Prepare for using this struct member to do a proper reprogramming and
deletion accounting so that stale signals can be dropped.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.611997737@linutronix.de
No point in delivering a signal from the past. POSIX does not specify the
behaviour here:
- "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
notifications is unspecified."
- "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is unspecified."
In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
been disarmed.
Drop the signal as that is conistent and understandable behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.553646280@linutronix.de
In case that a timer was reprogrammed or deleted an already pending signal
is obsolete. Right now such signals are kept around and eventually
delivered. While POSIX is blury about this:
- "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
notifications is unspecified."
- "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
unspecified."
it is reasonable in both cases to expect that pending signals are discarded
as they have no meaning anymore.
Prepare the signal code to allow dropping posix timer signals.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.494416923@linutronix.de
The si_sys_private member of the siginfo which is embedded in the
preallocated sigqueue is used by the posix timer code to decide whether a
timer must be reprogrammed on signal delivery.
The handling of this is racy as a long standing comment in that code
documents. It is modified with the timer lock held, but without sighand
lock being held. The actual signal delivery code checks for it under
sighand lock without holding the timer lock.
Hand the new value to send_sigqueue() as argument and store it with sighand
lock held. This is an intermediate change to address this issue.
The arguments to this function will be cleanup in subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.434338954@linutronix.de
Move the itimer rearming out of the signal code and consolidate all posix
timer related functions in the signal code under one ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.314100569@linutronix.de
The details about the handling of the "normal" values were moved
to the _msecs_to_jiffies() helpers in commit ca42aaf0c8 ("time:
Refactor msecs_to_jiffies"). However, the same commit still mentioned
__msecs_to_jiffies() in the added documentation.
Thus point to _msecs_to_jiffies() instead.
Fixes: ca42aaf0c8 ("time: Refactor msecs_to_jiffies")
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025110141.157205-2-ojeda@kernel.org
The documentation's intention is to compare msecs_to_jiffies() (first
sentence) with __msecs_to_jiffies() (second sentence), which is what the
original documentation did. One of the cleanups in commit f3cb80804b
("time: Fix various kernel-doc problems") may have thought the paragraph
was talking about the latter since that is what it is being documented.
Thus revert that part of the change.
Fixes: f3cb80804b ("time: Fix various kernel-doc problems")
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025110141.157205-1-ojeda@kernel.org
All call sites of using TK_MIRROR flag in timekeeping_update() are
gone. The TK_MIRROR dependent code path is therefore dead code.
Remove it along with the TK_MIRROR define.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-24-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert do_adjtimex() to use this scheme and take the opportunity to use a
scoped_guard() for locking.
That requires to have a separate function for updating the leap state so
that the update is protected by the sequence count. This also brings the
timekeeper and the shadow timekeeper in sync for this state, which was not
the case so far. That's not a correctness problem as the state is only used
at the read sides which use the real timekeeper, but it's inconsistent
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-23-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declarations while at it.
As halt_fast_timekeeper() does not need protection sequence counter, it is
no problem to move it with this change outside of the sequence counter
protected area. But it still needs to be executed while holding the lock.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-22-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declaration while at it.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-21-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use this scheme.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-20-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
For timekeeping_init() the sequence count write held time is not relevant
and it could keep working on the real timekeeper, but there is no reason to
make it different from other timekeeper updates.
Convert it to operate on the shadow timekeeper.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-19-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert change_clocksource() to use this scheme.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-18-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme.
That allows to use a scoped_guard() for locking the timekeeper lock as the
usage of the shadow timekeeper allows a rollback in the error case instead
of the full timekeeper update of the original code.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-17-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert do_settimeofday64() to use this scheme.
That allows to use a scoped_guard() for locking the timekeeper lock as the
usage of the shadow timekeeper allows a rollback in the error case instead
of the full timekeeper update of the original code.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-16-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Functions which operate on the real timekeeper, e.g. do_settimeofday(),
have error conditions. If they are hit a full timekeeping update is still
required because the already committed operations modified the timekeeper.
When switching these functions to operate on the shadow timekeeper then the
full update can be avoided in the error case, but the modified shadow
timekeeper has to be restored.
Provide a helper function for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-15-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
timekeeping_advance() is the only optimized function which uses
shadow_timekeeper for updating the real timekeeper to keep the sequence
counter protected region as small as possible.
To be able to transform timekeeper updates in other functions to use the
same logic, split out functionality into a separate function
timekeeper_update_staged().
While at it, document the reason why the sequence counter must be write
held over the call to timekeeping_update() and the copying to the real
timekeeper and why using a pointer based update is suboptimal.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-13-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Updates of the timekeeper are done in two ways:
1. Updating timekeeper and afterwards memcpy()'ing the result into
shadow_timekeeper using timekeeping_update(). Used everywhere for
updates except in timekeeping_advance(); the sequence counter protected
region starts before the first change to the timekeeper is done.
2. Updating shadow_timekeeper and then memcpy()'ing the result into
timekeeper. Used only by in timekeeping_advance(); The seqence counter
protected region is only around timekeeping_update() and the memcpy for
copy from shadow to timekeeper.
The second option is fast path optimized. The sequence counter protected
region is as short as possible.
As this behaviour is mainly documented by commit messages, but not in code,
it makes the not easy timekeeping code more complicated to read.
There is no reason why updates to the timekeeper can't use the optimized
version everywhere. With this, the code will be cleaner, as code is reused
instead of duplicated.
To be able to access tk_data which contains all required information, add a
pointer to tk_data as an argument to timekeeping_update(). With that
convert the comment about holding the lock into a lockdep assert.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-12-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
The struct tk_core uses is not reusable. As long as there is only a single
timekeeper, this is not a problem. But when the timekeeper infrastructure
will be reused for per ptp clock timekeepers, an explicit struct type is
required.
Define struct tk_data as explicit struct type for tk_core.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-10-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
timekeeper_lock protects updates to struct tk_core but is not part of
struct tk_core. As long as there is only a single timekeeper, this is not a
problem. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, timekeeper_lock needs to be part of tk_core.
Move the lock into tk_core, move initialisation of the lock and sequence
counter into timekeeping_init() and update all users of timekeeper_lock.
As this is touching all lock sites, convert them to use:
guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&tk_core.lock);
instead of lock/unlock functions whenever possible.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-9-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
timekeeper_lock protects updates of timekeeper (tk_core). It is also used
by vdso_update_begin/end() and not only internally by the timekeeper code.
As long as there is only a single timekeeper, this works fine. But when
the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp clock timekeepers,
timekeeper_lock needs to be part of tk_core..
Therefore encapuslate locking/unlocking of timekeeper_lock and make the
lock static.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-8-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
tk_core requires shadow_timekeeper to allow timekeeping_advance() updating
without holding the timekeeper sequence count write locked. This allows the
readers to make progress up to the actual update where the shadow
timekeeper is copied over to the real timekeeper.
As long as there is only a single timekeeper, having them separate is
fine. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, shadow_timekeeper needs to be part of tk_core.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-7-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
timekeeping_advance() takes the timekeeper_lock and releases it before
returning. When an early return is required, goto statements are used to
make sure the lock is realeased properly. When the code was written the
locking guard() was not yet available.
Use the guard() to simplify the code and while at it cleanup ordering of
function variables. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-5-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
There is no point to go through a full timekeeping update when acquiring a
module reference or enabling the new clocksource fails.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-4-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
do_adjtimex() invokes tk_update_leap_state() unconditionally even when a
previous invocation of timekeeping_update() already did that update.
Put it into the else path which is invoked when timekeeping_update() is not
called.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-3-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
hard_pps() update does not modify anything which might be required by time
readers so forcing readers out of the way during the update is a pointless
exercise.
The interaction with adjtimex() and timekeeper updates which call into the
NTP code is properly serialized by timekeeper_lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-2-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
Since SLOB was removed and since commit 6c6c47b063 ("mm, slab: call
kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy()"), it is not longer
necessary to use call_rcu() when the callback only performs
kmem_cache_free(). Use kfree_rcu() directly.
The changes were made using Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241013201704.49576-12-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
There is a warning in checkpatch script that triggers, when min and max
arguments of usleep_range_state() are in reverse order. This check does
only cover callsites which uses constants. Add this check into the code as
a WARN_ON_ONCE() to also cover callsites not using constants and fix the
mis-usage by resetting the delta to 0.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-9-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
A lot of commonly used functions for inserting a sleep or delay lack a
proper function description. Add function descriptions to all of them to
have important information in a central place close to the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-5-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
schedule_timeout*() functions do not have proper kernel-doc formatted
function descriptions. schedule_hrtimeout() and schedule_hrtimeout_range()
have a almost identical description.
Add missing function descriptions. Remove copy of function description and
add a pointer to the existing description instead.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-3-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
All schedule_timeout() and *sleep*() related functions are interfaces on
top of timer list timers and hrtimers to add a sleep to the code. As they
are built on top of the timer list timers and hrtimers, the [hr]timer
interfaces are already used except when queuing the timer in
schedule_timeout(). But there exists the appropriate interface add_timer()
which does the same job with an extra check for an already pending timer.
Split all those functions as they are into a separate file and use
add_timer() instead of __mod_timer() in schedule_timeout().
While at it fix minor formatting issues and a multi line printk function
call in schedule_timeout().
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-2-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
clocksource_change_rating() has been unused since 2017's commit
63ed4e0c67 ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Consolidate all Hyper-V specific clocksource code")
Remove it.
__clocksource_change_rating now only has one use which is ifdef'd.
Move it into the ifdef'd section.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010135446.213098-1-linux@treblig.org
The mgtime_floor value is a global variable for tracking the latest
fine-grained timestamp handed out. Because it's a global, track the
number of times that a new floor value is assigned.
Add a new percpu counter to the timekeeping code to track the number of
floor swap events that have occurred. A later patch will add a debugfs
file to display this counter alongside other stats involving multigrain
timestamps.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # documentation bits
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241002-mgtime-v10-2-d1c4717f5284@kernel.org
Multigrain timestamps allow the kernel to use fine-grained timestamps when
an inode's attributes is being actively observed via ->getattr(). With
this support, it's possible for a file to get a fine-grained timestamp, and
another modified after it to get a coarse-grained stamp that is earlier
than the fine-grained time. If this happens then the files can appear to
have been modified in reverse order, which breaks VFS ordering guarantees
[1].
To prevent this, maintain a floor value for multigrain timestamps.
Whenever a fine-grained timestamp is handed out, record it, and when later
coarse-grained stamps are handed out, ensure they are not earlier than that
value. If the coarse-grained timestamp is earlier than the fine-grained
floor, return the floor value instead.
Add a static singleton atomic64_t into timekeeper.c that is used to keep
track of the latest fine-grained time ever handed out. This is tracked as a
monotonic ktime_t value to ensure that it isn't affected by clock
jumps. Because it is updated at different times than the rest of the
timekeeper object, the floor value is managed independently of the
timekeeper via a cmpxchg() operation, and sits on its own cacheline.
Add two new public interfaces:
- ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64_mg() fills a timespec64 with the later of the
coarse-grained clock and the floor time
- ktime_get_real_ts64_mg() gets the fine-grained clock value, and tries
to swap it into the floor. A timespec64 is filled with the result.
The floor value is global and updated via a single try_cmpxchg(). If
that fails then the operation raced with a concurrent update. Any
concurrent update must be later than the existing floor value, so any
racing tasks can accept any resulting floor value without retrying.
[1]: POSIX requires that files be stamped with realtime clock values, and
makes no provision for dealing with backward clock jumps. If a backward
realtime clock jump occurs, then files can appear to have been modified
in reverse order.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # documentation bits
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241002-mgtime-v10-1-d1c4717f5284@kernel.org
ktime_mono_to_any() only fetches the offset inside the loop. This is a
single word on 64-bit CPUs, and seqcount_read_begin() implies a full SMP
barrier.
Use READ_ONCE() to fetch the offset instead of doing a seqcount loop on
64-bit and add the matching WRITE_ONCE()'s to update the offsets in
tk_set_wall_to_mono() and tk_update_sleep_time().
[ tglx: Get rid of the #ifdeffery ]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910-mgtime-v3-1-84406ed53fad@kernel.org
For tracing purpose, the boot clock is interesting as it doesn't stop on
suspend. Export it as part of the time snapshot. This will later allow
the hypervisor to add boot clock timestamps to its events.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240911093029.3279154-5-vdonnefort@google.com
