leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
9e4a90fd34
linux/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c
Paul Mackerras 4bb3c7a020 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Work around transactional memory bugs in POWER9 
POWER9 has hardware bugs relating to transactional memory and thread
reconfiguration (changes to hardware SMT mode).  Specifically, the core
does not have enough storage to store a complete checkpoint of all the
architected state for all four threads.  The DD2.2 version of POWER9
includes hardware modifications designed to allow hypervisor software
to implement workarounds for these problems.  This patch implements
those workarounds in KVM code so that KVM guests see a full, working
transactional memory implementation.

The problems center around the use of TM suspended state, where the
CPU has a checkpointed state but execution is not transactional.  The
workaround is to implement a "fake suspend" state, which looks to the
guest like suspended state but the CPU does not store a checkpoint.
In this state, any instruction that would cause a transition to
transactional state (rfid, rfebb, mtmsrd, tresume) or would use the
checkpointed state (treclaim) causes a "soft patch" interrupt (vector
0x1500) to the hypervisor so that it can be emulated.  The trechkpt
instruction also causes a soft patch interrupt.

On POWER9 DD2.2, we avoid returning to the guest in any state which
would require a checkpoint to be present.  The trechkpt in the guest
entry path which would normally create that checkpoint is replaced by
either a transition to fake suspend state, if the guest is in suspend
state, or a rollback to the pre-transactional state if the guest is in
transactional state.  Fake suspend state is indicated by a flag in the
PACA plus a new bit in the PSSCR.  The new PSSCR bit is write-only and
reads back as 0.

On exit from the guest, if the guest is in fake suspend state, we still
do the treclaim instruction as we would in real suspend state, in order
to get into non-transactional state, but we do not save the resulting
register state since there was no checkpoint.

Emulation of the instructions that cause a softpatch interrupt is
handled in two paths.  If the guest is in real suspend mode, we call
kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation_early() to handle the cases where the guest is
transitioning to transactional state.  This is called before we do the
treclaim in the guest exit path; because we haven't done treclaim, we
can get back to the guest with the transaction still active.  If the
instruction is a case that kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation_early() doesn't
handle, or if the guest is in fake suspend state, then we proceed to
do the complete guest exit path and subsequently call
kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation() in host context with the MMU on.  This handles
all the cases including the cases that generate program interrupts
(illegal instruction or TM Bad Thing) and facility unavailable
interrupts.

The emulation is reasonably straightforward and is mostly concerned
with checking for exception conditions and updating the state of
registers such as MSR and CR0.  The treclaim emulation takes care to
ensure that the TEXASR register gets updated as if it were the guest
treclaim instruction that had done failure recording, not the treclaim
done in hypervisor state in the guest exit path.

With this, the KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM capability returns true (1) even if
transactional memory is not available to host userspace.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-03-24 00:39:13 +11:00

217 lines
6.9 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

/*
* Copyright 2017 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
#include <asm/kvm_book3s.h>
#include <asm/kvm_book3s_64.h>
#include <asm/reg.h>
#include <asm/ppc-opcode.h>
static void emulate_tx_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 failure_cause)
{
u64 texasr, tfiar;
u64 msr = vcpu->arch.shregs.msr;
tfiar = vcpu->arch.pc & ~0x3ull;
texasr = (failure_cause << 56) | TEXASR_ABORT | TEXASR_FS | TEXASR_EXACT;
if (MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(vcpu->arch.shregs.msr))
texasr |= TEXASR_SUSP;
if (msr & MSR_PR) {
texasr |= TEXASR_PR;
tfiar |= 1;
}
vcpu->arch.tfiar = tfiar;
/* Preserve ROT and TL fields of existing TEXASR */
vcpu->arch.texasr = (vcpu->arch.texasr & 0x3ffffff) | texasr;
}
/*
* This gets called on a softpatch interrupt on POWER9 DD2.2 processors.
* We expect to find a TM-related instruction to be emulated. The
* instruction image is in vcpu->arch.emul_inst. If the guest was in
* TM suspended or transactional state, the checkpointed state has been
* reclaimed and is in the vcpu struct. The CPU is in virtual mode in
* host context.
*/
int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u32 instr = vcpu->arch.emul_inst;
u64 msr = vcpu->arch.shregs.msr;
u64 newmsr, bescr;
int ra, rs;
switch (instr & 0xfc0007ff) {
case PPC_INST_RFID:
/* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */
newmsr = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr1;
/* should only get here for Sx -> T1 transition */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(msr) &&
MSR_TM_TRANSACTIONAL(newmsr) &&
(newmsr & MSR_TM)));
newmsr = sanitize_msr(newmsr);
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr;
vcpu->arch.cfar = vcpu->arch.pc - 4;
vcpu->arch.pc = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr0;
return RESUME_GUEST;
case PPC_INST_RFEBB:
if ((msr & MSR_PR) && (vcpu->arch.vcore->pcr & PCR_ARCH_206)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* check EBB facility is available */
if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_EBB)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
if ((msr & MSR_PR) && !(vcpu->arch.fscr & FSCR_EBB)) {
/* generate a facility unavailable interrupt */
vcpu->arch.fscr = (vcpu->arch.fscr & ~(0xffull << 56)) |
((u64)FSCR_EBB_LG << 56);
kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FAC_UNAVAIL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
bescr = vcpu->arch.bescr;
/* expect to see a S->T transition requested */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(msr) &&
((bescr >> 30) & 3) == 2));
bescr &= ~BESCR_GE;
if (instr & (1 << 11))
bescr |= BESCR_GE;
vcpu->arch.bescr = bescr;
msr = (msr & ~MSR_TS_MASK) | MSR_TS_T;
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr;
vcpu->arch.cfar = vcpu->arch.pc - 4;
vcpu->arch.pc = vcpu->arch.ebbrr;
return RESUME_GUEST;
case PPC_INST_MTMSRD:
/* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */
rs = (instr >> 21) & 0x1f;
newmsr = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rs);
/* check this is a Sx -> T1 transition */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(msr) &&
MSR_TM_TRANSACTIONAL(newmsr) &&
(newmsr & MSR_TM)));
/* mtmsrd doesn't change LE */
newmsr = (newmsr & ~MSR_LE) | (msr & MSR_LE);
newmsr = sanitize_msr(newmsr);
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr;
return RESUME_GUEST;
case PPC_INST_TSR:
/* check for PR=1 and arch 2.06 bit set in PCR */
if ((msr & MSR_PR) && (vcpu->arch.vcore->pcr & PCR_ARCH_206)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */
if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
if (!(msr & MSR_TM)) {
/* generate a facility unavailable interrupt */
vcpu->arch.fscr = (vcpu->arch.fscr & ~(0xffull << 56)) |
((u64)FSCR_TM_LG << 56);
kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FAC_UNAVAIL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* Set CR0 to indicate previous transactional state */
vcpu->arch.cr = (vcpu->arch.cr & 0x0fffffff) |
(((msr & MSR_TS_MASK) >> MSR_TS_S_LG) << 28);
/* L=1 => tresume, L=0 => tsuspend */
if (instr & (1 << 21)) {
if (MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(msr))
msr = (msr & ~MSR_TS_MASK) | MSR_TS_T;
} else {
if (MSR_TM_TRANSACTIONAL(msr))
msr = (msr & ~MSR_TS_MASK) | MSR_TS_S;
}
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr;
return RESUME_GUEST;
case PPC_INST_TRECLAIM:
/* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */
if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
if (!(msr & MSR_TM)) {
/* generate a facility unavailable interrupt */
vcpu->arch.fscr = (vcpu->arch.fscr & ~(0xffull << 56)) |
((u64)FSCR_TM_LG << 56);
kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FAC_UNAVAIL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* If no transaction active, generate TM bad thing */
if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) {
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGTM);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* If failure was not previously recorded, recompute TEXASR */
if (!(vcpu->arch.orig_texasr & TEXASR_FS)) {
ra = (instr >> 16) & 0x1f;
if (ra)
ra = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, ra) & 0xff;
emulate_tx_failure(vcpu, ra);
}
copy_from_checkpoint(vcpu);
/* Set CR0 to indicate previous transactional state */
vcpu->arch.cr = (vcpu->arch.cr & 0x0fffffff) |
(((msr & MSR_TS_MASK) >> MSR_TS_S_LG) << 28);
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK;
return RESUME_GUEST;
case PPC_INST_TRECHKPT:
/* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */
/* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */
if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) {
/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
if (!(msr & MSR_TM)) {
/* generate a facility unavailable interrupt */
vcpu->arch.fscr = (vcpu->arch.fscr & ~(0xffull << 56)) |
((u64)FSCR_TM_LG << 56);
kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FAC_UNAVAIL);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* If transaction active or TEXASR[FS] = 0, bad thing */
if (MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr) || !(vcpu->arch.texasr & TEXASR_FS)) {
kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGTM);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
copy_to_checkpoint(vcpu);
/* Set CR0 to indicate previous transactional state */
vcpu->arch.cr = (vcpu->arch.cr & 0x0fffffff) |
(((msr & MSR_TS_MASK) >> MSR_TS_S_LG) << 28);
vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr | MSR_TS_S;
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
/* What should we do here? We didn't recognize the instruction */
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return RESUME_GUEST;
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink