DW SPI: refactor poll_transfer functions
There is no sense in waiting for RX data in dw_reader function: there is no chance that RX data will appear in RX FIFO if RX FIFO is empty after previous TX write in dw_writer function. So get rid of this waiting. After that we can get rid of dw_reader return value and make it returning void. After that we can get rid of dw_reader return value check in poll_transfer function. With these changes we're getting closer to Linux DW SPI driver. Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc282c7bcb
commit
d3d8aaec74
@ -286,28 +286,16 @@ static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi_priv *priv)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int dw_reader(struct dw_spi_priv *priv)
|
||||
static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi_priv *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned start = get_timer(0);
|
||||
u32 max;
|
||||
u32 max = rx_max(priv);
|
||||
u16 rxw;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait for rx data to be ready */
|
||||
while (rx_max(priv) == 0) {
|
||||
if (get_timer(start) > RX_TIMEOUT)
|
||||
return -ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
max = rx_max(priv);
|
||||
|
||||
while (max--) {
|
||||
rxw = dw_readw(priv, DW_SPI_DR);
|
||||
debug("%s: rx=0x%02x\n", __func__, rxw);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Care about rx only if the transfer's original "rx" is
|
||||
* not null
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* Care about rx if the transfer's original "rx" is not null */
|
||||
if (priv->rx_end - priv->len) {
|
||||
if (priv->bits_per_word == 8)
|
||||
*(u8 *)(priv->rx) = rxw;
|
||||
@ -316,19 +304,13 @@ static int dw_reader(struct dw_spi_priv *priv)
|
||||
}
|
||||
priv->rx += priv->bits_per_word >> 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int poll_transfer(struct dw_spi_priv *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dw_writer(priv);
|
||||
ret = dw_reader(priv);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
dw_reader(priv);
|
||||
} while (priv->rx_end > priv->rx);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user