Paul E. McKenney ce5f4fc861 nohz_full: Document additional restrictions ... This commit calls out the potential for slowing the tick even when there are multiple runnable processes per CPU, It also points out that current mainlined version keeps the tick going on at least one CPU even when all CPUs are otherwise idle. Finally, it notes the need for a 1-HZ tick in order to calculate CPU load, maintain sched average, compute CFS entity vruntime, compute avenrun, and carry out load balancing. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>		2013-06-10 13:42:38 -07:00
..
00-INDEX
highres.txt	doc: fix broken references	2011-09-27 18:08:04 +02:00
hpet_example.c	Documentation/timers/hpet_example.c: add supporting info for hpet_example	2010-10-26 16:52:11 -07:00
hpet.txt
hrtimers.txt
Makefile	Documentation/timers/hpet_example.c: only build on X86	2010-06-01 10:05:19 -07:00
NO_HZ.txt	nohz_full: Document additional restrictions	2013-06-10 13:42:38 -07:00
timer_stats.txt	tree-wide: fix comment/printk typos	2010-11-01 15:38:34 -04:00
timers-howto.txt	doc: timers-howto: fix a typo ("unsgined")	2011-05-17 10:52:02 +02:00