rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()
There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's functions. This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8fd119b652
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						33dbdbf025
					
				| @ -1270,13 +1270,13 @@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(void) | ||||
|  * that don't support NMI-based stack dumps.  The NMI-triggered stack | ||||
|  * traces are more accurate because they are printed by the target CPU. | ||||
|  */ | ||||
| static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(struct rcu_state *rsp) | ||||
| static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	int cpu; | ||||
| 	unsigned long flags; | ||||
| 	struct rcu_node *rnp; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) { | ||||
| 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(&rcu_state, rnp) { | ||||
| 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); | ||||
| 		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) | ||||
| 			if (rnp->qsmask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) | ||||
| @ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gp_seq) | ||||
| 	       smp_processor_id(), (long)(jiffies - rsp->gp_start), | ||||
| 	       (long)rcu_seq_current(&rsp->gp_seq), totqlen); | ||||
| 	if (ndetected) { | ||||
| 		rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp); | ||||
| 		rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		/* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */ | ||||
| 		rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp); | ||||
| @ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static void print_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp); | ||||
| 	rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); | ||||
| 	/* Rewrite if needed in case of slow consoles. */ | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user