The most common use that s_error_work will get scheduled is now the
periodic update of the superblock. So rename it to s_sb_upd_work.
Also rename the function flush_stashed_error_work() to
update_super_work().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch introduces a mechanism to periodically check and update
the superblock within the ext4 file system. The main purpose of this
patch is to keep the disk superblock up to date. The update will be
performed if more than one hour has passed since the last update, and
if more than 16MB of data have been written to disk.
This check and update is performed within the ext4_journal_commit_callback
function, ensuring that the superblock is written while the disk is
active, rather than based on a timer that may trigger during disk idle
periods.
Discussion https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg85865.html
Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Kuznetsov <vk.en.mail@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810143852.40228-1-vk.en.mail@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The commit referenced below opened up concurrent unaligned dio under
shared locking for pure overwrites. In doing so, it enabled use of
the IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY flag and added a warning on unexpected
-EAGAIN returns as an extra precaution, since ext4 does not retry
writes in such cases. The flag itself is advisory in this case since
ext4 checks for unaligned I/Os and uses appropriate locking up
front, rather than on a retry in response to -EAGAIN.
As it turns out, the warning check is susceptible to false positives
because there are scenarios where -EAGAIN can be expected from lower
layers without necessarily having IOCB_NOWAIT set on the iocb. For
example, one instance of the warning has been seen where io_uring
sets IOCB_HIPRI, which in turn results in REQ_POLLED|REQ_NOWAIT on
the bio. This results in -EAGAIN if the block layer is unable to
allocate a request, etc. [Note that there is an outstanding patch to
untangle REQ_POLLED and REQ_NOWAIT such that the latter relies on
IOCB_NOWAIT, which would also address this instance of the warning.]
Another instance of the warning has been reproduced by syzbot. A dio
write is interrupted down in __get_user_pages_locked() waiting on
the mm lock and returns -EAGAIN up the stack. If the iomap dio
iteration layer has made no progress on the write to this point,
-EAGAIN returns up to the filesystem and triggers the warning.
This use of the overwrite flag in ext4 is precautionary and
half-baked. I.e., ext4 doesn't actually implement overwrite checking
in the iomap callbacks when the flag is set, so the only extra
verification it provides are i_size checks in the generic iomap dio
layer. Combined with the tendency for false positives, the added
verification is not worth the extra trouble. Remove the flag,
associated warning, and update the comments to document when
concurrent unaligned dio writes are allowed and why said flag is not
used.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+5050ad0fb47527b1808a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Fixes: 310ee0902b ("ext4: allow concurrent unaligned dio overwrites")
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810165559.946222-1-bfoster@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
clang's static analysis warning: fs/ext4/mballoc.c
line 4178, column 6, Branch condition evaluates to a garbage value.
err is uninitialized and will be judged when 'len <= 0' or
it first enters the loop while the condition "!ext4_sb_block_valid()"
is true. Although this can't make problems now, it's better to
correct it.
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725043310.1227621-1-suhui@nfschina.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The return value type of i_blocksize() is 'unsigned int', so the
type of blocksize has been modified from 'int' to 'unsigned int'
to ensure data type consistency.
Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707105516.9156-1-luhongfei@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Running generic/475(filesystem consistent tests after power cut) could
easily trigger unattached inode error while doing fsck:
Unattached zero-length inode 39405. Clear? no
Unattached inode 39405
Connect to /lost+found? no
Above inconsistence is caused by following process:
P1 P2
ext4_create
inode = ext4_new_inode_start_handle // itable records nlink=1
ext4_add_nondir
err = ext4_add_entry // ENOSPC
ext4_append
ext4_bread
ext4_getblk
ext4_map_blocks // returns ENOSPC
drop_nlink(inode) // won't be updated into disk inode
ext4_orphan_add(handle, inode)
ext4_orphan_file_add
ext4_journal_stop(handle)
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction // commit success
>> power cut <<
ext4_fill_super
ext4_load_and_init_journal // itable records nlink=1
ext4_orphan_cleanup
ext4_process_orphan
if (inode->i_nlink) // true, inode won't be deleted
Then, allocated inode will be reserved on disk and corresponds to no
dentries, so e2fsck reports 'unattached inode' problem.
The problem won't happen if orphan file feature is disabled, because
ext4_orphan_add() will update disk inode in orphan list mode. There
are several places not updating disk inode while putting inode into
orphan area, such as ext4_add_nondir(), ext4_symlink() and whiteout
in ext4_rename(). Fix it by updating inode into disk in all error
branches of these places.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217605
Fixes: 02f310fcf4 ("ext4: Speedup ext4 orphan inode handling")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230628132011.650383-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We got a filesystem inconsistency issue below while running generic/475
I/O failure pressure test with fast_commit feature enabled.
Symlink /p3/d3/d1c/d6c/dd6/dce/l101 (inode #132605) is invalid.
If fast_commit feature is enabled, a special fast_commit journal area is
appended to the end of the normal journal area. The journal->j_last
point to the first unused block behind the normal journal area instead
of the whole log area, and the journal->j_fc_last point to the first
unused block behind the fast_commit journal area. While doing journal
recovery, do_one_pass(PASS_SCAN) should first scan the normal journal
area and turn around to the first block once it meet journal->j_last,
but the wrap() macro misuse the journal->j_fc_last, so the recovering
could not read the next magic block (commit block perhaps) and would end
early mistakenly and missing tN and every transaction after it in the
following example. Finally, it could lead to filesystem inconsistency.
| normal journal area | fast commit area |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
| tN(rere) | tN+1 |~| tN-x |...| tN-1 | tN(front) | .... |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
/ / /
start journal->j_last journal->j_fc_last
This patch fix it by use the correct ending journal->j_last.
Fixes: 5b849b5f96 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20230613043120.GB1584772@mit.edu/
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230626073322.3956567-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Factor out a new helper form ext4_get_dev_journal() to get external
journal bdev and check validation of this device, drop ext4_blkdev_get()
helper, and also remove duplicate check of journal feature. It makes
ext4_get_dev_journal() more clear than before.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-12-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Adjust the initialization sequence and error handle of journal_t, moving
load superblock to the begin, and classify others initialization.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-9-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FAST_COMMIT bit is set, it means the journal
have fast commit records need to recover, so the fast commit size
should not be too large, and the leftover normal journal size should
never less than JBD2_MIN_JOURNAL_BLOCKS. If it happens, the
journal->j_last is likely to be wrong and will probably lead to
incorrect journal recovery. So add a check into the
journal_check_superblock(), and drop the pointless check when
initializing the fastcommit parameters.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-8-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Rename load_superblock() to journal_load_superblock(), move getting and
reading superblock from journal_init_common() and
journal_get_superblock() to this function, and also rename
journal_get_superblock() to journal_check_superblock(), make it a pure
check helper to check superblock validity from disk.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
jbd2_verify_csum_type() helper check checksum type in the superblock for
v2 or v3 checksum feature, it always return true if these features are
not enabled, and it has only one user, so open code it is more clear.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-6-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
journal_get_superblock() is used to check validity of the jounal
supberblock, so move the features checks from jbd2_journal_load() to
journal_get_superblock().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Since load_superblock() has been moved to journal_init_common(), the
in-memory superblock structure is initialized and contains valid data
once the file system has a journal_t object, so it's safe to access it,
let's drop the call to journal_get_superblock() from
jbd2_journal_check_used_features() and also drop the setting/clearing of
the veirfy bit of the superblock buffer.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Move the call to load_superblock() from jbd2_journal_load() and
jbd2_journal_wipe() early into journal_init_common(), the journal
superblock gets read and the in-memory journal_t structure gets
initialised after calling jbd2_journal_init_{dev,inode}, it's safe to
do following initialization according to it.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Move load_superblock() declaration and the functions it calls before
journal_init_common(). This is a preparation for moving a call to
load_superblock() from jbd2_journal_load() and jbd2_journal_wipe() to
journal_init_common(). No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811063610.2980059-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN only make sense for regular files, as for
non-regular files we never normalize the allocation request length i.e.
goal len is same as original length (ac_g_ex.fe_len == ac_o_ex.fe_len).
Hence there is no scope of trimming the goal length to make it
satisfy original request len. Thus this patch avoids using
CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN criteria for non-regular files request.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 33122aa930f1 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)")
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2a694c748ff8b8c4b416995a24f06f07b55047a8.1689516047.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If the filename casefolding fails, we'll be leaking memory from the
fscrypt_name struct, namely from the 'crypto_buf.name' member.
Make sure we free it in the error path on both ext4_fname_setup_filename()
and ext4_fname_prepare_lookup() functions.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 1ae98e295f ("ext4: optimize match for casefolded encrypted dirs")
Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803091713.13239-1-lhenriques@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The code calling function '__cp_buffer_busy' has been removed, so the
function should also be removed.
silence the warning:
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:48:20: warning: unused function '__cp_buffer_busy'
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5518
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Following process will corrupt ext4 image:
Step 1:
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
__jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction)
// Put jh into trans1->t_checkpoint_list
journal->j_checkpoint_transactions = commit_transaction
// Put trans1 into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
Step 2:
do_get_write_access
test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty，set jbd dirty
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction) // jh belongs to trans2
Step 3:
drop_cache
journal_shrink_one_cp_list
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint
if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) // lock bh, true
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) // buffer is not dirty
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
// remove jh from trans1->t_checkpoint_list
Step 4:
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
trans1 = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
// jh is not in trans1->t_checkpoint_list
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal) // trans1 is done
Step 5: Power cut, trans2 is not committed, jh is lost in next mounting.
Fix it by checking 'jh->b_transaction' before remove it from checkpoint.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 46f881b5b1 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the
committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it
meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan
and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests
below.
Test cmd:
./fs_mark -d scratch -s 1024 -n 10000 -t 1 -D 100 -N 100
Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8304.9 49033
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 7649.0 50012
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 2107.1 50871
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in
journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~
100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it
through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add
a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy
buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+.
After this fix:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8558.4 49109
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: b98dba273a ("jbd2: remove journal_clean_one_cp_list()")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We named criteria with CR_XXX, correct stale comment to criteria with
raw number.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good
group is found after loop.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good
group is found after loop.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove ext4_set_bit_atomic and ext4_clear_bit_atomic which are defined but not
used.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Replace the traditional ternary conditional operator with with max()/min()
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The return at end of void function is unnecessary, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove unnecessary NULL
initialization of grp and futher check if good group is found after loop.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ngroups is ext4_group_t (unsigned int) while next_linear_group treat it
in int. If ngroups is bigger than max number described by int, it will
be treat as a negative number. Then "return group + 1 >= ngroups ? 0 :
group + 1;" may keep returning 0.
Switch int to ext4_group_t in next_linear_group to fix the overflow.
Fixes: 196e402adf ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning")
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Group corruption check will access memory of grp and will trigger kernel
crash if grp is NULL. So do NULL check before corruption check.
Fixes: 5354b2af34 ("ext4: allow ext4_get_group_info() to fail")
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Replace CR_FAST with ext4_mb_cr_expensive() inline function for better
readability. This function returns true if the criteria is one of the
expensive/slower ones where lots of disk IO/prefetching is acceptable.
No functional changes are intended in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630085927.140137-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The multi-mount protection kthread checks for read-only filesystem and
aborts in that case. The remount code actually handles stopping of the
kthread on remount so the only purpose of the check is in case of
emergency remount read-only. Replace the check for read-only filesystem
with a check for shutdown filesystem as running MMP on such is risky
anyway and it makes ordering of things during remount simpler.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-11-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
JBD2 code will quickly return without doing anything when there's
nothing to commit so there's no point in the read-only check in
ext4_force_commit(). Just drop it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-10-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We should not have dirty inodes on read-only filesystem. Also silently
bailing without writing anything would be a problem when we enable
quotas during remount while the filesystem is read-only. So drop the
read-only check.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-9-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We better should not be initializing inode tables on read-only
filesystem. The following transaction start will warn us and make the
function bail anyway so drop the pointless check.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-8-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that filesystem abort marks the filesystem as shutdown, we shouldn't
be ever hitting the sb_rdonly() check in ext4_journal_check_start().
Since this is a suitable place for catching all sorts of programming
errors, convert the check to WARN_ON instead of dropping it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When the filesystem gets first remounted read-only and then unmounted,
ext4_quota_off() will try to start a transaction (and fail) on read-only
filesystem to cleanup inode flags for legacy quota files. Just bail
before trying to start a transaction instead since that is going to
issue a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED flag has practically the same intent as
EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN flag. The shutdown flag is checked in many more
places than the aborted flag which is mostly the historical artifact
where we were relying on SB_RDONLY checks instead of the aborted flag
checks. There are only three places - ext4_sync_file(),
__ext4_remount(), and mballoc debug code - which check aborted flag and
not shutdown flag and this is arguably a bug. Avoid these
inconsistencies by removing EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED flag and using
EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-5-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
'abort' mount option is the only mount option that has special handling
and sets a bit in sbi->s_mount_flags. There is not strong reason for
that so just simplify the code and make 'abort' set a bit in
sbi->s_mount_opt2 as any other mount option. This simplifies the code
and will allow us to drop EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED completely in the following
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently ext4_forced_shutdown() takes struct ext4_sb_info but most
callers need to get it from struct super_block anyway. So just pass in
struct super_block to save all callers from some boilerplate code. No
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_freeze() and ext4_unfreeze() checks for sb_rdonly(). However this
check is pointless as VFS already checks for read-only filesystem before
calling filesystem specific methods. Remove the pointless checks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616165109.21695-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
