x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() generates a nodemask of nodes which have
memory according to a meminfo descriptor.
The two callsites of that function both set bits in copies of the
numa_nodes_parsed nodemask. In both cases, the information in supplied
numa_meminfo is a subset of numa_nodes_parsed. So setting those bits
again is not really necessary.
Here are the three call paths which show that the supplied numa_meminfo
argument describes memory regions in nodes which are already in
numa_nodes_parsed:
x86_numa_init()
numa_init()
Case 1:
acpi_numa_init()
acpi_parse_memory_affinity()
numa_add_memblk()
node_set(numa_nodes_parsed)
acpi_parse_slit()
acpi_numa_slit_init()
numa_set_distance()
numa_alloc_distance()
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()
Case 2:
amd_numa_init()
numa_add_memblk()
node_set(numa_nodes_parsed)
Case 3
dummy_numa_init()
node_set(numa_nodes_parsed)
numa_add_memblk()
numa_register_memblks()
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()
Thus, in all three cases, the respective bit in numa_nodes_parsed is
set, which means it is not necessary to set it again in a copy of
numa_nodes_parsed.
So remove that function.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170314030801.13656-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
[ Heavily massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Thomas Gleixner
parent
43dac8f6a7
commit
474aeffd88
@@ -314,20 +314,6 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set nodes, which have memory in @mi, in *@nodemask.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask,
|
||||
const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++)
|
||||
if (mi->blk[i].start != mi->blk[i].end &&
|
||||
mi->blk[i].nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
|
||||
node_set(mi->blk[i].nid, *nodemask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* numa_reset_distance - Reset NUMA distance table
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -347,16 +333,12 @@ void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
|
||||
size_t size;
|
||||
int i, j, cnt = 0;
|
||||
u64 phys;
|
||||
|
||||
/* size the new table and allocate it */
|
||||
nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed;
|
||||
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&nodes_parsed, &numa_meminfo);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(i, numa_nodes_parsed)
|
||||
cnt = i;
|
||||
cnt++;
|
||||
size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
|
||||
@@ -535,7 +517,6 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
|
||||
node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
|
||||
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi);
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user