To make it consistent with the other dso lifetime routines.
For instance:
struct dso *vdso__new(struct machine *machine, const char *short_name,
const char *long_name)
Becomes:
struct dso *machine__addnew_vdso(struct machine *machine, const
char *short_name, const char *long_name)
Because:
1) There is no 'struct vdso' for us to have vdso__ prefixed routines.
2) Because it will not really just create a new instance of 'struct
dso', it'll call dso__new() but it will also insert it into the
DSO's list/rbtree, and we have a method name for that: 'addnew',
just like we have dsos__addnew().
3) So it is really a 'struct machine' operation, it is the first
argument, etc.
This way the place where this is used gets consistent:
if (vdso) {
pgoff = 0;
- dso = vdso__dso_findnew(machine, thread);
+ dso = machine__findnew_vdso(machine, thread);
} else
dso = machine__findnew_dso(machine, filename);
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-r3w3tvh8exm9xfz3p4tz9qbz@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
9a4388c711