genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region
Aside of being conceptually wrong, there is also an actual (hard to trigger and mostly theoretical) problem. CPU0 CPU1 free_irq(X) interrupt X spin_lock(desc->lock) wake irq thread() spin_unlock(desc->lock) spin_lock(desc->lock) remove action() shutdown_irq() release_resources() thread_handler() spin_unlock(desc->lock) access released resources. synchronize_irq() Move the release resources invocation after synchronize_irq() so it's guaranteed that the threaded handler has finished. Move the resource request call out of the desc->lock held region as well, so the invocation context is the same for both request and release. This solves the problems with those functions on RT as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214344.117028181@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									9114014cf4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						46e48e2573
					
				| @ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) | ||||
| 		new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex); | ||||
| 	if (!desc->action) { | ||||
| 		ret = irq_request_resources(desc); | ||||
| 		if (ret) { | ||||
| 			pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n", | ||||
| 			       new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name); | ||||
| 			goto out_mutex; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	chip_bus_lock(desc); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (!shared) { | ||||
| 		ret = irq_request_resources(desc); | ||||
| 		if (ret) { | ||||
| 			pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n", | ||||
| 			       new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name); | ||||
| 			goto out_unlock; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		/* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */ | ||||
| @ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ out_unlock: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (!desc->action) | ||||
| 		irq_release_resources(desc); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| out_mutex: | ||||
| 	mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| out_thread: | ||||
| @ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) | ||||
| 	if (!desc->action) { | ||||
| 		irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc); | ||||
| 		irq_shutdown(desc); | ||||
| 		irq_release_resources(desc); | ||||
| 		irq_remove_timings(desc); | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (!desc->action) | ||||
| 		irq_release_resources(desc); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user