Currently for registers without fields we create a comment pointing at
the common definitions, e.g.
| #define REG_TTBR0_EL1 S3_0_C2_C0_0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 2, 0, 0)
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op0 3
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op1 0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_CRn 2
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_CRm 0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op2 0
|
| /* See TTBRx_EL1 */
It would be slightly nicer if the comment said what we should be looking
for, e.g.
| #define REG_TTBR0_EL1 S3_0_C2_C0_0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 2, 0, 0)
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op0 3
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op1 0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_CRn 2
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_CRm 0
| #define SYS_TTBR0_EL1_Op2 0
|
| /* For TTBR0_EL1 fields see TTBRx_EL1 */
Update the comment generation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513174118.266966-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
82bf59002e