bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no free elems
This patch use head->first in pcpu_freelist_head to check freelist
having free or not. If having, grab spin_lock, or check next cpu's
freelist.
Before patch: hash_map performance
./map_perf_test 1
0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1043397 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec.
hash_map the worst: no free
./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh
Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'...
Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started.
1:hash_map_full_perf 15687 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 16000 events per sec.
ftrace trace:
0) | htab_map_update_elem() {
0) | __pcpu_freelist_pop() {
0) | _raw_spin_lock()
0) | _raw_spin_unlock()
0) | ...
0) + 25.188 us | }
0) + 28.439 us | }
The test machine is 16C, trying to get spin_lock 17 times, in addition
to 16c, there is an extralist.
after patch: hash_map performance
./map_perf_test 1
0:hash_map_perf pre-alloc 1053298 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 1050000 events per sec.
hash_map worst: no free
./run_bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.sh
Setting up benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update'...
Benchmark 'bpf-hashmap-ful-update' started.
1:hash_map_full_perf 555830 events per sec
...
The average of the test results is around 550000 events per sec.
ftrace trace:
0) | htab_map_update_elem() {
0) | alloc_htab_elem() {
0) 0.586 us | __pcpu_freelist_pop();
0) 0.945 us | }
0) 8.669 us | }
It can be seen that after adding this patch, the map performance is
almost not degraded, and when free=0, first check head->first instead of
directly acquiring spin_lock.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610023308.93798-2-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Alexei Starovoitov
parent
fe92833524
commit
54a9c3a42d
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline void pcpu_freelist_push_node(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head,
|
||||
struct pcpu_freelist_node *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
node->next = head->first;
|
||||
head->first = node;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head,
|
||||
@@ -130,14 +130,17 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
|
||||
orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
|
||||
goto next_cpu;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&head->lock);
|
||||
node = head->first;
|
||||
if (node) {
|
||||
head->first = node->next;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node->next);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
next_cpu:
|
||||
cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
|
||||
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
||||
cpu = 0;
|
||||
@@ -146,10 +149,12 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* per cpu lists are all empty, try extralist */
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(s->extralist.first))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&s->extralist.lock);
|
||||
node = s->extralist.first;
|
||||
if (node)
|
||||
s->extralist.first = node->next;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(s->extralist.first, node->next);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&s->extralist.lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -164,15 +169,18 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
|
||||
orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
|
||||
goto next_cpu;
|
||||
if (raw_spin_trylock(&head->lock)) {
|
||||
node = head->first;
|
||||
if (node) {
|
||||
head->first = node->next;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(head->first, node->next);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next_cpu:
|
||||
cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
|
||||
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
|
||||
cpu = 0;
|
||||
@@ -181,11 +189,11 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* cannot pop from per cpu lists, try extralist */
|
||||
if (!raw_spin_trylock(&s->extralist.lock))
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(s->extralist.first) || !raw_spin_trylock(&s->extralist.lock))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
node = s->extralist.first;
|
||||
if (node)
|
||||
s->extralist.first = node->next;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(s->extralist.first, node->next);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&s->extralist.lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user