make build_open_flags() treat O_CREAT | O_EXCL as implying O_NOFOLLOW
O_CREAT | O_EXCL means "-EEXIST if we run into a trailing symlink". As it is, we might or might not have LOOKUP_FOLLOW in op->intent in that case - that depends upon having O_NOFOLLOW in open flags. It doesn't matter, since we won't be checking it in that case - do_last() bails out earlier. However, making sure it's not set (i.e. acting as if we had an explicit O_NOFOLLOW) makes the behaviour more explicit and allows to reorder the check for O_CREAT | O_EXCL in do_last() with the call of step_into() immediately following it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									1c9f5e06a6
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						31d1726d72
					
				
							
								
								
									
										15
									
								
								fs/namei.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										15
									
								
								fs/namei.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							| @ -3396,22 +3396,17 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd, | ||||
| 	if (unlikely(error < 0)) | ||||
| 		return error; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * create/update audit record if it already exists. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	audit_inode(nd->name, path.dentry, 0); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (unlikely((open_flag & (O_EXCL | O_CREAT)) == (O_EXCL | O_CREAT))) { | ||||
| 		path_to_nameidata(&path, nd); | ||||
| 		return -EEXIST; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */ | ||||
| 	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry); | ||||
| finish_lookup: | ||||
| 	error = step_into(nd, &path, 0, inode, seq); | ||||
| 	if (unlikely(error)) | ||||
| 		return error; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (unlikely((open_flag & (O_EXCL | O_CREAT)) == (O_EXCL | O_CREAT))) { | ||||
| 		audit_inode(nd->name, nd->path.dentry, 0); | ||||
| 		return -EEXIST; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| finish_open: | ||||
| 	/* Why this, you ask?  _Now_ we might have grown LOOKUP_JUMPED... */ | ||||
| 	error = complete_walk(nd); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user