forked from Minki/linux
Revert "i40e: Fix reset bw limit when DCB enabled with 1 TC"
Revert of a patch that instead of fixing a AQ error when trying to reset BW limit introduced several regressions related to creation and managing TC. Currently there are errors when creating a TC on both PF and VF. Error log: [17428.783095] i40e 0000:3b:00.1: AQ command Config VSI BW allocation per TC failed = 14 [17428.783107] i40e 0000:3b:00.1: Failed configuring TC map 0 for VSI 391 [17428.783254] i40e 0000:3b:00.1: AQ command Config VSI BW allocation per TC failed = 14 [17428.783259] i40e 0000:3b:00.1: Unable to configure TC map 0 for VSI 391 This reverts commit3d2504663c
. Fixes:3d2504663c
(i40e: Fix reset bw limit when DCB enabled with 1 TC) Signed-off-by: Mateusz Palczewski <mateusz.palczewski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220223175347.1690692-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9b5ae5c1b
commit
fe20371578
@ -5372,15 +5372,7 @@ static int i40e_vsi_configure_bw_alloc(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u8 enabled_tc,
|
||||
/* There is no need to reset BW when mqprio mode is on. */
|
||||
if (pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_TC_MQPRIO)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.hw) {
|
||||
if (pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED)
|
||||
goto skip_reset;
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I40E_DCB) &&
|
||||
i40e_dcb_hw_get_num_tc(&pf->hw) == 1)
|
||||
goto skip_reset;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.hw && !(pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED)) {
|
||||
ret = i40e_set_bw_limit(vsi, vsi->seid, 0);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
|
||||
@ -5388,8 +5380,6 @@ static int i40e_vsi_configure_bw_alloc(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u8 enabled_tc,
|
||||
vsi->seid);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
skip_reset:
|
||||
memset(&bw_data, 0, sizeof(bw_data));
|
||||
bw_data.tc_valid_bits = enabled_tc;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < I40E_MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS; i++)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user