forked from Minki/linux
e488ca9f8d
As noted here [1], there are potentially future conflicts if we try to
use MTD's "partitions" subnode to describe anything besides just the
fixed-in-the-device-tree partitions currently described in this
document. Particularly, there was a proposal to use this node for the
AFS parser too.
It can pose a (small) problem to try to differentiate the following
nodes:
// using binding as currently specified
partitions {
#address-cells = <x>;
#size-cells = <y>;
partition@0 {
...;
};
};
and
// proposed future binding
partitions {
compatible = "arm,arm-flash-structure";
};
It's especially difficult if other uses of this node start having
subnodes.
So, since the "partitions" node is new in v4.4, let's fixup the binding
before release so that it requires a compatible property, so it's much
clearer to distinguish. e.g.:
// proposed
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <x>;
#size-cells = <y>;
partition@0 {
...;
};
};
[1] Subject: "mtd: create a partition type device tree binding"
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151113220039.GA74382@google.com
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063355.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063364.html
Cc: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| chips | ||
| devices | ||
| lpddr | ||
| maps | ||
| nand | ||
| onenand | ||
| spi-nor | ||
| tests | ||
| ubi | ||
| afs.c | ||
| ar7part.c | ||
| bcm47xxpart.c | ||
| bcm63xxpart.c | ||
| cmdlinepart.c | ||
| ftl.c | ||
| inftlcore.c | ||
| inftlmount.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mtd_blkdevs.c | ||
| mtdblock_ro.c | ||
| mtdblock.c | ||
| mtdchar.c | ||
| mtdconcat.c | ||
| mtdcore.c | ||
| mtdcore.h | ||
| mtdoops.c | ||
| mtdpart.c | ||
| mtdsuper.c | ||
| mtdswap.c | ||
| nftlcore.c | ||
| nftlmount.c | ||
| ofpart.c | ||
| redboot.c | ||
| rfd_ftl.c | ||
| sm_ftl.c | ||
| sm_ftl.h | ||
| ssfdc.c | ||