linux/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c

3698 lines
82 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Single-step support.
*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Paul Mackerras <paulus@au.ibm.com>, IBM
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/prefetch.h>
#include <asm/sstep.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/cpu_has_feature.h>
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#include <asm/cputable.h>
#include <asm/disassemble.h>
extern char system_call_common[];
extern char system_call_vectored_emulate[];
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
/* Bits in SRR1 that are copied from MSR */
#define MSR_MASK 0xffffffff87c0ffffUL
#else
#define MSR_MASK 0x87c0ffff
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/* Bits in XER */
#define XER_SO 0x80000000U
#define XER_OV 0x40000000U
#define XER_CA 0x20000000U
#define XER_OV32 0x00080000U
#define XER_CA32 0x00040000U
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
#define VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd) ((((rd) & 1) << 5) | ((rd) & 0xfe))
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Functions in ldstfp.S
*/
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
extern void get_fpr(int rn, double *p);
extern void put_fpr(int rn, const double *p);
extern void get_vr(int rn, __vector128 *p);
extern void put_vr(int rn, __vector128 *p);
extern void load_vsrn(int vsr, const void *p);
extern void store_vsrn(int vsr, void *p);
extern void conv_sp_to_dp(const float *sp, double *dp);
extern void conv_dp_to_sp(const double *dp, float *sp);
#endif
#ifdef __powerpc64__
/*
* Functions in quad.S
*/
extern int do_lq(unsigned long ea, unsigned long *regs);
extern int do_stq(unsigned long ea, unsigned long val0, unsigned long val1);
extern int do_lqarx(unsigned long ea, unsigned long *regs);
extern int do_stqcx(unsigned long ea, unsigned long val0, unsigned long val1,
unsigned int *crp);
#endif
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
#define IS_LE 1
#define IS_BE 0
#else
#define IS_LE 0
#define IS_BE 1
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Emulate the truncation of 64 bit values in 32-bit mode.
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long truncate_if_32bit(unsigned long msr,
unsigned long val)
{
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if ((msr & MSR_64BIT) == 0)
val &= 0xffffffffUL;
#endif
return val;
}
/*
* Determine whether a conditional branch instruction would branch.
*/
static nokprobe_inline int branch_taken(unsigned int instr,
const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op)
{
unsigned int bo = (instr >> 21) & 0x1f;
unsigned int bi;
if ((bo & 4) == 0) {
/* decrement counter */
op->type |= DECCTR;
if (((bo >> 1) & 1) ^ (regs->ctr == 1))
return 0;
}
if ((bo & 0x10) == 0) {
/* check bit from CR */
bi = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
if (((regs->ccr >> (31 - bi)) & 1) != ((bo >> 3) & 1))
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
static nokprobe_inline long address_ok(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long ea, int nb)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
if (!user_mode(regs))
return 1;
if (__access_ok(ea, nb))
return 1;
if (__access_ok(ea, 1))
/* Access overlaps the end of the user region */
regs->dar = TASK_SIZE_MAX - 1;
else
regs->dar = ea;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
/*
* Calculate effective address for a D-form instruction
*/
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long dform_ea(unsigned int instr,
const struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int ra;
unsigned long ea;
ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
ea = (signed short) instr; /* sign-extend */
if (ra)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ea += regs->gpr[ra];
return ea;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
#ifdef __powerpc64__
/*
* Calculate effective address for a DS-form instruction
*/
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long dsform_ea(unsigned int instr,
const struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int ra;
unsigned long ea;
ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
ea = (signed short) (instr & ~3); /* sign-extend */
if (ra)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ea += regs->gpr[ra];
return ea;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
/*
* Calculate effective address for a DQ-form instruction
*/
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long dqform_ea(unsigned int instr,
const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ra;
unsigned long ea;
ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
ea = (signed short) (instr & ~0xf); /* sign-extend */
if (ra)
ea += regs->gpr[ra];
return ea;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* __powerpc64 */
/*
* Calculate effective address for an X-form instruction
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long xform_ea(unsigned int instr,
const struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int ra, rb;
unsigned long ea;
ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
rb = (instr >> 11) & 0x1f;
ea = regs->gpr[rb];
if (ra)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ea += regs->gpr[ra];
return ea;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
/*
* Calculate effective address for a MLS:D-form / 8LS:D-form
* prefixed instruction
*/
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long mlsd_8lsd_ea(unsigned int instr,
unsigned int suffix,
const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ra, prefix_r;
unsigned int dd;
unsigned long ea, d0, d1, d;
prefix_r = GET_PREFIX_R(instr);
ra = GET_PREFIX_RA(suffix);
d0 = instr & 0x3ffff;
d1 = suffix & 0xffff;
d = (d0 << 16) | d1;
/*
* sign extend a 34 bit number
*/
dd = (unsigned int)(d >> 2);
ea = (signed int)dd;
ea = (ea << 2) | (d & 0x3);
if (!prefix_r && ra)
ea += regs->gpr[ra];
else if (!prefix_r && !ra)
; /* Leave ea as is */
else if (prefix_r)
ea += regs->nip;
/*
* (prefix_r && ra) is an invalid form. Should already be
* checked for by caller!
*/
return ea;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Return the largest power of 2, not greater than sizeof(unsigned long),
* such that x is a multiple of it.
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long max_align(unsigned long x)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
x |= sizeof(unsigned long);
return x & -x; /* isolates rightmost bit */
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long byterev_2(unsigned long x)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
return ((x >> 8) & 0xff) | ((x & 0xff) << 8);
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long byterev_4(unsigned long x)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
return ((x >> 24) & 0xff) | ((x >> 8) & 0xff00) |
((x & 0xff00) << 8) | ((x & 0xff) << 24);
}
#ifdef __powerpc64__
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long byterev_8(unsigned long x)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
return (byterev_4(x) << 32) | byterev_4(x >> 32);
}
#endif
static nokprobe_inline void do_byte_reverse(void *ptr, int nb)
{
switch (nb) {
case 2:
*(u16 *)ptr = byterev_2(*(u16 *)ptr);
break;
case 4:
*(u32 *)ptr = byterev_4(*(u32 *)ptr);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
*(unsigned long *)ptr = byterev_8(*(unsigned long *)ptr);
break;
case 16: {
unsigned long *up = (unsigned long *)ptr;
unsigned long tmp;
tmp = byterev_8(up[0]);
up[0] = byterev_8(up[1]);
up[1] = tmp;
break;
}
case 32: {
unsigned long *up = (unsigned long *)ptr;
unsigned long tmp;
tmp = byterev_8(up[0]);
up[0] = byterev_8(up[3]);
up[3] = tmp;
tmp = byterev_8(up[2]);
up[2] = byterev_8(up[1]);
up[1] = tmp;
break;
}
#endif
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
}
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
static __always_inline int
__read_mem_aligned(unsigned long *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
unsigned long x = 0;
switch (nb) {
case 1:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(x, (unsigned char __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
case 2:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(x, (unsigned short __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
case 4:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(x, (unsigned int __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(x, (unsigned long __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
#endif
}
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
*dest = x;
return 0;
Efault:
regs->dar = ea;
return -EFAULT;
}
static nokprobe_inline int
read_mem_aligned(unsigned long *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int err;
if (is_kernel_addr(ea))
return __read_mem_aligned(dest, ea, nb, regs);
if (user_read_access_begin((void __user *)ea, nb)) {
err = __read_mem_aligned(dest, ea, nb, regs);
user_read_access_end();
} else {
err = -EFAULT;
regs->dar = ea;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return err;
}
/*
* Copy from userspace to a buffer, using the largest possible
* aligned accesses, up to sizeof(long).
*/
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
static __always_inline int __copy_mem_in(u8 *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int c;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
for (; nb > 0; nb -= c) {
c = max_align(ea);
if (c > nb)
c = max_align(nb);
switch (c) {
case 1:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(*dest, (u8 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
case 2:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(*(u16 *)dest, (u16 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
case 4:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(*(u32 *)dest, (u32 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_get_user(*(u64 *)dest, (u64 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
#endif
}
dest += c;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ea += c;
}
return 0;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
Efault:
regs->dar = ea;
return -EFAULT;
}
static nokprobe_inline int copy_mem_in(u8 *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int err;
if (is_kernel_addr(ea))
return __copy_mem_in(dest, ea, nb, regs);
if (user_read_access_begin((void __user *)ea, nb)) {
err = __copy_mem_in(dest, ea, nb, regs);
user_read_access_end();
} else {
err = -EFAULT;
regs->dar = ea;
}
return err;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline int read_mem_unaligned(unsigned long *dest,
unsigned long ea, int nb,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
union {
unsigned long ul;
u8 b[sizeof(unsigned long)];
} u;
int i;
int err;
u.ul = 0;
i = IS_BE ? sizeof(unsigned long) - nb : 0;
err = copy_mem_in(&u.b[i], ea, nb, regs);
if (!err)
*dest = u.ul;
return err;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Read memory at address ea for nb bytes, return 0 for success
* or -EFAULT if an error occurred. N.B. nb must be 1, 2, 4 or 8.
* If nb < sizeof(long), the result is right-justified on BE systems.
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static int read_mem(unsigned long *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, nb))
return -EFAULT;
if ((ea & (nb - 1)) == 0)
return read_mem_aligned(dest, ea, nb, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return read_mem_unaligned(dest, ea, nb, regs);
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(read_mem);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
static __always_inline int
__write_mem_aligned(unsigned long val, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
switch (nb) {
case 1:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(val, (unsigned char __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
case 2:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(val, (unsigned short __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
case 4:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(val, (unsigned int __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(val, (unsigned long __user *)ea, Efault);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
#endif
}
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
return 0;
Efault:
regs->dar = ea;
return -EFAULT;
}
static nokprobe_inline int
write_mem_aligned(unsigned long val, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int err;
if (is_kernel_addr(ea))
return __write_mem_aligned(val, ea, nb, regs);
if (user_write_access_begin((void __user *)ea, nb)) {
err = __write_mem_aligned(val, ea, nb, regs);
user_write_access_end();
} else {
err = -EFAULT;
regs->dar = ea;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return err;
}
/*
* Copy from a buffer to userspace, using the largest possible
* aligned accesses, up to sizeof(long).
*/
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int __copy_mem_out(u8 *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int c;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
for (; nb > 0; nb -= c) {
c = max_align(ea);
if (c > nb)
c = max_align(nb);
switch (c) {
case 1:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(*dest, (u8 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
case 2:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(*(u16 *)dest, (u16 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
case 4:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(*(u32 *)dest, (u32 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsafe_put_user(*(u64 *)dest, (u64 __user *)ea, Efault);
break;
#endif
}
dest += c;
ea += c;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
return 0;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
Efault:
regs->dar = ea;
return -EFAULT;
}
static nokprobe_inline int copy_mem_out(u8 *dest, unsigned long ea, int nb, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int err;
if (is_kernel_addr(ea))
return __copy_mem_out(dest, ea, nb, regs);
if (user_write_access_begin((void __user *)ea, nb)) {
err = __copy_mem_out(dest, ea, nb, regs);
user_write_access_end();
} else {
err = -EFAULT;
regs->dar = ea;
}
return err;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline int write_mem_unaligned(unsigned long val,
unsigned long ea, int nb,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
union {
unsigned long ul;
u8 b[sizeof(unsigned long)];
} u;
int i;
u.ul = val;
i = IS_BE ? sizeof(unsigned long) - nb : 0;
return copy_mem_out(&u.b[i], ea, nb, regs);
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Write memory at address ea for nb bytes, return 0 for success
* or -EFAULT if an error occurred. N.B. nb must be 1, 2, 4 or 8.
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static int write_mem(unsigned long val, unsigned long ea, int nb,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, nb))
return -EFAULT;
if ((ea & (nb - 1)) == 0)
return write_mem_aligned(val, ea, nb, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return write_mem_unaligned(val, ea, nb, regs);
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(write_mem);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
/*
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
* These access either the real FP register or the image in the
* thread_struct, depending on regs->msr & MSR_FP.
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
*/
static int do_fp_load(struct instruction_op *op, unsigned long ea,
struct pt_regs *regs, bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int err, rn, nb;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
union {
int i;
unsigned int u;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
float f;
double d[2];
unsigned long l[2];
u8 b[2 * sizeof(double)];
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
} u;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
nb = GETSIZE(op->type);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, nb))
return -EFAULT;
rn = op->reg;
err = copy_mem_in(u.b, ea, nb, regs);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (err)
return err;
if (unlikely(cross_endian)) {
do_byte_reverse(u.b, min(nb, 8));
if (nb == 16)
do_byte_reverse(&u.b[8], 8);
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_disable();
if (nb == 4) {
if (op->type & FPCONV)
conv_sp_to_dp(&u.f, &u.d[0]);
else if (op->type & SIGNEXT)
u.l[0] = u.i;
else
u.l[0] = u.u;
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP)
put_fpr(rn, &u.d[0]);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
else
current->thread.TS_FPR(rn) = u.l[0];
if (nb == 16) {
/* lfdp */
rn |= 1;
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP)
put_fpr(rn, &u.d[1]);
else
current->thread.TS_FPR(rn) = u.l[1];
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_enable();
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_fp_load);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
static int do_fp_store(struct instruction_op *op, unsigned long ea,
struct pt_regs *regs, bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int rn, nb;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
union {
unsigned int u;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
float f;
double d[2];
unsigned long l[2];
u8 b[2 * sizeof(double)];
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
} u;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
nb = GETSIZE(op->type);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, nb))
return -EFAULT;
rn = op->reg;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_disable();
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP)
get_fpr(rn, &u.d[0]);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
else
u.l[0] = current->thread.TS_FPR(rn);
if (nb == 4) {
if (op->type & FPCONV)
conv_dp_to_sp(&u.d[0], &u.f);
else
u.u = u.l[0];
}
if (nb == 16) {
rn |= 1;
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP)
get_fpr(rn, &u.d[1]);
else
u.l[1] = current->thread.TS_FPR(rn);
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_enable();
if (unlikely(cross_endian)) {
do_byte_reverse(u.b, min(nb, 8));
if (nb == 16)
do_byte_reverse(&u.b[8], 8);
}
return copy_mem_out(u.b, ea, nb, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_fp_store);
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
/* For Altivec/VMX, no need to worry about alignment */
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int do_vec_load(int rn, unsigned long ea,
int size, struct pt_regs *regs,
bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
int err;
union {
__vector128 v;
u8 b[sizeof(__vector128)];
} u = {};
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!address_ok(regs, ea & ~0xfUL, 16))
return -EFAULT;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
/* align to multiple of size */
ea &= ~(size - 1);
err = copy_mem_in(&u.b[ea & 0xf], ea, size, regs);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (err)
return err;
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
do_byte_reverse(&u.b[ea & 0xf], size);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_disable();
if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
put_vr(rn, &u.v);
else
current->thread.vr_state.vr[rn] = u.v;
preempt_enable();
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int do_vec_store(int rn, unsigned long ea,
int size, struct pt_regs *regs,
bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
union {
__vector128 v;
u8 b[sizeof(__vector128)];
} u;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!address_ok(regs, ea & ~0xfUL, 16))
return -EFAULT;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
/* align to multiple of size */
ea &= ~(size - 1);
preempt_disable();
if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC)
get_vr(rn, &u.v);
else
u.v = current->thread.vr_state.vr[rn];
preempt_enable();
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
do_byte_reverse(&u.b[ea & 0xf], size);
return copy_mem_out(&u.b[ea & 0xf], ea, size, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */
#ifdef __powerpc64__
static nokprobe_inline int emulate_lq(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long ea,
int reg, bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int err;
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, 16))
return -EFAULT;
/* if aligned, should be atomic */
if ((ea & 0xf) == 0) {
err = do_lq(ea, &regs->gpr[reg]);
} else {
err = read_mem(&regs->gpr[reg + IS_LE], ea, 8, regs);
if (!err)
err = read_mem(&regs->gpr[reg + IS_BE], ea + 8, 8, regs);
}
if (!err && unlikely(cross_endian))
do_byte_reverse(&regs->gpr[reg], 16);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return err;
}
static nokprobe_inline int emulate_stq(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long ea,
int reg, bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
int err;
unsigned long vals[2];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, 16))
return -EFAULT;
vals[0] = regs->gpr[reg];
vals[1] = regs->gpr[reg + 1];
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
do_byte_reverse(vals, 16);
/* if aligned, should be atomic */
if ((ea & 0xf) == 0)
return do_stq(ea, vals[0], vals[1]);
err = write_mem(vals[IS_LE], ea, 8, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (!err)
err = write_mem(vals[IS_BE], ea + 8, 8, regs);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
return err;
}
#endif /* __powerpc64 */
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
void emulate_vsx_load(struct instruction_op *op, union vsx_reg *reg,
const void *mem, bool rev)
{
int size, read_size;
int i, j;
const unsigned int *wp;
const unsigned short *hp;
const unsigned char *bp;
size = GETSIZE(op->type);
reg->d[0] = reg->d[1] = 0;
switch (op->element_size) {
case 32:
/* [p]lxvp[x] */
case 16:
/* whole vector; lxv[x] or lxvl[l] */
if (size == 0)
break;
memcpy(reg, mem, size);
if (IS_LE && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_LDLEFT))
rev = !rev;
if (rev)
do_byte_reverse(reg, size);
break;
case 8:
/* scalar loads, lxvd2x, lxvdsx */
read_size = (size >= 8) ? 8 : size;
i = IS_LE ? 8 : 8 - read_size;
memcpy(&reg->b[i], mem, read_size);
if (rev)
do_byte_reverse(&reg->b[i], 8);
if (size < 8) {
if (op->type & SIGNEXT) {
/* size == 4 is the only case here */
reg->d[IS_LE] = (signed int) reg->d[IS_LE];
} else if (op->vsx_flags & VSX_FPCONV) {
preempt_disable();
conv_sp_to_dp(&reg->fp[1 + IS_LE],
&reg->dp[IS_LE]);
preempt_enable();
}
} else {
if (size == 16) {
unsigned long v = *(unsigned long *)(mem + 8);
reg->d[IS_BE] = !rev ? v : byterev_8(v);
} else if (op->vsx_flags & VSX_SPLAT)
reg->d[IS_BE] = reg->d[IS_LE];
}
break;
case 4:
/* lxvw4x, lxvwsx */
wp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size / 4; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 3 - j : j;
reg->w[i] = !rev ? *wp++ : byterev_4(*wp++);
}
if (op->vsx_flags & VSX_SPLAT) {
u32 val = reg->w[IS_LE ? 3 : 0];
for (; j < 4; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 3 - j : j;
reg->w[i] = val;
}
}
break;
case 2:
/* lxvh8x */
hp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size / 2; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 7 - j : j;
reg->h[i] = !rev ? *hp++ : byterev_2(*hp++);
}
break;
case 1:
/* lxvb16x */
bp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 15 - j : j;
reg->b[i] = *bp++;
}
break;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(emulate_vsx_load);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_vsx_load);
void emulate_vsx_store(struct instruction_op *op, const union vsx_reg *reg,
void *mem, bool rev)
{
int size, write_size;
int i, j;
union vsx_reg buf;
unsigned int *wp;
unsigned short *hp;
unsigned char *bp;
size = GETSIZE(op->type);
switch (op->element_size) {
case 32:
/* [p]stxvp[x] */
if (size == 0)
break;
if (rev) {
/* reverse 32 bytes */
union vsx_reg buf32[2];
buf32[0].d[0] = byterev_8(reg[1].d[1]);
buf32[0].d[1] = byterev_8(reg[1].d[0]);
buf32[1].d[0] = byterev_8(reg[0].d[1]);
buf32[1].d[1] = byterev_8(reg[0].d[0]);
memcpy(mem, buf32, size);
} else {
memcpy(mem, reg, size);
}
break;
case 16:
/* stxv, stxvx, stxvl, stxvll */
if (size == 0)
break;
if (IS_LE && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_LDLEFT))
rev = !rev;
if (rev) {
/* reverse 16 bytes */
buf.d[0] = byterev_8(reg->d[1]);
buf.d[1] = byterev_8(reg->d[0]);
reg = &buf;
}
memcpy(mem, reg, size);
break;
case 8:
/* scalar stores, stxvd2x */
write_size = (size >= 8) ? 8 : size;
i = IS_LE ? 8 : 8 - write_size;
if (size < 8 && op->vsx_flags & VSX_FPCONV) {
buf.d[0] = buf.d[1] = 0;
preempt_disable();
conv_dp_to_sp(&reg->dp[IS_LE], &buf.fp[1 + IS_LE]);
preempt_enable();
reg = &buf;
}
memcpy(mem, &reg->b[i], write_size);
if (size == 16)
memcpy(mem + 8, &reg->d[IS_BE], 8);
if (unlikely(rev)) {
do_byte_reverse(mem, write_size);
if (size == 16)
do_byte_reverse(mem + 8, 8);
}
break;
case 4:
/* stxvw4x */
wp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size / 4; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 3 - j : j;
*wp++ = !rev ? reg->w[i] : byterev_4(reg->w[i]);
}
break;
case 2:
/* stxvh8x */
hp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size / 2; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 7 - j : j;
*hp++ = !rev ? reg->h[i] : byterev_2(reg->h[i]);
}
break;
case 1:
/* stvxb16x */
bp = mem;
for (j = 0; j < size; ++j) {
i = IS_LE ? 15 - j : j;
*bp++ = reg->b[i];
}
break;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(emulate_vsx_store);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_vsx_store);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int do_vsx_load(struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long ea, struct pt_regs *regs,
bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
{
int reg = op->reg;
int i, j, nr_vsx_regs;
u8 mem[32];
union vsx_reg buf[2];
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
int size = GETSIZE(op->type);
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size) || copy_mem_in(mem, ea, size, regs))
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
return -EFAULT;
powerpc/sstep: Fix VSX instruction emulation Commit af99da74333b ("powerpc/sstep: Support VSX vector paired storage access instructions") added loading and storing 32 word long data into adjacent VSRs. However the calculation used to determine if two VSRs needed to be loaded/stored inadvertently prevented the load/storing taking place for instructions with a data length less than 16 words. This causes the emulation to not function correctly, which can be seen by the alignment_handler selftest: $ ./alignment_handler [snip] test: test_alignment_handler_vsx_207 tags: git_version:powerpc-5.12-1-0-g82d2c16b350f VSX: 2.07B Doing lxsspx: PASSED Doing lxsiwax: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxsiwzx: PASSED Doing stxsspx: PASSED Doing stxsiwx: PASSED failure: test_alignment_handler_vsx_207 test: test_alignment_handler_vsx_300 tags: git_version:powerpc-5.12-1-0-g82d2c16b350f VSX: 3.00B Doing lxsd: PASSED Doing lxsibzx: PASSED Doing lxsihzx: PASSED Doing lxssp: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxv: PASSED Doing lxvb16x: PASSED Doing lxvh8x: PASSED Doing lxvx: PASSED Doing lxvwsx: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxvl: PASSED Doing lxvll: PASSED Doing stxsd: PASSED Doing stxsibx: PASSED Doing stxsihx: PASSED Doing stxssp: PASSED Doing stxv: PASSED Doing stxvb16x: PASSED Doing stxvh8x: PASSED Doing stxvx: PASSED Doing stxvl: PASSED Doing stxvll: PASSED failure: test_alignment_handler_vsx_300 [snip] Fix this by making sure all VSX instruction emulation correctly load/store from the VSRs. Fixes: af99da74333b ("powerpc/sstep: Support VSX vector paired storage access instructions") Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225031946.1458206-1-jniethe5@gmail.com
2021-02-25 03:19:46 +00:00
nr_vsx_regs = max(1ul, size / sizeof(__vector128));
emulate_vsx_load(op, buf, mem, cross_endian);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_disable();
if (reg < 32) {
/* FP regs + extensions */
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
load_vsrn(reg + i, &buf[j].v);
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
} else {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg + i][0] = buf[j].d[0];
current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg + i][1] = buf[j].d[1];
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
}
} else {
if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
load_vsrn(reg + i, &buf[j].v);
}
} else {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32 + i] = buf[j].v;
}
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
}
preempt_enable();
return 0;
}
static nokprobe_inline int do_vsx_store(struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long ea, struct pt_regs *regs,
bool cross_endian)
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
{
int reg = op->reg;
int i, j, nr_vsx_regs;
u8 mem[32];
union vsx_reg buf[2];
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
int size = GETSIZE(op->type);
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
powerpc/sstep: Fix VSX instruction emulation Commit af99da74333b ("powerpc/sstep: Support VSX vector paired storage access instructions") added loading and storing 32 word long data into adjacent VSRs. However the calculation used to determine if two VSRs needed to be loaded/stored inadvertently prevented the load/storing taking place for instructions with a data length less than 16 words. This causes the emulation to not function correctly, which can be seen by the alignment_handler selftest: $ ./alignment_handler [snip] test: test_alignment_handler_vsx_207 tags: git_version:powerpc-5.12-1-0-g82d2c16b350f VSX: 2.07B Doing lxsspx: PASSED Doing lxsiwax: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxsiwzx: PASSED Doing stxsspx: PASSED Doing stxsiwx: PASSED failure: test_alignment_handler_vsx_207 test: test_alignment_handler_vsx_300 tags: git_version:powerpc-5.12-1-0-g82d2c16b350f VSX: 3.00B Doing lxsd: PASSED Doing lxsibzx: PASSED Doing lxsihzx: PASSED Doing lxssp: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxv: PASSED Doing lxvb16x: PASSED Doing lxvh8x: PASSED Doing lxvx: PASSED Doing lxvwsx: FAILED: Wrong Data Doing lxvl: PASSED Doing lxvll: PASSED Doing stxsd: PASSED Doing stxsibx: PASSED Doing stxsihx: PASSED Doing stxssp: PASSED Doing stxv: PASSED Doing stxvb16x: PASSED Doing stxvh8x: PASSED Doing stxvx: PASSED Doing stxvl: PASSED Doing stxvll: PASSED failure: test_alignment_handler_vsx_300 [snip] Fix this by making sure all VSX instruction emulation correctly load/store from the VSRs. Fixes: af99da74333b ("powerpc/sstep: Support VSX vector paired storage access instructions") Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225031946.1458206-1-jniethe5@gmail.com
2021-02-25 03:19:46 +00:00
nr_vsx_regs = max(1ul, size / sizeof(__vector128));
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
preempt_disable();
if (reg < 32) {
/* FP regs + extensions */
if (regs->msr & MSR_FP) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
store_vsrn(reg + i, &buf[j].v);
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
} else {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
buf[j].d[0] = current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg + i][0];
buf[j].d[1] = current->thread.fp_state.fpr[reg + i][1];
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
}
} else {
if (regs->msr & MSR_VEC) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
store_vsrn(reg + i, &buf[j].v);
}
} else {
for (i = 0; i < nr_vsx_regs; i++) {
j = IS_LE ? nr_vsx_regs - i - 1 : i;
buf[j].v = current->thread.vr_state.vr[reg - 32 + i];
}
}
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
}
preempt_enable();
emulate_vsx_store(op, buf, mem, cross_endian);
return copy_mem_out(mem, ea, size, regs);
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
static int __emulate_dcbz(unsigned long ea)
{
unsigned long i;
unsigned long size = l1_dcache_bytes();
for (i = 0; i < size; i += sizeof(long))
unsafe_put_user(0, (unsigned long __user *)(ea + i), Efault);
return 0;
Efault:
return -EFAULT;
}
int emulate_dcbz(unsigned long ea, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int err;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
unsigned long size;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
size = ppc64_caches.l1d.block_size;
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_64BIT))
ea &= 0xffffffffUL;
#else
size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
#endif
ea &= ~(size - 1);
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
if (is_kernel_addr(ea)) {
err = __emulate_dcbz(ea);
} else if (user_write_access_begin((void __user *)ea, size)) {
err = __emulate_dcbz(ea);
user_write_access_end();
} else {
err = -EFAULT;
}
powerpc/lib/sstep: Don't use __{get/put}_user() on kernel addresses In the old days, when we didn't have kernel userspace access protection and had set_fs(), it was wise to use __get_user() and friends to read kernel memory. Nowadays, get_user() and put_user() are granting userspace access and are exclusively for userspace access. Convert single step emulation functions to user_access_begin() and friends and use unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user(). When addressing kernel addresses, there is no need to open userspace access. And for book3s/32 it is particularly important to no try and open userspace access on kernel address, because that would break the content of kernel space segment registers. No guard has been put against that risk in order to avoid degrading performance. copy_from_kernel_nofault() and copy_to_kernel_nofault() should be used but they are out-of-line functions which would degrade performance. Those two functions are making use of __get_kernel_nofault() and __put_kernel_nofault() macros. Those two macros are just wrappers behind __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). unsafe_get_user() and unsafe_put_user() are also wrappers of __get_user_size_goto() and __put_user_size_goto(). Use them to access kernel space. That allows refactoring userspace and kernelspace access. Reported-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Depends-on: 4fe5cda9f89d ("powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/22831c9d17f948680a12c5292e7627288b15f713.1631817805.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-09-16 18:43:36 +00:00
if (err)
regs->dar = ea;
return err;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_dcbz);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#define __put_user_asmx(x, addr, err, op, cr) \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: " op " %2,0,%3\n" \
" mfcr %1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
"3: li %0,%4\n" \
" b 2b\n" \
".previous\n" \
EX_TABLE(1b, 3b) \
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
: "=r" (err), "=r" (cr) \
: "r" (x), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
#define __get_user_asmx(x, addr, err, op) \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: "op" %1,0,%2\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
"3: li %0,%3\n" \
" b 2b\n" \
".previous\n" \
EX_TABLE(1b, 3b) \
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
: "=r" (err), "=r" (x) \
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
#define __cacheop_user_asmx(addr, err, op) \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: "op" 0,%1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
"3: li %0,%3\n" \
" b 2b\n" \
".previous\n" \
EX_TABLE(1b, 3b) \
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
: "=r" (err) \
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
static nokprobe_inline void set_cr0(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
long val = op->val;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
op->type |= SETCC;
op->ccval = (regs->ccr & 0x0fffffff) | ((regs->xer >> 3) & 0x10000000);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_64BIT))
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = (int) val;
#endif
if (val < 0)
op->ccval |= 0x80000000;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else if (val > 0)
op->ccval |= 0x40000000;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->ccval |= 0x20000000;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline void set_ca32(struct instruction_op *op, bool val)
{
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
if (val)
op->xerval |= XER_CA32;
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA32;
}
}
static nokprobe_inline void add_with_carry(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op, int rd,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
unsigned long val1, unsigned long val2,
unsigned long carry_in)
{
unsigned long val = val1 + val2;
if (carry_in)
++val;
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG + SETXER;
op->reg = rd;
op->val = val;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_64BIT)) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = (unsigned int) val;
val1 = (unsigned int) val1;
}
#endif
op->xerval = regs->xer;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (val < val1 || (carry_in && val == val1))
op->xerval |= XER_CA;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA;
set_ca32(op, (unsigned int)val < (unsigned int)val1 ||
(carry_in && (unsigned int)val == (unsigned int)val1));
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline void do_cmp_signed(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
long v1, long v2, int crfld)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
unsigned int crval, shift;
op->type = COMPUTE + SETCC;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
crval = (regs->xer >> 31) & 1; /* get SO bit */
if (v1 < v2)
crval |= 8;
else if (v1 > v2)
crval |= 4;
else
crval |= 2;
shift = (7 - crfld) * 4;
op->ccval = (regs->ccr & ~(0xf << shift)) | (crval << shift);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline void do_cmp_unsigned(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long v1,
unsigned long v2, int crfld)
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
{
unsigned int crval, shift;
op->type = COMPUTE + SETCC;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
crval = (regs->xer >> 31) & 1; /* get SO bit */
if (v1 < v2)
crval |= 8;
else if (v1 > v2)
crval |= 4;
else
crval |= 2;
shift = (7 - crfld) * 4;
op->ccval = (regs->ccr & ~(0xf << shift)) | (crval << shift);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
static nokprobe_inline void do_cmpb(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long v1, unsigned long v2)
{
unsigned long long out_val, mask;
int i;
out_val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
mask = 0xffUL << (i * 8);
if ((v1 & mask) == (v2 & mask))
out_val |= mask;
}
op->val = out_val;
}
/*
* The size parameter is used to adjust the equivalent popcnt instruction.
* popcntb = 8, popcntw = 32, popcntd = 64
*/
static nokprobe_inline void do_popcnt(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long v1, int size)
{
unsigned long long out = v1;
out -= (out >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555ULL;
out = (0x3333333333333333ULL & out) +
(0x3333333333333333ULL & (out >> 2));
out = (out + (out >> 4)) & 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0fULL;
if (size == 8) { /* popcntb */
op->val = out;
return;
}
out += out >> 8;
out += out >> 16;
if (size == 32) { /* popcntw */
op->val = out & 0x0000003f0000003fULL;
return;
}
out = (out + (out >> 32)) & 0x7f;
op->val = out; /* popcntd */
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
static nokprobe_inline void do_bpermd(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long v1, unsigned long v2)
{
unsigned char perm, idx;
unsigned int i;
perm = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
idx = (v1 >> (i * 8)) & 0xff;
if (idx < 64)
if (v2 & PPC_BIT(idx))
perm |= 1 << i;
}
op->val = perm;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
/*
* The size parameter adjusts the equivalent prty instruction.
* prtyw = 32, prtyd = 64
*/
static nokprobe_inline void do_prty(const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct instruction_op *op,
unsigned long v, int size)
{
unsigned long long res = v ^ (v >> 8);
res ^= res >> 16;
if (size == 32) { /* prtyw */
op->val = res & 0x0000000100000001ULL;
return;
}
res ^= res >> 32;
op->val = res & 1; /*prtyd */
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int trap_compare(long v1, long v2)
{
int ret = 0;
if (v1 < v2)
ret |= 0x10;
else if (v1 > v2)
ret |= 0x08;
else
ret |= 0x04;
if ((unsigned long)v1 < (unsigned long)v2)
ret |= 0x02;
else if ((unsigned long)v1 > (unsigned long)v2)
ret |= 0x01;
return ret;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Elements of 32-bit rotate and mask instructions.
*/
#define MASK32(mb, me) ((0xffffffffUL >> (mb)) + \
((signed long)-0x80000000L >> (me)) + ((me) >= (mb)))
#ifdef __powerpc64__
#define MASK64_L(mb) (~0UL >> (mb))
#define MASK64_R(me) ((signed long)-0x8000000000000000L >> (me))
#define MASK64(mb, me) (MASK64_L(mb) + MASK64_R(me) + ((me) >= (mb)))
#define DATA32(x) (((x) & 0xffffffffUL) | (((x) & 0xffffffffUL) << 32))
#else
#define DATA32(x) (x)
#endif
#define ROTATE(x, n) ((n) ? (((x) << (n)) | ((x) >> (8 * sizeof(long) - (n)))) : (x))
/*
* Decode an instruction, and return information about it in *op
* without changing *regs.
* Integer arithmetic and logical instructions, branches, and barrier
* instructions can be emulated just using the information in *op.
*
* Return value is 1 if the instruction can be emulated just by
* updating *regs with the information in *op, -1 if we need the
* GPRs but *regs doesn't contain the full register set, or 0
* otherwise.
*/
int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
struct ppc_inst instr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
unsigned int suffixopcode, prefixtype, prefix_r;
#endif
unsigned int opcode, ra, rb, rc, rd, spr, u;
unsigned long int imm;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
unsigned long int val, val2;
unsigned int mb, me, sh;
unsigned int word, suffix;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
long ival;
word = ppc_inst_val(instr);
suffix = ppc_inst_suffix(instr);
op->type = COMPUTE;
opcode = ppc_inst_primary_opcode(instr);
switch (opcode) {
case 16: /* bc */
op->type = BRANCH;
imm = (signed short)(word & 0xfffc);
if ((word & 2) == 0)
imm += regs->nip;
op->val = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, imm);
if (word & 1)
op->type |= SETLK;
if (branch_taken(word, regs, op))
op->type |= BRTAKEN;
return 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
case 17: /* sc */
if ((word & 0xfe2) == 2)
op->type = SYSCALL;
else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) &&
(word & 0xfe3) == 1) { /* scv */
op->type = SYSCALL_VECTORED_0;
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
} else
op->type = UNKNOWN;
return 0;
#endif
case 18: /* b */
op->type = BRANCH | BRTAKEN;
imm = word & 0x03fffffc;
if (imm & 0x02000000)
imm -= 0x04000000;
if ((word & 2) == 0)
imm += regs->nip;
op->val = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, imm);
if (word & 1)
op->type |= SETLK;
return 1;
case 19:
switch ((word >> 1) & 0x3ff) {
case 0: /* mcrf */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETCC;
rd = 7 - ((word >> 23) & 0x7);
ra = 7 - ((word >> 18) & 0x7);
rd *= 4;
ra *= 4;
val = (regs->ccr >> ra) & 0xf;
op->ccval = (regs->ccr & ~(0xfUL << rd)) | (val << rd);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 16: /* bclr */
case 528: /* bcctr */
op->type = BRANCH;
imm = (word & 0x400)? regs->ctr: regs->link;
op->val = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, imm);
if (word & 1)
op->type |= SETLK;
if (branch_taken(word, regs, op))
op->type |= BRTAKEN;
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 18: /* rfid, scary */
if (regs->msr & MSR_PR)
goto priv;
op->type = RFI;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 150: /* isync */
op->type = BARRIER | BARRIER_ISYNC;
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 33: /* crnor */
case 129: /* crandc */
case 193: /* crxor */
case 225: /* crnand */
case 257: /* crand */
case 289: /* creqv */
case 417: /* crorc */
case 449: /* cror */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETCC;
ra = (word >> 16) & 0x1f;
rb = (word >> 11) & 0x1f;
rd = (word >> 21) & 0x1f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ra = (regs->ccr >> (31 - ra)) & 1;
rb = (regs->ccr >> (31 - rb)) & 1;
val = (word >> (6 + ra * 2 + rb)) & 1;
op->ccval = (regs->ccr & ~(1UL << (31 - rd))) |
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(val << (31 - rd));
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
break;
case 31:
switch ((word >> 1) & 0x3ff) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 598: /* sync */
op->type = BARRIER + BARRIER_SYNC;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
switch ((word >> 21) & 3) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 1: /* lwsync */
op->type = BARRIER + BARRIER_LWSYNC;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 2: /* ptesync */
op->type = BARRIER + BARRIER_PTESYNC;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
#endif
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 854: /* eieio */
op->type = BARRIER + BARRIER_EIEIO;
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
break;
}
rd = (word >> 21) & 0x1f;
ra = (word >> 16) & 0x1f;
rb = (word >> 11) & 0x1f;
rc = (word >> 6) & 0x1f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
switch (opcode) {
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 1:
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
goto unknown_opcode;
prefix_r = GET_PREFIX_R(word);
ra = GET_PREFIX_RA(suffix);
rd = (suffix >> 21) & 0x1f;
op->reg = rd;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd];
suffixopcode = get_op(suffix);
prefixtype = (word >> 24) & 0x3;
switch (prefixtype) {
case 2:
if (prefix_r && ra)
return 0;
switch (suffixopcode) {
case 14: /* paddi */
op->type = COMPUTE | PREFIXED;
op->val = mlsd_8lsd_ea(word, suffix, regs);
goto compute_done;
}
}
break;
case 2: /* tdi */
if (rd & trap_compare(regs->gpr[ra], (short) word))
goto trap;
return 1;
#endif
case 3: /* twi */
if (rd & trap_compare((int)regs->gpr[ra], (short) word))
goto trap;
return 1;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 4:
/*
* There are very many instructions with this primary opcode
* introduced in the ISA as early as v2.03. However, the ones
* we currently emulate were all introduced with ISA 3.0
*/
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
switch (word & 0x3f) {
case 48: /* maddhd */
asm volatile(PPC_MADDHD(%0, %1, %2, %3) :
"=r" (op->val) : "r" (regs->gpr[ra]),
"r" (regs->gpr[rb]), "r" (regs->gpr[rc]));
goto compute_done;
case 49: /* maddhdu */
asm volatile(PPC_MADDHDU(%0, %1, %2, %3) :
"=r" (op->val) : "r" (regs->gpr[ra]),
"r" (regs->gpr[rb]), "r" (regs->gpr[rc]));
goto compute_done;
case 51: /* maddld */
asm volatile(PPC_MADDLD(%0, %1, %2, %3) :
"=r" (op->val) : "r" (regs->gpr[ra]),
"r" (regs->gpr[rb]), "r" (regs->gpr[rc]));
goto compute_done;
}
/*
* There are other instructions from ISA 3.0 with the same
* primary opcode which do not have emulation support yet.
*/
goto unknown_opcode;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 7: /* mulli */
op->val = regs->gpr[ra] * (short) word;
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 8: /* subfic */
imm = (short) word;
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, ~regs->gpr[ra], imm, 1);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 10: /* cmpli */
imm = (unsigned short) word;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = regs->gpr[ra];
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if ((rd & 1) == 0)
val = (unsigned int) val;
#endif
do_cmp_unsigned(regs, op, val, imm, rd >> 2);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 11: /* cmpi */
imm = (short) word;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = regs->gpr[ra];
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if ((rd & 1) == 0)
val = (int) val;
#endif
do_cmp_signed(regs, op, val, imm, rd >> 2);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 12: /* addic */
imm = (short) word;
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra], imm, 0);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 13: /* addic. */
imm = (short) word;
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra], imm, 0);
set_cr0(regs, op);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 14: /* addi */
imm = (short) word;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (ra)
imm += regs->gpr[ra];
op->val = imm;
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 15: /* addis */
imm = ((short) word) << 16;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (ra)
imm += regs->gpr[ra];
op->val = imm;
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 19:
if (((word >> 1) & 0x1f) == 2) {
/* addpcis */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
imm = (short) (word & 0xffc1); /* d0 + d2 fields */
imm |= (word >> 15) & 0x3e; /* d1 field */
op->val = regs->nip + (imm << 16) + 4;
goto compute_done;
}
op->type = UNKNOWN;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 20: /* rlwimi */
mb = (word >> 6) & 0x1f;
me = (word >> 1) & 0x1f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = DATA32(regs->gpr[rd]);
imm = MASK32(mb, me);
op->val = (regs->gpr[ra] & ~imm) | (ROTATE(val, rb) & imm);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 21: /* rlwinm */
mb = (word >> 6) & 0x1f;
me = (word >> 1) & 0x1f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = DATA32(regs->gpr[rd]);
op->val = ROTATE(val, rb) & MASK32(mb, me);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 23: /* rlwnm */
mb = (word >> 6) & 0x1f;
me = (word >> 1) & 0x1f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
rb = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x1f;
val = DATA32(regs->gpr[rd]);
op->val = ROTATE(val, rb) & MASK32(mb, me);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 24: /* ori */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] | (unsigned short) word;
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 25: /* oris */
imm = (unsigned short) word;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] | (imm << 16);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 26: /* xori */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] ^ (unsigned short) word;
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 27: /* xoris */
imm = (unsigned short) word;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] ^ (imm << 16);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 28: /* andi. */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] & (unsigned short) word;
set_cr0(regs, op);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 29: /* andis. */
imm = (unsigned short) word;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] & (imm << 16);
set_cr0(regs, op);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 30: /* rld* */
mb = ((word >> 6) & 0x1f) | (word & 0x20);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = regs->gpr[rd];
if ((word & 0x10) == 0) {
sh = rb | ((word & 2) << 4);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
val = ROTATE(val, sh);
switch ((word >> 2) & 3) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 0: /* rldicl */
val &= MASK64_L(mb);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 1: /* rldicr */
val &= MASK64_R(mb);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 2: /* rldic */
val &= MASK64(mb, 63 - sh);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 3: /* rldimi */
imm = MASK64(mb, 63 - sh);
val = (regs->gpr[ra] & ~imm) |
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(val & imm);
}
op->val = val;
goto logical_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
} else {
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x3f;
val = ROTATE(val, sh);
switch ((word >> 1) & 7) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 0: /* rldcl */
op->val = val & MASK64_L(mb);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 1: /* rldcr */
op->val = val & MASK64_R(mb);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
}
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
op->type = UNKNOWN; /* illegal instruction */
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 31:
/* isel occupies 32 minor opcodes */
if (((word >> 1) & 0x1f) == 15) {
mb = (word >> 6) & 0x1f; /* bc field */
val = (regs->ccr >> (31 - mb)) & 1;
val2 = (ra) ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
op->val = (val) ? val2 : regs->gpr[rb];
goto compute_done;
}
switch ((word >> 1) & 0x3ff) {
case 4: /* tw */
if (rd == 0x1f ||
(rd & trap_compare((int)regs->gpr[ra],
(int)regs->gpr[rb])))
goto trap;
return 1;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 68: /* td */
if (rd & trap_compare(regs->gpr[ra], regs->gpr[rb]))
goto trap;
return 1;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 83: /* mfmsr */
if (regs->msr & MSR_PR)
goto priv;
op->type = MFMSR;
op->reg = rd;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 146: /* mtmsr */
if (regs->msr & MSR_PR)
goto priv;
op->type = MTMSR;
op->reg = rd;
op->val = 0xffffffff & ~(MSR_ME | MSR_LE);
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 178: /* mtmsrd */
if (regs->msr & MSR_PR)
goto priv;
op->type = MTMSR;
op->reg = rd;
/* only MSR_EE and MSR_RI get changed if bit 15 set */
/* mtmsrd doesn't change MSR_HV, MSR_ME or MSR_LE */
imm = (word & 0x10000)? 0x8002: 0xefffffffffffeffeUL;
op->val = imm;
return 0;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 19: /* mfcr */
imm = 0xffffffffUL;
if ((word >> 20) & 1) {
imm = 0xf0000000UL;
for (sh = 0; sh < 8; ++sh) {
if (word & (0x80000 >> sh))
break;
imm >>= 4;
}
}
op->val = regs->ccr & imm;
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 128: /* setb */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
/*
* 'ra' encodes the CR field number (bfa) in the top 3 bits.
* Since each CR field is 4 bits,
* we can simply mask off the bottom two bits (bfa * 4)
* to yield the first bit in the CR field.
*/
ra = ra & ~0x3;
/* 'val' stores bits of the CR field (bfa) */
val = regs->ccr >> (CR0_SHIFT - ra);
/* checks if the LT bit of CR field (bfa) is set */
if (val & 8)
op->val = -1;
/* checks if the GT bit of CR field (bfa) is set */
else if (val & 4)
op->val = 1;
else
op->val = 0;
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 144: /* mtcrf */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETCC;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
imm = 0xf0000000UL;
val = regs->gpr[rd];
op->ccval = regs->ccr;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
for (sh = 0; sh < 8; ++sh) {
if (word & (0x80000 >> sh))
op->ccval = (op->ccval & ~imm) |
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(val & imm);
imm >>= 4;
}
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 339: /* mfspr */
spr = ((word >> 16) & 0x1f) | ((word >> 6) & 0x3e0);
op->type = MFSPR;
op->reg = rd;
op->spr = spr;
if (spr == SPRN_XER || spr == SPRN_LR ||
spr == SPRN_CTR)
return 1;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 467: /* mtspr */
spr = ((word >> 16) & 0x1f) | ((word >> 6) & 0x3e0);
op->type = MTSPR;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd];
op->spr = spr;
if (spr == SPRN_XER || spr == SPRN_LR ||
spr == SPRN_CTR)
return 1;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Compare instructions
*/
case 0: /* cmp */
val = regs->gpr[ra];
val2 = regs->gpr[rb];
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if ((rd & 1) == 0) {
/* word (32-bit) compare */
val = (int) val;
val2 = (int) val2;
}
#endif
do_cmp_signed(regs, op, val, val2, rd >> 2);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 32: /* cmpl */
val = regs->gpr[ra];
val2 = regs->gpr[rb];
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if ((rd & 1) == 0) {
/* word (32-bit) compare */
val = (unsigned int) val;
val2 = (unsigned int) val2;
}
#endif
do_cmp_unsigned(regs, op, val, val2, rd >> 2);
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 508: /* cmpb */
do_cmpb(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], regs->gpr[rb]);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Arithmetic instructions
*/
case 8: /* subfc */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, ~regs->gpr[ra],
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->gpr[rb], 1);
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 9: /* mulhdu */
asm("mulhdu %0,%1,%2" : "=r" (op->val) :
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
"r" (regs->gpr[ra]), "r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 10: /* addc */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra],
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->gpr[rb], 0);
goto arith_done;
case 11: /* mulhwu */
asm("mulhwu %0,%1,%2" : "=r" (op->val) :
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
"r" (regs->gpr[ra]), "r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
case 40: /* subf */
op->val = regs->gpr[rb] - regs->gpr[ra];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 73: /* mulhd */
asm("mulhd %0,%1,%2" : "=r" (op->val) :
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
"r" (regs->gpr[ra]), "r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 75: /* mulhw */
asm("mulhw %0,%1,%2" : "=r" (op->val) :
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
"r" (regs->gpr[ra]), "r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
case 104: /* neg */
op->val = -regs->gpr[ra];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
case 136: /* subfe */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, ~regs->gpr[ra],
regs->gpr[rb], regs->xer & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
case 138: /* adde */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra],
regs->gpr[rb], regs->xer & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
case 200: /* subfze */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, ~regs->gpr[ra], 0L,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->xer & XER_CA);
goto arith_done;
case 202: /* addze */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra], 0L,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->xer & XER_CA);
goto arith_done;
case 232: /* subfme */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, ~regs->gpr[ra], -1L,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->xer & XER_CA);
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 233: /* mulld */
op->val = regs->gpr[ra] * regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 234: /* addme */
add_with_carry(regs, op, rd, regs->gpr[ra], -1L,
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
regs->xer & XER_CA);
goto arith_done;
case 235: /* mullw */
op->val = (long)(int) regs->gpr[ra] *
(int) regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 265: /* modud */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->val = regs->gpr[ra] % regs->gpr[rb];
goto compute_done;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 266: /* add */
op->val = regs->gpr[ra] + regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
case 267: /* moduw */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[ra] %
(unsigned int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 457: /* divdu */
op->val = regs->gpr[ra] / regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 459: /* divwu */
op->val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[ra] /
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(unsigned int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 489: /* divd */
op->val = (long int) regs->gpr[ra] /
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(long int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 491: /* divw */
op->val = (int) regs->gpr[ra] /
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
(int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto arith_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 425: /* divde[.] */
asm volatile(PPC_DIVDE(%0, %1, %2) :
"=r" (op->val) : "r" (regs->gpr[ra]),
"r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
case 393: /* divdeu[.] */
asm volatile(PPC_DIVDEU(%0, %1, %2) :
"=r" (op->val) : "r" (regs->gpr[ra]),
"r" (regs->gpr[rb]));
goto arith_done;
#endif
case 755: /* darn */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
switch (ra & 0x3) {
case 0:
/* 32-bit conditioned */
asm volatile(PPC_DARN(%0, 0) : "=r" (op->val));
goto compute_done;
case 1:
/* 64-bit conditioned */
asm volatile(PPC_DARN(%0, 1) : "=r" (op->val));
goto compute_done;
case 2:
/* 64-bit raw */
asm volatile(PPC_DARN(%0, 2) : "=r" (op->val));
goto compute_done;
}
goto unknown_opcode;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 777: /* modsd */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->val = (long int) regs->gpr[ra] %
(long int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto compute_done;
#endif
case 779: /* modsw */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->val = (int) regs->gpr[ra] %
(int) regs->gpr[rb];
goto compute_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Logical instructions
*/
case 26: /* cntlzw */
val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ( val ? __builtin_clz(val) : 32 );
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 58: /* cntlzd */
val = regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ( val ? __builtin_clzl(val) : 64 );
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#endif
case 28: /* and */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] & regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 60: /* andc */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] & ~regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 122: /* popcntb */
do_popcnt(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], 8);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 124: /* nor */
op->val = ~(regs->gpr[rd] | regs->gpr[rb]);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 154: /* prtyw */
do_prty(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], 32);
goto logical_done_nocc;
case 186: /* prtyd */
do_prty(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], 64);
goto logical_done_nocc;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
case 252: /* bpermd */
do_bpermd(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], regs->gpr[rb]);
goto logical_done_nocc;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 284: /* xor */
op->val = ~(regs->gpr[rd] ^ regs->gpr[rb]);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 316: /* xor */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] ^ regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 378: /* popcntw */
do_popcnt(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], 32);
goto logical_done_nocc;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 412: /* orc */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] | ~regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 444: /* or */
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] | regs->gpr[rb];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 476: /* nand */
op->val = ~(regs->gpr[rd] & regs->gpr[rb]);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
case 506: /* popcntd */
do_popcnt(regs, op, regs->gpr[rd], 64);
goto logical_done_nocc;
#endif
case 538: /* cnttzw */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = (val ? __builtin_ctz(val) : 32);
goto logical_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 570: /* cnttzd */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
val = regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = (val ? __builtin_ctzl(val) : 64);
goto logical_done;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 922: /* extsh */
op->val = (signed short) regs->gpr[rd];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 954: /* extsb */
op->val = (signed char) regs->gpr[rd];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 986: /* extsw */
op->val = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#endif
/*
* Shift instructions
*/
case 24: /* slw */
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x3f;
if (sh < 32)
op->val = (regs->gpr[rd] << sh) & 0xffffffffUL;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->val = 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 536: /* srw */
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x3f;
if (sh < 32)
op->val = (regs->gpr[rd] & 0xffffffffUL) >> sh;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->val = 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 792: /* sraw */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG + SETXER;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x3f;
ival = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ival >> (sh < 32 ? sh : 31);
op->xerval = regs->xer;
if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 32 || (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0))
op->xerval |= XER_CA;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA;
set_ca32(op, op->xerval & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 824: /* srawi */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG + SETXER;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
sh = rb;
ival = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ival >> sh;
op->xerval = regs->xer;
if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0)
op->xerval |= XER_CA;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA;
set_ca32(op, op->xerval & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 27: /* sld */
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x7f;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
if (sh < 64)
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] << sh;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->val = 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 539: /* srd */
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x7f;
if (sh < 64)
op->val = regs->gpr[rd] >> sh;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->val = 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 794: /* srad */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG + SETXER;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x7f;
ival = (signed long int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ival >> (sh < 64 ? sh : 63);
op->xerval = regs->xer;
if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 64 || (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0))
op->xerval |= XER_CA;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA;
set_ca32(op, op->xerval & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 826: /* sradi with sh_5 = 0 */
case 827: /* sradi with sh_5 = 1 */
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG + SETXER;
sh = rb | ((word & 2) << 4);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
ival = (signed long int) regs->gpr[rd];
op->val = ival >> sh;
op->xerval = regs->xer;
if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0)
op->xerval |= XER_CA;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
else
op->xerval &= ~XER_CA;
set_ca32(op, op->xerval & XER_CA);
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
goto logical_done;
case 890: /* extswsli with sh_5 = 0 */
case 891: /* extswsli with sh_5 = 1 */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG;
sh = rb | ((word & 2) << 4);
val = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
if (sh)
op->val = ROTATE(val, sh) & MASK64(0, 63 - sh);
else
op->val = val;
goto logical_done;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
/*
* Cache instructions
*/
case 54: /* dcbst */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, DCBST, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 86: /* dcbf */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, DCBF, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 246: /* dcbtst */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, DCBTST, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
op->reg = rd;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 278: /* dcbt */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, DCBTST, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
op->reg = rd;
return 0;
case 982: /* icbi */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, ICBI, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
return 0;
case 1014: /* dcbz */
op->type = MKOP(CACHEOP, DCBZ, 0);
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
return 0;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
break;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
/*
* Loads and stores.
*/
op->type = UNKNOWN;
op->update_reg = ra;
op->reg = rd;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd];
u = (word >> 20) & UPDATE;
op->vsx_flags = 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
switch (opcode) {
case 31:
u = word & UPDATE;
op->ea = xform_ea(word, regs);
switch ((word >> 1) & 0x3ff) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 20: /* lwarx */
op->type = MKOP(LARX, 0, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 150: /* stwcx. */
op->type = MKOP(STCX, 0, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 84: /* ldarx */
op->type = MKOP(LARX, 0, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 214: /* stdcx. */
op->type = MKOP(STCX, 0, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 52: /* lbarx */
op->type = MKOP(LARX, 0, 1);
break;
case 694: /* stbcx. */
op->type = MKOP(STCX, 0, 1);
break;
case 116: /* lharx */
op->type = MKOP(LARX, 0, 2);
break;
case 726: /* sthcx. */
op->type = MKOP(STCX, 0, 2);
break;
case 276: /* lqarx */
if (!((rd & 1) || rd == ra || rd == rb))
op->type = MKOP(LARX, 0, 16);
break;
case 182: /* stqcx. */
if (!(rd & 1))
op->type = MKOP(STCX, 0, 16);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
case 23: /* lwzx */
case 55: /* lwzux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 87: /* lbzx */
case 119: /* lbzux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 1);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
/*
* Note: for the load/store vector element instructions,
* bits of the EA say which field of the VMX register to use.
*/
case 7: /* lvebx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VMX, 0, 1);
op->element_size = 1;
break;
case 39: /* lvehx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VMX, 0, 2);
op->element_size = 2;
break;
case 71: /* lvewx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VMX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 4;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 103: /* lvx */
case 359: /* lvxl */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VMX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 135: /* stvebx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VMX, 0, 1);
op->element_size = 1;
break;
case 167: /* stvehx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VMX, 0, 2);
op->element_size = 2;
break;
case 199: /* stvewx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VMX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 4;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 231: /* stvx */
case 487: /* stvxl */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VMX, 0, 16);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 21: /* ldx */
case 53: /* ldux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 149: /* stdx */
case 181: /* stdux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
case 151: /* stwx */
case 183: /* stwux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 215: /* stbx */
case 247: /* stbux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 1);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 279: /* lhzx */
case 311: /* lhzux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 2);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 341: /* lwax */
case 373: /* lwaux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, SIGNEXT | u, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
case 343: /* lhax */
case 375: /* lhaux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, SIGNEXT | u, 2);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 407: /* sthx */
case 439: /* sthux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 2);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 532: /* ldbrx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, BYTEREV, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
case 533: /* lswx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_MULTI, 0, regs->xer & 0x7f);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 534: /* lwbrx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, BYTEREV, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 597: /* lswi */
if (rb == 0)
rb = 32; /* # bytes to load */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_MULTI, 0, rb);
op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 535: /* lfsx */
case 567: /* lfsux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, u | FPCONV, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 599: /* lfdx */
case 631: /* lfdux */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, u, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 663: /* stfsx */
case 695: /* stfsux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, u | FPCONV, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 727: /* stfdx */
case 759: /* stfdux */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, u, 8);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 791: /* lfdpx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, 0, 16);
break;
case 855: /* lfiwax */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, SIGNEXT, 4);
break;
case 887: /* lfiwzx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, 0, 4);
break;
case 919: /* stfdpx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, 0, 16);
break;
case 983: /* stfiwx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, 0, 4);
break;
#endif /* __powerpc64 */
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_FPU */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 660: /* stdbrx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, BYTEREV, 8);
op->val = byterev_8(regs->gpr[rd]);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif
case 661: /* stswx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_MULTI, 0, regs->xer & 0x7f);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 662: /* stwbrx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, BYTEREV, 4);
op->val = byterev_4(regs->gpr[rd]);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 725: /* stswi */
if (rb == 0)
rb = 32; /* # bytes to store */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_MULTI, 0, rb);
op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 790: /* lhbrx */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, BYTEREV, 2);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 918: /* sthbrx */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, BYTEREV, 2);
op->val = byterev_2(regs->gpr[rd]);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 12: /* lxsiwzx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 76: /* lxsiwax */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, SIGNEXT, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 140: /* stxsiwx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 268: /* lxvx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 269: /* lxvl */
case 301: { /* lxvll */
int nb;
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
nb = regs->gpr[rb] & 0xff;
if (nb > 16)
nb = 16;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, nb);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = ((word & 0x20) ? VSX_LDLEFT : 0) |
VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
}
case 332: /* lxvdsx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_SPLAT;
break;
case 333: /* lxvpx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 32);
op->element_size = 32;
break;
case 364: /* lxvwsx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 4;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_SPLAT | VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 396: /* stxvx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 397: /* stxvl */
case 429: { /* stxvll */
int nb;
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
nb = regs->gpr[rb] & 0xff;
if (nb > 16)
nb = 16;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, nb);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = ((word & 0x20) ? VSX_LDLEFT : 0) |
VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
}
case 461: /* stxvpx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 32);
op->element_size = 32;
break;
case 524: /* lxsspx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV;
break;
case 588: /* lxsdx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 652: /* stxsspx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV;
break;
case 716: /* stxsdx */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 780: /* lxvw4x */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 4;
break;
case 781: /* lxsibzx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 1);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 812: /* lxvh8x */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 2;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 813: /* lxsihzx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 2);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 844: /* lxvd2x */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 876: /* lxvb16x */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 1;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 908: /* stxvw4x */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 4;
break;
case 909: /* stxsibx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 1);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 940: /* stxvh8x */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 2;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 941: /* stxsihx */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 2);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 972: /* stxvd2x */
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 8;
break;
case 1004: /* stxvb16x */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 1;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
}
break;
case 32: /* lwz */
case 33: /* lwzu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 4);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 34: /* lbz */
case 35: /* lbzu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 1);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 36: /* stw */
case 37: /* stwu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 4);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 38: /* stb */
case 39: /* stbu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 1);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 40: /* lhz */
case 41: /* lhzu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, u, 2);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 42: /* lha */
case 43: /* lhau */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, SIGNEXT | u, 2);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 44: /* sth */
case 45: /* sthu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, u, 2);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 46: /* lmw */
if (ra >= rd)
break; /* invalid form, ra in range to load */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_MULTI, 0, 4 * (32 - rd));
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 47: /* stmw */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_MULTI, 0, 4 * (32 - rd));
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 48: /* lfs */
case 49: /* lfsu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, u | FPCONV, 4);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 50: /* lfd */
case 51: /* lfdu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, u, 8);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 52: /* stfs */
case 53: /* stfsu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, u | FPCONV, 4);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 54: /* stfd */
case 55: /* stfdu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, u, 8);
op->ea = dform_ea(word, regs);
break;
#endif
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 56: /* lq */
if (!((rd & 1) || (rd == ra)))
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, 0, 16);
op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 57: /* lfdp, lxsd, lxssp */
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
switch (word & 3) {
case 0: /* lfdp */
if (rd & 1)
break; /* reg must be even */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, 0, 16);
break;
case 2: /* lxsd */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 3: /* lxssp */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV | VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
}
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 58: /* ld[u], lwa */
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
switch (word & 3) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 0: /* ld */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, 0, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 1: /* ldu */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, UPDATE, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 2: /* lwa */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, SIGNEXT, 4);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 6:
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
op->reg = VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd);
op->element_size = 32;
switch (word & 0xf) {
case 0: /* lxvp */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 32);
break;
case 1: /* stxvp */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 32);
break;
}
break;
case 61: /* stfdp, lxv, stxsd, stxssp, stxv */
switch (word & 7) {
case 0: /* stfdp with LSB of DS field = 0 */
case 4: /* stfdp with LSB of DS field = 1 */
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, 0, 16);
break;
case 1: /* lxv */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
if (word & 8)
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 2: /* stxsd with LSB of DS field = 0 */
case 6: /* stxsd with LSB of DS field = 1 */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 3: /* stxssp with LSB of DS field = 0 */
case 7: /* stxssp with LSB of DS field = 1 */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV | VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 5: /* stxv */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
goto unknown_opcode;
op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
if (word & 8)
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
}
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#ifdef __powerpc64__
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 62: /* std[u] */
op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
switch (word & 3) {
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 0: /* std */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, 0, 8);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
case 1: /* stdu */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, UPDATE, 8);
break;
case 2: /* stq */
if (!(rd & 1))
op->type = MKOP(STORE, 0, 16);
break;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
}
break;
case 1: /* Prefixed instructions */
if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
goto unknown_opcode;
prefix_r = GET_PREFIX_R(word);
ra = GET_PREFIX_RA(suffix);
op->update_reg = ra;
rd = (suffix >> 21) & 0x1f;
op->reg = rd;
op->val = regs->gpr[rd];
suffixopcode = get_op(suffix);
prefixtype = (word >> 24) & 0x3;
switch (prefixtype) {
case 0: /* Type 00 Eight-Byte Load/Store */
if (prefix_r && ra)
break;
op->ea = mlsd_8lsd_ea(word, suffix, regs);
switch (suffixopcode) {
case 41: /* plwa */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED | SIGNEXT, 4);
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 42: /* plxsd */
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, PREFIXED, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 43: /* plxssp */
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, PREFIXED, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV | VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 46: /* pstxsd */
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, PREFIXED, 8);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 47: /* pstxssp */
op->reg = rd + 32;
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, PREFIXED, 4);
op->element_size = 8;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_FPCONV | VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 51: /* plxv1 */
op->reg += 32;
fallthrough;
case 50: /* plxv0 */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, PREFIXED, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
case 55: /* pstxv1 */
op->reg = rd + 32;
fallthrough;
case 54: /* pstxv0 */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, PREFIXED, 16);
op->element_size = 16;
op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
case 56: /* plq */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED, 16);
break;
case 57: /* pld */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED, 8);
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 58: /* plxvp */
op->reg = VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd);
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, PREFIXED, 32);
op->element_size = 32;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
case 60: /* pstq */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, PREFIXED, 16);
break;
case 61: /* pstd */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, PREFIXED, 8);
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case 62: /* pstxvp */
op->reg = VSX_REGISTER_XTP(rd);
op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, PREFIXED, 32);
op->element_size = 32;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
}
break;
case 1: /* Type 01 Eight-Byte Register-to-Register */
break;
case 2: /* Type 10 Modified Load/Store */
if (prefix_r && ra)
break;
op->ea = mlsd_8lsd_ea(word, suffix, regs);
switch (suffixopcode) {
case 32: /* plwz */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED, 4);
break;
case 34: /* plbz */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED, 1);
break;
case 36: /* pstw */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, PREFIXED, 4);
break;
case 38: /* pstb */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, PREFIXED, 1);
break;
case 40: /* plhz */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED, 2);
break;
case 42: /* plha */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD, PREFIXED | SIGNEXT, 2);
break;
case 44: /* psth */
op->type = MKOP(STORE, PREFIXED, 2);
break;
case 48: /* plfs */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, PREFIXED | FPCONV, 4);
break;
case 50: /* plfd */
op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, PREFIXED, 8);
break;
case 52: /* pstfs */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, PREFIXED | FPCONV, 4);
break;
case 54: /* pstfd */
op->type = MKOP(STORE_FP, PREFIXED, 8);
break;
}
break;
case 3: /* Type 11 Modified Register-to-Register */
break;
}
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
#endif /* __powerpc64__ */
}
powerpc/sstep: Fix load-store and update emulation The Power ISA says that the fixed-point load and update instructions must neither use R0 for the base address (RA) nor have the destination (RT) and the base address (RA) as the same register. Similarly, for fixed-point stores and floating-point loads and stores, the instruction is invalid when R0 is used as the base address (RA). This is applicable to the following instructions. * Load Byte and Zero with Update (lbzu) * Load Byte and Zero with Update Indexed (lbzux) * Load Halfword and Zero with Update (lhzu) * Load Halfword and Zero with Update Indexed (lhzux) * Load Halfword Algebraic with Update (lhau) * Load Halfword Algebraic with Update Indexed (lhaux) * Load Word and Zero with Update (lwzu) * Load Word and Zero with Update Indexed (lwzux) * Load Word Algebraic with Update Indexed (lwaux) * Load Doubleword with Update (ldu) * Load Doubleword with Update Indexed (ldux) * Load Floating Single with Update (lfsu) * Load Floating Single with Update Indexed (lfsux) * Load Floating Double with Update (lfdu) * Load Floating Double with Update Indexed (lfdux) * Store Byte with Update (stbu) * Store Byte with Update Indexed (stbux) * Store Halfword with Update (sthu) * Store Halfword with Update Indexed (sthux) * Store Word with Update (stwu) * Store Word with Update Indexed (stwux) * Store Doubleword with Update (stdu) * Store Doubleword with Update Indexed (stdux) * Store Floating Single with Update (stfsu) * Store Floating Single with Update Indexed (stfsux) * Store Floating Double with Update (stfdu) * Store Floating Double with Update Indexed (stfdux) E.g. the following behaviour is observed for an invalid load and update instruction having RA = RT. While a userspace program having an instruction word like 0xe9ce0001, i.e. ldu r14, 0(r14), runs without getting receiving a SIGILL on a Power system (observed on P8 and P9), the outcome of executing that instruction word varies and its behaviour can be considered to be undefined. Attaching an uprobe at that instruction's address results in emulation which currently performs the load as well as writes the effective address back to the base register. This might not match the outcome from hardware. To remove any inconsistencies, this adds additional checks for the aforementioned instructions to make sure that the emulation infrastructure treats them as unknown. The kernel can then fallback to executing such instructions on hardware. Fixes: 0016a4cf5582 ("powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step()") Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204080744.135785-1-sandipan@linux.ibm.com
2021-02-04 08:07:43 +00:00
if (OP_IS_LOAD_STORE(op->type) && (op->type & UPDATE)) {
switch (GETTYPE(op->type)) {
case LOAD:
if (ra == rd)
goto unknown_opcode;
fallthrough;
case STORE:
case LOAD_FP:
case STORE_FP:
if (ra == 0)
goto unknown_opcode;
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
if ((GETTYPE(op->type) == LOAD_VSX ||
GETTYPE(op->type) == STORE_VSX) &&
!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX)) {
return -1;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_VSX */
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
unknown_opcode:
op->type = UNKNOWN;
return 0;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
logical_done:
if (word & 1)
set_cr0(regs, op);
logical_done_nocc:
op->reg = ra;
op->type |= SETREG;
return 1;
powerpc: Emulate most Book I instructions in emulate_step() This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx., so this handles the Altivec/VMX lvx and stvx and the VSX lxv2dx and stxv2dx instructions (implemented in POWER7). The new code can emulate user mode instructions, and checks the effective address for a load or store if the saved state is for user mode. It doesn't handle little-endian mode at present. For floating-point, Altivec/VMX and VSX instructions, it checks that the saved MSR has the enable bit for the relevant facility set, and if so, assumes that the FP/VMX/VSX registers contain valid state, and does loads or stores directly to/from the FP/VMX/VSX registers, using assembly helpers in ldstfp.S. Instructions supported now include: * Loads and stores, including some but not all VMX and VSX instructions, and lmw/stmw * Atomic loads and stores (l[dw]arx, st[dw]cx.) * Arithmetic instructions (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc.) * Compare instructions * Rotate and mask instructions * Shift instructions * Logical instructions (and, or, xor, etc.) * Condition register logical instructions * mtcrf, cntlz[wd], exts[bhw] * isync, sync, lwsync, ptesync, eieio * Cache operations (dcbf, dcbst, dcbt, dcbtst) The overflow-checking arithmetic instructions are not included, but they appear not to be ever used in C code. This uses decimal values for the minor opcodes in the switch statements because that is what appears in the Power ISA specification, thus it is easier to check that they are correct if they are in decimal. If this is used to single-step an instruction where a data breakpoint interrupt occurred, then there is the possibility that the instruction is a lwarx or ldarx. In that case we have to be careful not to lose the reservation until we get to the matching st[wd]cx., or we'll never make forward progress. One alternative is to try to arrange that we can return from interrupts and handle data breakpoint interrupts without losing the reservation, which means not using any spinlocks, mutexes, or atomic ops (including bitops). That seems rather fragile. The other alternative is to emulate the larx/stcx and all the instructions in between. This is why this commit adds support for a wide range of integer instructions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2010-06-15 04:48:58 +00:00
arith_done:
if (word & 1)
set_cr0(regs, op);
compute_done:
op->reg = rd;
op->type |= SETREG;
return 1;
priv:
op->type = INTERRUPT | 0x700;
op->val = SRR1_PROGPRIV;
return 0;
trap:
op->type = INTERRUPT | 0x700;
op->val = SRR1_PROGTRAP;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analyse_instr);
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(analyse_instr);
/*
* For PPC32 we always use stwu with r1 to change the stack pointer.
* So this emulated store may corrupt the exception frame, now we
* have to provide the exception frame trampoline, which is pushed
* below the kprobed function stack. So we only update gpr[1] but
* don't emulate the real store operation. We will do real store
* operation safely in exception return code by checking this flag.
*/
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline int handle_stack_update(unsigned long ea, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* Check if we already set since that means we'll
* lose the previous value.
*/
WARN_ON(test_thread_flag(TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE));
set_thread_flag(TIF_EMULATE_STACK_STORE);
return 0;
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline void do_signext(unsigned long *valp, int size)
{
switch (size) {
case 2:
*valp = (signed short) *valp;
break;
case 4:
*valp = (signed int) *valp;
break;
}
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
static nokprobe_inline void do_byterev(unsigned long *valp, int size)
{
switch (size) {
case 2:
*valp = byterev_2(*valp);
break;
case 4:
*valp = byterev_4(*valp);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
*valp = byterev_8(*valp);
break;
#endif
}
}
/*
* Emulate an instruction that can be executed just by updating
* fields in *regs.
*/
void emulate_update_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct instruction_op *op)
{
unsigned long next_pc;
next_pc = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, regs->nip + GETLENGTH(op->type));
switch (GETTYPE(op->type)) {
case COMPUTE:
if (op->type & SETREG)
regs->gpr[op->reg] = op->val;
if (op->type & SETCC)
regs->ccr = op->ccval;
if (op->type & SETXER)
regs->xer = op->xerval;
break;
case BRANCH:
if (op->type & SETLK)
regs->link = next_pc;
if (op->type & BRTAKEN)
next_pc = op->val;
if (op->type & DECCTR)
--regs->ctr;
break;
case BARRIER:
switch (op->type & BARRIER_MASK) {
case BARRIER_SYNC:
mb();
break;
case BARRIER_ISYNC:
isync();
break;
case BARRIER_EIEIO:
eieio();
break;
case BARRIER_LWSYNC:
asm volatile("lwsync" : : : "memory");
break;
case BARRIER_PTESYNC:
asm volatile("ptesync" : : : "memory");
break;
}
break;
case MFSPR:
switch (op->spr) {
case SPRN_XER:
regs->gpr[op->reg] = regs->xer & 0xffffffffUL;
break;
case SPRN_LR:
regs->gpr[op->reg] = regs->link;
break;
case SPRN_CTR:
regs->gpr[op->reg] = regs->ctr;
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
break;
case MTSPR:
switch (op->spr) {
case SPRN_XER:
regs->xer = op->val & 0xffffffffUL;
break;
case SPRN_LR:
regs->link = op->val;
break;
case SPRN_CTR:
regs->ctr = op->val;
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
regs_set_return_ip(regs, next_pc);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_update_regs);
/*
* Emulate a previously-analysed load or store instruction.
* Return values are:
* 0 = instruction emulated successfully
* -EFAULT = address out of range or access faulted (regs->dar
* contains the faulting address)
* -EACCES = misaligned access, instruction requires alignment
* -EINVAL = unknown operation in *op
*/
int emulate_loadstore(struct pt_regs *regs, struct instruction_op *op)
{
int err, size, type;
int i, rd, nb;
unsigned int cr;
unsigned long val;
unsigned long ea;
bool cross_endian;
err = 0;
size = GETSIZE(op->type);
type = GETTYPE(op->type);
cross_endian = (regs->msr & MSR_LE) != (MSR_KERNEL & MSR_LE);
ea = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, op->ea);
switch (type) {
case LARX:
if (ea & (size - 1))
return -EACCES; /* can't handle misaligned */
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
err = 0;
val = 0;
switch (size) {
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 1:
__get_user_asmx(val, ea, err, "lbarx");
break;
case 2:
__get_user_asmx(val, ea, err, "lharx");
break;
#endif
case 4:
__get_user_asmx(val, ea, err, "lwarx");
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
__get_user_asmx(val, ea, err, "ldarx");
break;
case 16:
err = do_lqarx(ea, &regs->gpr[op->reg]);
break;
#endif
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
if (err) {
regs->dar = ea;
break;
}
if (size < 16)
regs->gpr[op->reg] = val;
break;
case STCX:
if (ea & (size - 1))
return -EACCES; /* can't handle misaligned */
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
err = 0;
switch (size) {
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 1:
__put_user_asmx(op->val, ea, err, "stbcx.", cr);
break;
case 2:
__put_user_asmx(op->val, ea, err, "stbcx.", cr);
break;
#endif
case 4:
__put_user_asmx(op->val, ea, err, "stwcx.", cr);
break;
#ifdef __powerpc64__
case 8:
__put_user_asmx(op->val, ea, err, "stdcx.", cr);
break;
case 16:
err = do_stqcx(ea, regs->gpr[op->reg],
regs->gpr[op->reg + 1], &cr);
break;
#endif
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
if (!err)
regs->ccr = (regs->ccr & 0x0fffffff) |
(cr & 0xe0000000) |
((regs->xer >> 3) & 0x10000000);
else
regs->dar = ea;
break;
case LOAD:
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if (size == 16) {
err = emulate_lq(regs, ea, op->reg, cross_endian);
break;
}
#endif
err = read_mem(&regs->gpr[op->reg], ea, size, regs);
if (!err) {
if (op->type & SIGNEXT)
do_signext(&regs->gpr[op->reg], size);
if ((op->type & BYTEREV) == (cross_endian ? 0 : BYTEREV))
do_byterev(&regs->gpr[op->reg], size);
}
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
case LOAD_FP:
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
/*
* If the instruction is in userspace, we can emulate it even
* if the VMX state is not live, because we have the state
* stored in the thread_struct. If the instruction is in
* the kernel, we must not touch the state in the thread_struct.
*/
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & MSR_FP))
return 0;
err = do_fp_load(op, ea, regs, cross_endian);
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
case LOAD_VMX:
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & MSR_VEC))
return 0;
err = do_vec_load(op->reg, ea, size, regs, cross_endian);
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case LOAD_VSX: {
unsigned long msrbit = MSR_VSX;
/*
* Some VSX instructions check the MSR_VEC bit rather than MSR_VSX
* when the target of the instruction is a vector register.
*/
if (op->reg >= 32 && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_CHECK_VEC))
msrbit = MSR_VEC;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & msrbit))
return 0;
err = do_vsx_load(op, ea, regs, cross_endian);
break;
}
#endif
case LOAD_MULTI:
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
rd = op->reg;
for (i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
unsigned int v32 = 0;
nb = size - i;
if (nb > 4)
nb = 4;
err = copy_mem_in((u8 *) &v32, ea, nb, regs);
if (err)
break;
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
v32 = byterev_4(v32);
regs->gpr[rd] = v32;
ea += 4;
/* reg number wraps from 31 to 0 for lsw[ix] */
rd = (rd + 1) & 0x1f;
}
break;
case STORE:
#ifdef __powerpc64__
if (size == 16) {
err = emulate_stq(regs, ea, op->reg, cross_endian);
break;
}
#endif
if ((op->type & UPDATE) && size == sizeof(long) &&
op->reg == 1 && op->update_reg == 1 &&
!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) &&
ea >= regs->gpr[1] - STACK_INT_FRAME_SIZE) {
err = handle_stack_update(ea, regs);
break;
}
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
do_byterev(&op->val, size);
err = write_mem(op->val, ea, size, regs);
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
case STORE_FP:
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & MSR_FP))
return 0;
err = do_fp_store(op, ea, regs, cross_endian);
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
case STORE_VMX:
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & MSR_VEC))
return 0;
err = do_vec_store(op->reg, ea, size, regs, cross_endian);
break;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_VSX
case STORE_VSX: {
unsigned long msrbit = MSR_VSX;
/*
* Some VSX instructions check the MSR_VEC bit rather than MSR_VSX
* when the target of the instruction is a vector register.
*/
if (op->reg >= 32 && (op->vsx_flags & VSX_CHECK_VEC))
msrbit = MSR_VEC;
powerpc: Emulate FP/vector/VSX loads/stores correctly when regs not live At present, the analyse_instr/emulate_step code checks for the relevant MSR_FP/VEC/VSX bit being set when a FP/VMX/VSX load or store is decoded, but doesn't recheck the bit before reading or writing the relevant FP/VMX/VSX register in emulate_step(). Since we don't have preemption disabled, it is possible that we get preempted between checking the MSR bit and doing the register access. If that happened, then the registers would have been saved to the thread_struct for the current process. Accesses to the CPU registers would then potentially read stale values, or write values that would never be seen by the user process. Another way that the registers can become non-live is if a page fault occurs when accessing user memory, and the page fault code calls a copy routine that wants to use the VMX or VSX registers. To fix this, the code for all the FP/VMX/VSX loads gets restructured so that it forms an image in a local variable of the desired register contents, then disables preemption, checks the MSR bit and either sets the CPU register or writes the value to the thread struct. Similarly, the code for stores checks the MSR bit, copies either the CPU register or the thread struct to a local variable, then reenables preemption and then copies the register image to memory. If the instruction being emulated is in the kernel, then we must not use the register values in the thread_struct. In this case, if the relevant MSR enable bit is not set, then emulate_step refuses to emulate the instruction. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-30 04:12:33 +00:00
if (!(regs->msr & MSR_PR) && !(regs->msr & msrbit))
return 0;
err = do_vsx_store(op, ea, regs, cross_endian);
break;
}
#endif
case STORE_MULTI:
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, size))
return -EFAULT;
rd = op->reg;
for (i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
unsigned int v32 = regs->gpr[rd];
nb = size - i;
if (nb > 4)
nb = 4;
if (unlikely(cross_endian))
v32 = byterev_4(v32);
err = copy_mem_out((u8 *) &v32, ea, nb, regs);
if (err)
break;
ea += 4;
/* reg number wraps from 31 to 0 for stsw[ix] */
rd = (rd + 1) & 0x1f;
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
if (err)
return err;
if (op->type & UPDATE)
regs->gpr[op->update_reg] = op->ea;
return 0;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_loadstore);
/*
* Emulate instructions that cause a transfer of control,
* loads and stores, and a few other instructions.
* Returns 1 if the step was emulated, 0 if not,
* or -1 if the instruction is one that should not be stepped,
* such as an rfid, or a mtmsrd that would clear MSR_RI.
*/
int emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst instr)
{
struct instruction_op op;
int r, err, type;
unsigned long val;
unsigned long ea;
r = analyse_instr(&op, regs, instr);
if (r < 0)
return r;
if (r > 0) {
emulate_update_regs(regs, &op);
return 1;
}
err = 0;
type = GETTYPE(op.type);
if (OP_IS_LOAD_STORE(type)) {
err = emulate_loadstore(regs, &op);
if (err)
return 0;
goto instr_done;
}
switch (type) {
case CACHEOP:
ea = truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, op.ea);
if (!address_ok(regs, ea, 8))
return 0;
switch (op.type & CACHEOP_MASK) {
case DCBST:
__cacheop_user_asmx(ea, err, "dcbst");
break;
case DCBF:
__cacheop_user_asmx(ea, err, "dcbf");
break;
case DCBTST:
if (op.reg == 0)
prefetchw((void *) ea);
break;
case DCBT:
if (op.reg == 0)
prefetch((void *) ea);
break;
case ICBI:
__cacheop_user_asmx(ea, err, "icbi");
break;
case DCBZ:
err = emulate_dcbz(ea, regs);
break;
}
if (err) {
regs->dar = ea;
return 0;
}
goto instr_done;
case MFMSR:
regs->gpr[op.reg] = regs->msr & MSR_MASK;
goto instr_done;
case MTMSR:
val = regs->gpr[op.reg];
if ((val & MSR_RI) == 0)
/* can't step mtmsr[d] that would clear MSR_RI */
return -1;
/* here op.val is the mask of bits to change */
regs_set_return_msr(regs, (regs->msr & ~op.val) | (val & op.val));
goto instr_done;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
case SYSCALL: /* sc */
/*
* N.B. this uses knowledge about how the syscall
* entry code works. If that is changed, this will
* need to be changed also.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_FAST_ENDIAN_SWITCH) &&
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_REAL_LE) &&
regs->gpr[0] == 0x1ebe) {
regs_set_return_msr(regs, regs->msr ^ MSR_LE);
goto instr_done;
}
regs->gpr[9] = regs->gpr[13];
regs->gpr[10] = MSR_KERNEL;
regs->gpr[11] = regs->nip + 4;
regs->gpr[12] = regs->msr & MSR_MASK;
regs->gpr[13] = (unsigned long) get_paca();
regs_set_return_ip(regs, (unsigned long) &system_call_common);
regs_set_return_msr(regs, MSR_KERNEL);
return 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
case SYSCALL_VECTORED_0: /* scv 0 */
regs->gpr[9] = regs->gpr[13];
regs->gpr[10] = MSR_KERNEL;
regs->gpr[11] = regs->nip + 4;
regs->gpr[12] = regs->msr & MSR_MASK;
regs->gpr[13] = (unsigned long) get_paca();
regs_set_return_ip(regs, (unsigned long) &system_call_vectored_emulate);
regs_set_return_msr(regs, MSR_KERNEL);
return 1;
#endif
case RFI:
return -1;
#endif
}
return 0;
instr_done:
regs_set_return_ip(regs,
truncate_if_32bit(regs->msr, regs->nip + GETLENGTH(op.type)));
return 1;
}
powerpc/kprobes: Convert __kprobes to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() Along similar lines as commit 9326638cbee2 ("kprobes, x86: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation"), convert __kprobes annotation to either NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() or nokprobe_inline. The latter forces inlining, in which case the caller needs to be added to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(). Also: - blacklist arch_deref_entry_point(), and - convert a few regular inlines to nokprobe_inline in lib/sstep.c A key benefit is the ability to detect such symbols as being blacklisted. Before this patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem $ perf probe read_mem Failed to write event: Invalid argument Error: Failed to add events. $ dmesg | tail -1 [ 3736.112815] Could not insert probe at _text+10014968: -22 After patch: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/blacklist | grep read_mem 0xc000000000072b50-0xc000000000072d20 read_mem $ perf probe read_mem read_mem is blacklisted function, skip it. Added new events: (null):(null) (on read_mem) probe:read_mem (on read_mem) You can now use it in all perf tools, such as: perf record -e probe:read_mem -aR sleep 1 $ grep " read_mem" /proc/kallsyms c000000000072b50 t read_mem c0000000005f3b40 t read_mem $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list c0000000005f3b48 k read_mem+0x8 [DISABLED] Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Minor change log formatting, fix up some conflicts] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-04-12 11:18:51 +00:00
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(emulate_step);