forked from Minki/linux
sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention in dl_add_task_root_domain()
dl_add_task_root_domain() is called during sched domain rebuild: rebuild_sched_domains_locked() partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains() rebuild_root_domains() for all top_cpuset descendants: update_tasks_root_domain() for all tasks of cpuset: dl_add_task_root_domain() Change it so that only the task pi lock is taken to check if the task has a SCHED_DEADLINE (DL) policy. In case that p is a DL task take the rq lock as well to be able to safely de-reference root domain's DL bandwidth structure. Most of the tasks will have another policy (namely SCHED_NORMAL) and can now bail without taking the rq lock. One thing to note here: Even in case that there aren't any DL user tasks, a slow frequency switching system with cpufreq gov schedutil has a DL task (sugov) per frequency domain running which participates in DL bandwidth management. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210119083542.19856-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0d6d47896
commit
de40f33e78
@ -2388,9 +2388,13 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
struct rq *rq;
|
||||
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
|
||||
|
||||
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
|
||||
if (!dl_task(p))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
|
||||
if (!dl_task(p)) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
|
||||
|
||||
dl_b = &rq->rd->dl_bw;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
|
||||
@ -2399,7 +2403,6 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user