Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
that intersect with pipe damaged area will not
have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
called, causing panel to not be properly updated.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not supported on DG2.
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Implements changes around PSR for alderlake-P:
- EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE was removed and bit 30 now has other function
- Some bits of PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL moved and SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE was
removed setting SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR will do this job
- SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR have now line granularity but will need to
be aligned with DSC when the PSRS + DSC support lands
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Most of the places are using this format so lets consolidate it.
v2:
- split patch in two: display and non-display because of conflicts
between drm-intel-gt-next x drm-intel-next
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713003854.143197-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not compatible with DC3CO or VRR in this stepping, so not
enabling PSR2 if VRR will be enabled or not enabling DC3CO if PSR2 is
possible.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-5-jose.souza@intel.com
In some modes there is not enough time during hblank to transmit PSR2
SDP plus the pixels CRC SDP, if such case happens PSR2 needs to be
disabled.
But eDP spec 1.4b allows to transmit PSR2 SDP in a prior scanline
alone and than later the CRC SDP, allowing PSR2 to be enabled in
those hblank constrained modes.
BSpec: 49274
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-4-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR2_CTL io buffer wake and fast wake values do not match
expected in pre production hardware, so here adding a table that
matches with HW to program it with values that HW expect.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-2-jose.souza@intel.com
We were only handling X and width granularity, what was causing issues
when sink had a granularity different than 4.
While at it, renaming su_x_granularity to su_w_granularity to better
match reality.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.
- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
- Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
- Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
- Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
- If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
- In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
It removes intel_crtc_state from function argument of
intel_psr_enable_source() in order to use intel_psr_enable_source()
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal functions.
And we can get cpu_trancoder from intel_psr, therefore we don't need to
pass intel_crtc_state to this function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210526000656.3060314-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We are missing the implementation of some workarounds to enabled PSR2
in Alderlake P, so to avoid any CI report of issues around PSR2
disabling it until all PSR2 workarounds are implemented.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-5-jose.souza@intel.com
DC3CO is allowed in all the combinations between pipe and port A and B
on alderlake-P.
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-4-jose.souza@intel.com
In order to reuse code of PSR interrupt error check on other PSR functions,
it adds psr_interrupt_error_check() function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
It replaces dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct. And
it saves dc3co_exitline, not dc3co_enabled, so we can use dc3co_exitline
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal function like as
intel_psr_enable_source().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-12-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was
programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed.
So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout,
EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state
flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The implementation of two workarounds are missing causing failures
in CI with pre-production HW.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210505213801.80772-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
TGL PSR2 hardware tracking shows momentary flicker and screen shift if
TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0.
It has been fixed from TGL Display stepping C0.
HSDES: 18015970021
HSDES: 2209313811
BSpec: 55378
v2: Add checking of PSR2 manual tracking (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210422160544.2427123-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE became a reserved register in display 13.
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID have the same fate as EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE
but as we don't need it, removing the macro definition of it.
BSpec: 50422
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421220224.200729-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Gen to ver conversions across the driver
The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville's GLK fixes [2] and a
cherry-pick of Matt's commit [3] from drm-intel-next as a base to avoid
conflicts.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88938/
[3] 70bfb30743 ("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/878s5ebny0.fsf@intel.com
Fix redundant condition, caught in cppcheck by kernel test robot.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Fixes: b64d6c5138 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210409231738.238682-1-jose.souza@intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 71c1a49983.
The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and
get back some power savings.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408204917.254272-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as
those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet
in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
HSDES: 14011750631
HSDES: 14011741325
BSpec: 53273
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408214205.327704-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Even though GEN12+ HW supports PSR + DC3CO, DMC's HW DC3CO exit mechanism
has an issue with using of Selective Fecth and PSR2 manual tracking.
And as some GEN12+ platforms (RKL, ADL-S) don't support PSR2 HW tracking,
Selective Fetch will be enabled by default on that platforms.
Therefore if the system enables PSR Selective Fetch / PSR manual tracking,
it does not allow DC3CO dc state, in that case.
When this DC3CO exit issue is addressed while PSR Selective Fetch is
enabled, this restriction should be removed.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Fix typo
- Move check routine of DC3CO ability to
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config()
v3: Change the check routine of enablement of psr2 sel fetch. (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222213006.1609085-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This will set the right value of source_support when the port
encoder/port supports PSR but sink don't.
This change will also be needed in future for panel replay as psr
struct needs to be initialized even if disconnected or current sink
don't support PSR.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-4-jose.souza@intel.com
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check
it again at every CAN_PSR().
Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set
the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had
that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder.
Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is
set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just
ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have
with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch().
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now CI is blacklisting module reload, so we need to be able to
enable PSR2 selective fetch in run time to test this feature before
enable it by default.
Changes in IGT will also be needed.
v2:
- Fixed handling of I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH in
intel_psr_debug_set()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209205036.351076-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher.
Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file,
there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions
later.
v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions,
add header file.
v3: move scaler bits back
v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville)
v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes
v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
While JSL and EHL eDP transcoder supports PSR2, the phy of this
platforms only supports eDP 1.3, so removing PSR2 support as this
feature was added in eDP 1.4.
Signed-off-by: Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204175830.97857-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Even though our HW supports PSR + VRR, the available panels
do not work reliably with PSR and VRR together. So if user
requested VRR and is supported by HW enable that and do not
enable PSR in that case.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-7-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a
surprisingly clean cut.
v2:
- Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman)
- Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
TGL adds another level of indirection for applying WA based on stepping
information rather than PCI REVID. So change TGL_REVID enum into
stepping enum and use PCI REVID as index into revid to stepping table to
fetch correct display and GT stepping for application of WAs as
suggested by Matt Roper.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 0883ce8146. Originally
these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP
backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible
to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist
for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces
over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the
normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually
filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs.
At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with
DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a
second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work
with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for
HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to
light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which
means we finally have a real solution to this problem.
As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and
furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk
checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only
driver using this.
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in
intel_edp_init_connector()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
It programs Plane's calculated x, y, offset to Plane SF register.
It does the calculation of x and y offsets using
skl_calc_main_surface_offset().
v3: Update commit message
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area.
Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software
needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips.
Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another
loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe
damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending
of all planes can happen.
v2:
- do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
v4:
- setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area
- mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha
changed
v5:
- taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates
- adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are
invisible in the new state
v6:
- consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it
moved to calculate damaged area
- remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip
v7:
- intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area
v8:
- adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping
- adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the
framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from
v9:
- Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible
- Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and
new state
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Add the calculations to set plane selective fetch registers depending
in the value of the area damaged.
It is still using the whole plane area as damaged but that will change
in next patches.
v2:
- fixed new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2 typo in
intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
- do not shifthing new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130125750.17820-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state
after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added
initial_fastset_check() hook.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual
glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive
workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached.
Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without
glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost
of less time with PSR active.
So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better
fix is found.
The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if
there is not other frontbuffer modifications.
Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse
the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround
as soon as a better solution is found.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration
validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW
tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from
Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on
Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12
and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros.
v2: Fix macro definitions. (José)
v3: Addressed review comments from José
- Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+
- Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input.
- Update Todo comments.
v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some
issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be
a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is
due VBT values.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
RKL doesn't have PSR2 HW tracking, it was replaced by software/manual
tracking. The driver is required to track the areas that needs update
and program hardware to send selective updates.
So until the software tracking is implemented, PSR2 needs to be disabled
for platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200603211529.3005059-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.
So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211183358.157448-2-lyude@redhat.com
Commit 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase
once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is
all initialized.
Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and
it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or
intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
allow PSR to be enabled.
v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv
v4:
- renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to
intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from
intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks
that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does
- moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to
i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the
functions calls happening between the old and the new function call
will cause issue
Fixes: 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Add a basic description about how DC3CO works to help people not
familiar with it.
While at it, I also improved the delayed work handle and function
names and removed a debug message that is ambiguous and not much
useful, no changes in behavior here.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205214945.131012-1-jose.souza@intel.com
A recent change in BSpec allow us to change EXTLINE while transcoder
is enabled so this allow us to change it even when doing the first
fastset after taking over previous hardware state set by BIOS.
BIOS don't enable PSR, so if sink supports PSR it will be enabled on
the first fastset, so moving the EXTLINE compute and set to PSR flows
allow us to simplfy a bunch of code.
This will save a lot of time in all the IGT tests that uses CRC, as
when PSR2 is enabled CRCs are not generated, so we switch to PSR1, so
the previous code would compute dc3co_exitline=0 causing a full
modeset that would shutdown pipe, enable and train link.
v2: only programming EXTLINE when DC3CO is enabled
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This will calculaet the DC3CO exit delay only once per full modeset.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Both activate functions and the dc3co disable function were doing the
same thing, so better move to a function and share.
Also while at it adding a WARN_ON to catch invalid values.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200113214603.52158-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be
enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial
commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset()
is always false.
To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is
driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not
require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot
process plus the power savings that PSR brings.
It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at
this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when
computing encoder state.
v2:
- removed function return
- change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check
v3:
- replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253
Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP specification states that sink can have its PSR capability
changed, I have never found any panel doing that but lets add that
for completeness.
For now it is not reading back the PSR capabilities and if possible
re-enabling PSR, this will be added if a panel is found using this
feature.
v4:
Cleaning DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-4-jose.souza@intel.com
When this error happens sink link is not stable after the required
FW_EXIT_LATENCY period so it will miss the selective update.
As the other PSR errors, for now we are not trying to recover from
it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-3-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
v2:
returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 HW only support a limited number of bits per pixel, if mode has
more than supported PSR2 should not be enabled.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch,
ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
@@
-T->base
+T->uapi
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-T->base.x
+T->hw.x
@@
struct drm_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x
+to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
We are still looking at drm_crtc_state in a few places, convert those
to use intel_crtc_state instead.
Changes since v1:
- Move to before uapi/hw split.
- Add hunks for intel_pm.c as well.
Changes since v2:
- Incorporate Ville's feedback.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
'Link CRC error' will now have same error level as
other PSR2 errors like 'RFB storage error' and
'VSC SDP uncorrectable error'.
Signed-off-by: Ap Kamal <kamal.ap@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1571819128-3264-1-git-send-email-kamal.ap@intel.com
Reduce verbosity in code by renaming dsc_params member of crtc state to
simply dsc. There is enough context for this to be clear. No functional
changes.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022133414.8293-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame
while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel
is the classic example of this use case.
B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback.
It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip
and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't
differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip.
We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO
state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily
targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer
invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will
explicitly disable DC3CO.
DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video
playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet
most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames.
As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for
deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames
(By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been
enabled after a pageflip).
After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and
PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this
point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after
6 idle frames.
In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the
PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the
DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get
complete.
v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an
update. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race
with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre]
v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work.
hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before
putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping
a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)]
v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre]
v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre]
Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a
delayed work. [Imre]
Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep
sleep. [Imre]
Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre]
v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask
checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the
psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre]
v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre]
Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of
busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre]
Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
For older gens PSR IIR and IMR have fixed addresses. From TGL onwards those
registers moved to each transcoder offset. The bits for the registers
are defined without an offset per transcoder as right now we have one
register per transcoder. So add a fake "trans_shift" when calculating
the bits offsets: it will be 0 for gen12+ and psr.transcoder otherwise.
v2 (Lucas): change the implementation to use trans_shift instead of
getting each bit value with a different macro
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-3-jose.souza@intel.com
It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder
while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders
masked.
While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are
reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12
onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing
them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are
not needed.
v2 (Lucas):
- Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders
- Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances:
when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the
singleton psr that it needs to be extended
- Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with
psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug
register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just
record the value to be set when enabling the source.
- Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it
(from Imre)
- handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling
the other flags
v3:
- Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
According to BSpc if link standby is set on TGL+, PSR will not be
enabled. Vendors should not use panels that requires link standby and
even if they do, panel should assert a PSR error that will cause PSR to
be disabled.
BSpec: 50434
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
TGL PSR2 HW supports a bigger resolution, so lets add it
BSpec: 50422, 49199
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
On TGL+ it's possible to have PSR1 enabled in other ports besides DDIA.
PSR2 is still limited to DDIA. However currently we handle only one
instance of PSR struct. Lets guard intel_psr_init_dpcd() against
multiple eDP panels and warn about it.
v2: Reword commit message to be TGL+ only and with the info where
PSR1/PSR2 are supported (Lucas)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().
v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
