We met a problem of pm_suspend when repeated closing/opening the lid
on a Lenovo laptop (1/20 reproduce rate), below is the log:
[ 199.735876] PM: Entering mem sleep
[ 199.750516] e1000e: EEE TX LPI TIMER: 00000011
[ 199.856638] Trying to free nonexistent resource <000000000000d000-000000000000d0ff>
[ 201.753566] brcmfmac: brcmf_pcie_suspend: Timeout on response for entering D3 substate
[ 201.753581] pci_legacy_suspend(): brcmf_pcie_suspend+0x0/0x1f0 [brcmfmac] returns -5
[ 201.753585] dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x160 returns -5
[ 201.753589] PM: Device 0000:04:00.0 failed to suspend async: error -5
Through debugging, we found when problem happens, it is not the device
fails to enter D3, but the signal D3_ACK comes too early to pass the
waitqueue_active() check.
Just like this:
brcmf_pcie_send_mb_data(devinfo, BRCMF_H2D_HOST_D3_INFORM);
// signal is triggered here
wait_event_timeout(devinfo->mbdata_resp_wait, devinfo->mbdata_completed,
BRCMF_PCIE_MBDATA_TIMEOUT);
So far I think it is safe to remove waitqueue_active check since there
is only one place to trigger this signal (sending
BRCMF_H2D_HOST_D3_INFORM). And it is not a problem calling wake_up
event earlier than calling wait_event.
Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>
Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Cc: Franky (Zhenhui) Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
107b871333