drm/i915/gt: Ignore dt==0 for reporting underflows
The presumption was that some time would always elapse between recording the start and the finish of a context switch. This turns out to be a regular occurrence and emitting a debug statement superfluous. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201117113103.21480-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ static void reset_active(struct i915_request *rq,
|
||||
static void st_update_runtime_underflow(struct intel_context *ce, s32 dt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
|
||||
ce->runtime.num_underflow += dt < 0;
|
||||
ce->runtime.num_underflow++;
|
||||
ce->runtime.max_underflow = max_t(u32, ce->runtime.max_underflow, -dt);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static void intel_context_update_runtime(struct intel_context *ce)
|
||||
ce->runtime.last = intel_context_get_runtime(ce);
|
||||
dt = ce->runtime.last - old;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(dt <= 0)) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(dt < 0)) {
|
||||
CE_TRACE(ce, "runtime underflow: last=%u, new=%u, delta=%d\n",
|
||||
old, ce->runtime.last, dt);
|
||||
st_update_runtime_underflow(ce, dt);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user