Use new INSTDONE registers (Gen7+)
drm/i915: Add new INSTDONE registers
drm/i915: Extract reading INSTDONE
drm/i915: Use a non-blocking wait for set-to-domain ioctl
drm/i915: Juggle code order to ease flow of the next patch
drm/i915: Use cpu relocations if the object is in the GTT but not mappable
drm/i915: Extract general object init routine
drm/i915: Protect private gem objects from truncate (such as imported dmabuf)
drm/i915: Only pwrite through the GTT if there is space in the aperture
i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1
drm/i915: Find unclaimed MMIO writes.
drm/i915: Add ERR_INT to gen7 error state
drm/i915: Cantiga+ cannot handle a hsync front porch of 0
drm/i915: fix reassignment of variable "intel_dp->DP"
drm/i915: Try harder to allocate an mmap_offset
drm/i915: Show pin count in debugfs
drm/i915: Show (count, size) of purgeable objects in i915_gem_objects
...
There was some merge conflicts in -next and they weren't so pretty, so
backmerge now to avoid them.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c
It blows up. And hopefully this is the root-cause of the mysterious
rc6 related hang on ilk. For reference, the commit that enabled rc6 on
ilk again is:
commit 456470eb58
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Aug 8 23:35:40 2012 +0200
drm/i915: enable rc6 on ilk again
Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Avoid stalling and waiting for the GPU by checking to see if there is
sufficient inactive space in the aperture for us to bind the buffer
prior to writing through the GTT. If there is inadequate space we will
have to stall waiting for the GPU, and incur overheads moving objects
about. Instead, only incur the clflush overhead on the target object by
writing through shmem.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
James Bottomley reported [1] a massive power regression, due to the
enabling of semaphores by default in 3.5. A workaround for him is to
again disable semaphores. And indeed, his system has a very hard time
to enter rc6 with semaphores enabled.
Ben Widawsky run around with a kill-a-watt a lot and noticed:
- There are indeed a few rare systems that seem to have a hard time
entering rc6 when desktop-idle.
- One machine, The Indestructible Toshiba regressed in this behaviour
between 3.5 and 3.6 in a merge commit! So rc6 behaviour with the
current setting seems to be highly timing dependent and not robust
at all.
- The behaviour James reported wrt semaphores seems to be a freak
timing thing that only happens on his specific machine, confirming
that enabling semaphores shouldn't reduce rc6 residency.
Now furthermore the Google ChromeOS guys reported [2] a while ago that
at least on some machines a simply a blinking cursor can keep the gpu
turbo at the highest frequency. This is because the current rps limits
used on snb/ivb are highly asymmetric.
On the theory that gpu turbo and rc6 tuning values are related, we've
tried whether the much saner looking (since much less asymmetric) rps
tuning values used for hsw would also help entering rc6 more robustly.
And it seems to mostly work, and we don't really have the resources to
through-roughly tune things in any better way: The values from the
ChromeOS ppl seem to fare a bit worse for James' machine, so I guess
we better stick with something vpg (the gpu hw/windows group)
provided, hoping that they've done their jobs.
Reference[1]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/025675.html
Reference[2]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-July/018692.html
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53393
Tested-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQLWtvAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiG/DYH+wd0FqfEuYkYk4KPyAPuhKpX
zX7HYfLvyJE/ZYIdrhjq1E6Xm2KNr7gtX7/Rdzi2W38M9sjbYzwG1UGIw51qnxWy
yZJH9BGkfyQgQPeuDGohfB6DkDy2JWr2eqMDvakjOwgBsIzji0PQD/f3UvndhtUa
c+tTj/kjavHE1Yr2Wy6OnRZz3Uc0hIMn/Q0JqtbCs3LUgEV1KA4OEAe56XNz4Ku4
WE+FFaGFPvtriQsQON+ohPS5IC8jzQGK/0vbrJ4lWjFnZy4gvZXnborTOwD0WSQG
fbsNuxp1AaM2/pqfMwXm1w0ADvwOITHNiwwXf9id6DoK81QwTFpUdvKpn6yB6gQ=
=rurr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.6-rc2' into drm-intel-next
Backmerge Linux 3.6-rc2 to resolve a few funny conflicts before we put
even more madness on top:
- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: Just a spurious WARN removed in
-fixes, that has been changed in a variable-rename in -next, too.
- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c: -next remove scratch_addr
(since all their users have been extracted in another fucntion),
-fixes added another user for a hw workaroudn.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I have the faint hope that the total absence of any locking for the
rps code wasn't too good an idea and could very well have caused some
rc6 related regressions.
Unfortunately we've never managed to reproduce these issues on any of
our own machines, so the only way to go about this is to enable it and
see what happens.
While at it, kill some stale comments and improve the logging.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We change the drps/ips sw/hw state from different callers: Our own irq
handler, the external intel-ips module and from process context. Most
of these callers don't take any lock at all.
Protect everything by making the mchdev_lock irqsave and grabbing it in
all relevant callsites. Note that we have to convert a few sleeps in the
drps enable/disable code to delays, but alas, I'm not volunteering to
restructure the code around a few work items.
For paranoia add a spin_locked assert to ironlake_set_drps, too.
v2: Move one access inside the lock protection. Caught by the
dev_priv->ips mass-rename ...
v3: Resolve rebase conflict.
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It's only ever a pointer to the global mchdev_lock, and we don't use
it at all.
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This way it's easier so see what belongs together, and what is used
by the ilk ips code. Also add some comments that explain the locking.
Note that (cur|min|max)_delay need to be duplicated, because
they're also used by the ips code.
v2: Missed one place that the dev_priv->ips change caught ...
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
- Take the dev->struct_mutex around access the corresponding state
(and adjusting the rps hw state).
- Add an assert to gen6_set_rps to ensure we don't forget about this
in the future.
- Don't set up the min/max_freq files if it doesn't apply to the hw.
And do the same for the gen6+ cache sharing file while at it.
v2: Move the gen6+ checks into the read/write callbacks. Thanks to the
awesome drm midlayer we can't check that when registering the debugfs
files, because the driver is not yet fully set up, specifically the
->load callback hasn't run yet.
Oh how I despise this disaster ...
v3: Also add a WARN_ON(mutex_is_locked) in set_rps to check the
locking.
v4: Use mutex_lock_interruptible, suggested by Chris Wilson.
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (for v2)
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The update_gfx_val function called from mark_busy wasn't taking the
mchdev_lock, as it should have. Also sprinkle a few spinlock asserts
over the code to document things better.
Things are still rather confusing, especially since a few variables
in dev_priv are used by both the gen6+ rps code and the ilk ips code.
But protected by totally different locks. Follow-on patches will clean
that up.
v2: Don't add a deadlock ... hence split up update_gfx_val into a
wrapper that grabs the lock and an internal __ variant for callsites
within intel_pm.c that already have taken the lock.
v3: Mark the internal helper as static, noticed by Ben Widawsky.
v4: Damien Lespiau had questions about the safety of the ips setup
sequence, explain in a comment why it works.
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In commit
commit 20b46e59dd
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Thu Jul 26 11:16:14 2012 +0200
drm/i915: Only set the down rps limit when at the loweset frequency
The computation for the new desired frequency was extracted, but since
the desired frequency was passed-by value, the adjustments didn't
propgate back. Fix this.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
... by adding seemingly redudant posting reads.
This little dragon lair exploded the first time around when we've
refactored the code a bit to use the common wait_for_atomic_us in
"drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable",
which caused QA to file fdo bug #51738.
Chris Wilson entertained a few approaches to fixing #51738: Replacing
the udelay(1) with the previously-used udelay(10) (or any other
"sufficiently larger" delay), adding a posting read, or ditching the
delay completely and using cpu_relax. We went with the cpu_relax and
"915: Workaround hang with BSD and forcewake on SandyBridge". Which
blew up in fdo bug #52424, but adding the posting read while still
using cpu_relax seems to also fix that, it looks like the
posting read is the important ingriedient to fix these rc6 related
hangs on snb.
Popular theories as to why this is like it is include:
- A herd of pink elephants got royally angered somehow.
- The gpu has internally different functional units and judging by the
register offsets, the forcewake request register and the forcewake
ack registers are _not_ in the same functional unit (or at least
aren't reached through the same routes). Hence the posting read
syncs up with the wrong block and gets the entire gpu confused.
- ...
As a minimal ducttape fix for 3.6, let's just put these posting reads
into place again. We can try fancier approaches (like adding back the
cpu_relax instead of the udelay) in -next.
This (re-)fixes a regression introduced in
commit 990bbdadab
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jul 2 11:51:02 2012 -0300
drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Du Yan <yanx.du@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51738u
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We believe to have squashed all issues around the gen6+ rps interrupt
generation and why the gpu sometimes got stuck. With that cleared up,
there's no user left for the sanitize_pm infrastructure, so let's just
rip it out.
Note that 'intel_reg_write 0xa014 0x13070000' is the w/a if we find
ourselves stuck again.
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The power docs say that when the gt leaves rc6, it is in the lowest
frequency and only about 25 usec later will switch to the frequency
selected in GEN6_RPNSWREQ. If the downclock limit expires in that
window and the down limit is set to the lowest possible frequency, the
hw will not send the down interrupt. Which leads to a too high gpu
clock and wasted power.
Chris Wilson already worked on this with
commit 7b9e0ae6da
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Sat Apr 28 08:56:39 2012 +0100
drm/i915: Always update RPS interrupts thresholds along with
frequency
but got the logic inverted: The current code set the down limit as
long as we haven't reached it. Instead of only once with reached the
lowest frequency.
Note that we can't always set the downclock limit to 0, because
otherwise the hw will keep on bugging us with downclock request irqs
once the lowest level is reached.
For similar reasons also always set the upclock limit, otherwise the
hw might poke us again with interrupts.
v2: Chris Wilson noticed that the limit reg is also computed in
sanitize_pm. To avoid duplication, extract the code into a common
function.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
As suggested by Daniel, rip out the independent timers for device and
crtc busyness and integrate the manual powermanagement of the display
engine into the GEM core and its request tracking. The benefits are that
the code is a lot smaller, fewer moving parts and should fit more neatly
into the overall activity tracking of the driver.
v2: Complete overhaul and removal of the racy timers and workers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This initializes power wells within the modeset_init_hw routine.
Testing has shown that this works for both driver load time and for
suspend-resume code paths.
Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There is little point waking up every 10ms to service an interrupt which
we then promptly ignore. So only program the the PMIER to enable
interrupts for those events which we do handle, not all of them!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
