forked from Minki/linux
fix races between __d_instantiate() and checks of dentry flags
in non-lazy walk we need to be careful about dentry switching from negative to positive - both ->d_flags and ->d_inode are updated, and in some places we might see only one store. The cases where dentry has been obtained by dcache lookup with ->i_mutex held on parent are safe - ->d_lock and ->i_mutex provide all the barriers we need. However, there are several places where we run into trouble: * do_last() fetches ->d_inode, then checks ->d_flags and assumes that inode won't be NULL unless d_is_negative() is true. Race with e.g. creat() - we might have fetched the old value of ->d_inode (still NULL) and new value of ->d_flags (already not DCACHE_MISS_TYPE). Lin Ming has observed and reported the resulting oops. * a bunch of places checks ->d_inode for being non-NULL, then checks ->d_flags for "is it a symlink". Race with symlink(2) in case if our CPU sees ->d_inode update first - we see non-NULL there, but ->d_flags still contains DCACHE_MISS_TYPE instead of DCACHE_SYMLINK_TYPE. Result: false negative on "should we follow link here?", with subsequent unpleasantness. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.13 and 3.14 need that one Reported-and-tested-by: Lin Ming <minggr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9eaa447e7
commit
22213318af
@ -1647,8 +1647,7 @@ static void __d_instantiate(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
|
||||
unsigned add_flags = d_flags_for_inode(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE;
|
||||
dentry->d_flags |= add_flags;
|
||||
__d_set_type(dentry, add_flags);
|
||||
if (inode)
|
||||
hlist_add_head(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
|
||||
dentry->d_inode = inode;
|
||||
|
@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ static inline int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
|
||||
inode = path->dentry->d_inode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
err = -ENOENT;
|
||||
if (!inode)
|
||||
if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry))
|
||||
goto out_path_put;
|
||||
|
||||
if (should_follow_link(path->dentry, follow)) {
|
||||
@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ mountpoint_last(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path)
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
done:
|
||||
if (!dentry->d_inode) {
|
||||
if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) {
|
||||
error = -ENOENT;
|
||||
dput(dentry);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ retry_lookup:
|
||||
finish_lookup:
|
||||
/* we _can_ be in RCU mode here */
|
||||
error = -ENOENT;
|
||||
if (d_is_negative(path->dentry)) {
|
||||
if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry)) {
|
||||
path_to_nameidata(path, nd);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user