forked from Minki/linux
scsi: lpfc: avoid harmless comparison warning
When building with -Wextra, we get a lot of warnings for the lpfc driver concerning expressions that are always true, starting with: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c: In function 'lpfc_enable_npiv_init': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:2786:77: error: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Werror=type-limits] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c: In function 'lpfc_enable_rrq_init': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:2802:76: error: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Werror=type-limits] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c: In function 'lpfc_suppress_link_up_init': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:2812:2050: error: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Werror=type-limits] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c: In function 'lpfc_log_verbose_init': drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c:3064:1930: error: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Werror=type-limits] The code works as intended, but it would be nice to shut up the warning so we don't clutter up build logs with this. Using a separate inline function for it makes it clear to the compiler that the comparison is necessary in the caller but still lets it do the constant-folding. [mkp: fix typo] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a6cf881df
commit
de8c36bba3
@ -1621,6 +1621,11 @@ lpfc_sriov_hw_max_virtfn_show(struct device *dev,
|
||||
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", max_nr_virtfn);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool lpfc_rangecheck(uint val, uint min, uint max)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return val >= min && val <= max;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* lpfc_param_show - Return a cfg attribute value in decimal
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -1698,7 +1703,7 @@ lpfc_##attr##_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, \
|
||||
static int \
|
||||
lpfc_##attr##_init(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint val) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
if (val >= minval && val <= maxval) {\
|
||||
if (lpfc_rangecheck(val, minval, maxval)) {\
|
||||
phba->cfg_##attr = val;\
|
||||
return 0;\
|
||||
}\
|
||||
@ -1733,7 +1738,7 @@ lpfc_##attr##_init(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint val) \
|
||||
static int \
|
||||
lpfc_##attr##_set(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint val) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
if (val >= minval && val <= maxval) {\
|
||||
if (lpfc_rangecheck(val, minval, maxval)) {\
|
||||
lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT, \
|
||||
"3052 lpfc_" #attr " changed from %d to %d\n", \
|
||||
phba->cfg_##attr, val); \
|
||||
@ -1857,7 +1862,7 @@ lpfc_##attr##_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, \
|
||||
static int \
|
||||
lpfc_##attr##_init(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint val) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
if (val >= minval && val <= maxval) {\
|
||||
if (lpfc_rangecheck(val, minval, maxval)) {\
|
||||
vport->cfg_##attr = val;\
|
||||
return 0;\
|
||||
}\
|
||||
@ -1889,7 +1894,7 @@ lpfc_##attr##_init(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint val) \
|
||||
static int \
|
||||
lpfc_##attr##_set(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint val) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
if (val >= minval && val <= maxval) {\
|
||||
if (lpfc_rangecheck(val, minval, maxval)) {\
|
||||
lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT, \
|
||||
"3053 lpfc_" #attr \
|
||||
" changed from %d (x%x) to %d (x%x)\n", \
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user