gpio: xilinx: Simplify logic in xilinx_gpio_set_value
There is no reason to do read/write for if/else separately. Reported-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan@herbrechtsmeier.net> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan@herbrechtsmeier.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf2a69de81
commit
642a860412
@ -61,18 +61,17 @@ static int xilinx_gpio_set_value(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset,
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
|
||||
debug("%s: regs: %lx, value: %x, gpio: %x, bank %x, pin %x\n",
|
||||
__func__, (ulong)platdata->regs, value, offset, bank, pin);
|
||||
|
||||
if (value) {
|
||||
val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
if (value)
|
||||
val = val | (1 << pin);
|
||||
writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
else
|
||||
val = val & ~(1 << pin);
|
||||
writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2);
|
||||
|
||||
return val;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user