forked from Minki/linux
b264f57fde
When sending an IPI to a single CPU there is no need to deal with cpumasks. With 2 CPU guest on WS2019 a minor (like 3%, 8043 -> 7761 CPU cycles) improvement with smp_call_function_single() loop benchmark can be seeb. The optimization, however, is tiny and straitforward. Also, send_ipi_one() is important for PV spinlock kick. Switching to the regular APIC IPI send for CPU > 64 case does not make sense as it is twice as expesive (12650 CPU cycles for __send_ipi_mask_ex() call, 26000 for orig_apic.send_IPI(cpu, vector)). Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191027151938.7296-1-vkuznets@redhat.com |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| hv_apic.c | ||
| hv_init.c | ||
| hv_spinlock.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mmu.c | ||
| nested.c | ||