kernel/debug/debug_core.c: more properly delay for secondary CPUs
We've got a delay loop waiting for secondary CPUs. That loop uses loops_per_jiffy. However, loops_per_jiffy doesn't actually mean how many tight loops make up a jiffy on all architectures. It is quite common to see things like this in the boot log: Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 48.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=24000) In my case I was seeing lots of cases where other CPUs timed out entering the debugger only to print their stack crawls shortly after the kdb> prompt was written. Elsewhere in kgdb we already use udelay(), so that should be safe enough to use to implement our timeout. We'll delay 1 ms for 1000 times, which should give us a full second of delay (just like the old code wanted) but allow us to notice that we're done every 1 ms. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: simplifications, per Daniel] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477091361-2039-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.0+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									db862358a4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						2d13bb6494
					
				| @ -598,11 +598,11 @@ return_normal: | ||||
| 	/*
 | ||||
| 	 * Wait for the other CPUs to be notified and be waiting for us: | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	time_left = loops_per_jiffy * HZ; | ||||
| 	time_left = MSEC_PER_SEC; | ||||
| 	while (kgdb_do_roundup && --time_left && | ||||
| 	       (atomic_read(&masters_in_kgdb) + atomic_read(&slaves_in_kgdb)) != | ||||
| 		   online_cpus) | ||||
| 		cpu_relax(); | ||||
| 		udelay(1000); | ||||
| 	if (!time_left) | ||||
| 		pr_crit("Timed out waiting for secondary CPUs.\n"); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user