forked from Minki/linux
mac80211: use synchronize_rcu() with rcu_barrier()
The RCU docs used to state that rcu_barrier() included a wait for an RCU grace period; however the comments for rcu_barrier() as of commit f0a0e6f... "rcu: Clarify memory-ordering properties of grace-period primitives" contradict this. So add back synchronize_{rcu,net}() to where they once were, but keep the rcu_barrier()s for the call_rcu() callbacks. Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <bob@cozybit.com> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
908f8d07e9
commit
8ceb59557b
@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ static int ieee80211_stop_ap(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list)
|
||||
sta_info_flush_defer(vlan);
|
||||
sta_info_flush_defer(sdata);
|
||||
synchronize_net();
|
||||
rcu_barrier();
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list) {
|
||||
sta_info_flush_cleanup(vlan);
|
||||
|
@ -839,11 +839,12 @@ static void ieee80211_do_stop(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
|
||||
*
|
||||
* sta_info_flush_cleanup() requires rcu_barrier()
|
||||
* first to wait for the station call_rcu() calls
|
||||
* to complete, here we need at least sychronize_rcu()
|
||||
* it to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
|
||||
* to complete, and we also need synchronize_rcu()
|
||||
* to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
|
||||
* interface and enqueuing frames at this very time on
|
||||
* another CPU.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
rcu_barrier();
|
||||
sta_info_flush_cleanup(sdata);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct cfg80211_wowlan *wowlan)
|
||||
IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_SUSPEND);
|
||||
|
||||
/* flush out all packets and station cleanup call_rcu()s */
|
||||
synchronize_net();
|
||||
rcu_barrier();
|
||||
|
||||
ieee80211_flush_queues(local, NULL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user