staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx

Replace l_wait_event with wait_event_idle_timeout() and call the
handler function explicitly.  This makes it more clear
what is happening.

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
NeilBrown 2018-02-13 10:47:59 +11:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent c7621ba215
commit fdeb5f9a51

View File

@ -554,9 +554,8 @@ int ctx_check_refresh(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
}
static
int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
int ctx_refresh_timeout(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
{
struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
int rc;
/* conn_cnt is needed in expire_one_request */
@ -575,10 +574,8 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
}
static
void ctx_refresh_interrupt(void *data)
void ctx_refresh_interrupt(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
{
struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
spin_lock(&req->rq_lock);
req->rq_intr = 1;
spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
@ -611,7 +608,6 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
{
struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx = req->rq_cli_ctx;
struct ptlrpc_sec *sec;
struct l_wait_info lwi;
int rc;
LASSERT(ctx);
@ -743,10 +739,28 @@ again:
req->rq_restart = 0;
spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(msecs_to_jiffies(timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC),
ctx_refresh_timeout, ctx_refresh_interrupt,
req);
rc = l_wait_event(req->rq_reply_waitq, ctx_check_refresh(ctx), &lwi);
rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(req->rq_reply_waitq,
ctx_check_refresh(ctx),
timeout * HZ);
if (rc == 0 && ctx_refresh_timeout(req) == 0) {
/* Keep waiting, but enable some signals */
rc = l_wait_event_abortable(req->rq_reply_waitq,
ctx_check_refresh(ctx));
if (rc == 0)
rc = 1;
}
if (rc > 0)
/* condition is true */
rc = 0;
else if (rc == 0)
/* Timed out */
rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
else {
/* Aborted by signal */
rc = -EINTR;
ctx_refresh_interrupt(req);
}
/*
* following cases could lead us here: