staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd
Rather an using l_wait_event(), use wait_event_idle_timeout() with an explicit loop so it is easier to see what is happening. Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fdeb5f9a51
commit
0a0e5afcb2
@ -2618,7 +2618,7 @@ ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd(struct ptlrpc_service *svc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ptlrpc_service_part *svcpt;
|
||||
struct ptlrpc_request_buffer_desc *rqbd;
|
||||
struct l_wait_info lwi;
|
||||
int cnt;
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2658,12 +2658,13 @@ ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd(struct ptlrpc_service *svc)
|
||||
* the HUGE timeout lets us CWARN for visibility
|
||||
* of sluggish LNDs
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(
|
||||
LONG_UNLINK * HZ,
|
||||
HZ, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
rc = l_wait_event(svcpt->scp_waitq,
|
||||
svcpt->scp_nrqbds_posted == 0, &lwi);
|
||||
if (rc == -ETIMEDOUT) {
|
||||
cnt = 0;
|
||||
while (cnt < LONG_UNLINK &&
|
||||
(rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(svcpt->scp_waitq,
|
||||
svcpt->scp_nrqbds_posted == 0,
|
||||
HZ)) == 0)
|
||||
cnt ++;
|
||||
if (rc == 0) {
|
||||
CWARN("Service %s waiting for request buffers\n",
|
||||
svcpt->scp_service->srv_name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user