Dave Young 1905f6c736 bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix ... Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing. The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add: rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock In __rfcomm_dlc_close: d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change) There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;" is enough. [ 295.002046] ======================================================= [ 295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock: [ 295.002046] (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] but task is already holding lock: [ 295.002046] (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240 [ 295.002046] [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90 [ 295.002046] [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140 [ 295.002046] [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60 [ 295.002046] [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] other info that might help us debug this: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705: [ 295.002046] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] #1: (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] stack backtrace: [ 295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 [ 295.002046] [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70 [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0 [ 295.002046] [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30 [ 295.002046] [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] ======================= Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2008-04-01 23:59:06 -07:00
..
bnep	bluetooth: make bnep_sock_cleanup() return void	2008-03-05 18:47:40 -08:00
cmtp	[BLUETOOTH]: Use sockfd_put()	2008-01-28 15:00:48 -08:00
hidp	bluetooth: uninlining	2008-02-05 03:07:58 -08:00
rfcomm	bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix	2008-04-01 23:59:06 -07:00
af_bluetooth.c	bluetooth : use lockdep sub-classes for diffrent bluetooth protocol	2008-04-01 23:58:35 -07:00
hci_conn.c	bluetooth: put hci dev after del conn	2008-02-18 20:44:01 -08:00
hci_core.c	bluetooth: hci_core: defer hci_unregister_sysfs()	2008-03-05 18:45:59 -08:00
hci_event.c	[Bluetooth] Add support for handling simple eSCO links	2007-10-22 02:59:47 -07:00
hci_sock.c	bluetooth: replace deprecated RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED macros	2008-03-28 16:17:38 -07:00
hci_sysfs.c	bluetooth: do not move child device other than rfcomm	2008-02-18 20:45:41 -08:00
Kconfig	[S390] Kconfig: unwanted menus for s390.	2007-05-10 15:46:07 +02:00
l2cap.c	bluetooth: replace deprecated RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED macros	2008-03-28 16:17:38 -07:00
lib.c	[NET] BLUETOOTH: Fix whitespace errors.	2007-02-10 23:19:20 -08:00
Makefile
sco.c	bluetooth: replace deprecated RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED macros	2008-03-28 16:17:38 -07:00