forked from Minki/linux
drm/msm: Don't break exclusive fence ordering
There's only one exclusive slot, and we must not break the ordering. Adding a new exclusive fence drops all previous fences from the dma_resv. To avoid violating the signalling order we err on the side of over-synchronizing by waiting for the existing fences, even if userspace asked us to ignore them. A better fix would be to us a dma_fence_chain or _array like e.g. amdgpu now uses, but - msm has a synchronous dma_fence_wait for anything from another context, so doesn't seem to care much, - and it probably makes sense to lift this into dma-resv.c code as a proper concept, so that drivers don't have to hack up their own solution each on their own. v2: Improve commit message per Lucas' suggestion. Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210805104705.862416-17-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This commit is contained in:
parent
80bcfbd376
commit
f1b3f696a0
@ -330,7 +330,8 @@ static int submit_fence_sync(struct msm_gem_submit *submit, bool no_implicit)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (no_implicit)
|
||||
/* exclusive fences must be ordered */
|
||||
if (no_implicit && !write)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(&submit->base,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user