forked from Minki/linux
[NET]: Drop tx lock in dev_watchdog_up
Fix lockdep warning with GRE, iptables and Speedtouch ADSL, PPP over ATM. On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:39:28PM +0000, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > ======================================================= > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > ------------------------------------------------------- > swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: > (&dev->queue_lock){-+..}, at: [<c02c8c46>] dev_queue_xmit+0x56/0x290 > > but task is already holding lock: > (&dev->_xmit_lock){-+..}, at: [<c02c8e14>] dev_queue_xmit+0x224/0x290 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. This turns out to be a genuine bug. The queue lock and xmit lock are intentionally taken out of order. Two things are supposed to prevent dead-locks from occuring: 1) When we hold the queue_lock we're supposed to only do try_lock on the tx_lock. 2) We always drop the queue_lock after taking the tx_lock and before doing anything else. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #1 (&dev->_xmit_lock){-+..}: > [<c012e7b6>] lock_acquire+0x76/0xa0 > [<c0336241>] _spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 > [<c02d25a9>] dev_activate+0x69/0x120 This path obviously breaks assumption 1) and therefore can lead to ABBA dead-locks. I've looked at the history and there seems to be no reason for the lock to be held at all in dev_watchdog_up. The lock appeared in day one and even there it was unnecessary. In fact, people added __dev_watchdog_up precisely in order to get around the tx lock there. The function dev_watchdog_up is already serialised by rtnl_lock since its only caller dev_activate is always called under it. So here is a simple patch to remove the tx lock from dev_watchdog_up. In 2.6.19 we can eliminate the unnecessary __dev_watchdog_up and replace it with dev_watchdog_up. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cbe21d8fef
commit
d7811e623d
@ -238,9 +238,7 @@ void __netdev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
|
||||
static void dev_watchdog_up(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
|
||||
__netdev_watchdog_up(dev);
|
||||
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void dev_watchdog_down(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user