mmc: sdhci: Setting the host->mrq to NULL before executing tuning
In function sdhci_request(), it is possible to do the tuning execution
like below:
sdhci_request() {
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->mrq = mrq;
...
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
<=== Here it is possible one pending finish_tasklet get running
and it will operate the original mrq, and notified the mrq
is done, and causes memory corruption.
sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, tuning_opcode);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->mrq = mrq;
...
}
In the above race place, the original mrq should not be finished wrongly,
so here before unlock the spinlock, we need to set the host->mrq to NULL
to avoid this case.
Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Chris Ball
parent
0041113547
commit
63c211803a
@@ -1396,6 +1396,13 @@ static void sdhci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
|
||||
mmc->card->type == MMC_TYPE_MMC ?
|
||||
MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200 :
|
||||
MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Here we need to set the host->mrq to NULL,
|
||||
* in case the pending finish_tasklet
|
||||
* finishes it incorrectly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
host->mrq = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
|
||||
sdhci_execute_tuning(mmc, tuning_opcode);
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user