Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-07-04
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 73 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 106 files changed, 5233 insertions(+), 1283 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) bpftool ability to show PIDs of processes having open file descriptors
for BPF map/program/link/BTF objects, relying on BPF iterator progs
to extract this info efficiently, from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) Addition of BPF iterator progs for dumping TCP and UDP sockets to
seq_files, from Yonghong Song.
3) Support access to BPF map fields in struct bpf_map from programs
through BTF struct access, from Andrey Ignatov.
4) Add a bpf_get_task_stack() helper to be able to dump /proc/*/stack
via seq_file from BPF iterator progs, from Song Liu.
5) Make SO_KEEPALIVE and related options available to bpf_setsockopt()
helper, from Dmitry Yakunin.
6) Optimize BPF sk_storage selection of its caching index, from Martin
KaFai Lau.
7) Removal of redundant synchronize_rcu()s from BPF map destruction which
has been a historic leftover, from Alexei Starovoitov.
8) Several improvements to test_progs to make it easier to create a shell
loop that invokes each test individually which is useful for some CIs,
from Jesper Dangaard Brouer.
9) Fix bpftool prog dump segfault when compiled without skeleton code on
older clang versions, from John Fastabend.
10) Bunch of cleanups and minor improvements, from various others.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
==================
BPF Selftest Notes
==================
General instructions on running selftests can be found in
`Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_.
Additional information about selftest failures are
documented here.
bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0
=============================================
With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed:
* ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route``
* ``bpf_iter/netlink``
The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like
.. code-block:: c
2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
...
14: (bf) r2 = r8
15: (0f) r2 += r1
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen);
16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2
only read is supported
The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like
.. code-block:: c
; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk;
2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
...
15: (bf) r2 = r7
16: (0f) r2 += r1
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol);
17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2
only read is supported
This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466
has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be
available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk.
f91c031e65