cc9f72e474
Setting si_code to __SI_FAULT results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0. This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0 for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI. This was introduced in 2.3.41 so this mess has had a long time for people to be able to start depending on it. As this bug has existed for 17 years already I don't know if it is worth fixing. It is definitely worth documenting what is going on so that no one decides to copy this bad decision. Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| boot | ||
| configs | ||
| crypto | ||
| include | ||
| kernel | ||
| lib | ||
| math-emu | ||
| mm | ||
| net | ||
| oprofile | ||
| power | ||
| prom | ||
| Kbuild | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Kconfig.debug | ||
| Makefile | ||